Global Research – by Makia Freeman
Joshua Wong has recently been doing some flyin’ around and hobnobbing with the rich, famous and powerful. He went to Berlin and met with German Chancellor Angela Merkel and other ‘pro-democracy’ figures like Mayor of Kiev Vitaly Klitschko, who was for awhile himself a Western favorite when the US was actively involved in the color revolution in Ukraine. While there, Wong met with Raed Al Saleh, the head of the White Helmets. For those who don’t know, the White Helmets are a Western propaganda construct with close links to terrorist groups such as Al Qaeda and Jahbat Al Nusra (now known as Tahrir Al Sham). What would a supposedly organic grassroots movement leader in China have in common with a Syrian war organization? On the surface, nothing; under the surface, everything; they are both propaganda and destabilization tools of Western (US-UK) foreign meddling and interference.
A Brief Background: The White Helmets-Al Qaeda-Al Nusra Connection
The White Helmets paraded around like heroes pretending to be the saviors of the Syrian people during the earlier years of the Syrian War (which is still ongoing). Appropriately, they were the stars of a TV documentary which won Oscars. Oscars are awarded for acting – and that’s all it really was, acting. The White Helmets were founded in 2013 by James Le Mesurier, a British ex-mercenary and intelligence agent. True independent journalists such as Vanessa Beeley exposed how the White Helmets were a front for various groups of US-UK-Israeli funded rebel terrorists, who were fighting the legitimately elected president of Syria, Bashar Al Assad. In videos like this and this, Beeley walks through an abandoned White Helmets center in Sakhour, East Aleppo … right next door (20 meters) from the Al Nusra Front Aleppo headquarters. In fact, both centers had various entrances to each other and the only thing dividing them is a playground wall. Beeley noted:
“On the 30th April 2017 we visited the abandoned White Helmet centre in Sakhour, East Aleppo. This was the biggest, and most publicized White Helmet centre in East Aleppo. Paperwork left behind proves that various US, UK, EU countries were supplying the group … The White Helmets, as we know, are exclusively embedded in Nusra Front, ISIS & other extremist controlled areas … that contain maximum 20% of the Syrian population, many of whom are living under enforced starvation, deprivation, lack of medical care, imprisonment, torture, execution, rape … at the hands of the extremist factions that the White Helmets support and assist.”
Hong Kong Protest Leader Joshua Wong Also Met with Neocon Coup-Plotter Marco Rubio
If Joshua Wong is trying to paint himself as a leader of a grassroots movement, he’s doing the worst job possible. The evidence is overwhelming that he’s just another pawn of US foreign policy and regime change efforts, led by notorious NGOs like the NED (National Endowment for Democracy). This is the case even if a large segment of the Hong Kong protestors are grassroots activists and ordinary people. As mentioned in articles like Taunting the Dragon: Background to US-China Trade War & Hong Kong Protests, Wong was caught meeting with senior US official Julie Eadah from the USA’s Hong Kong consulate.
Not surprisingly, if you’re following the thread by now, he even met with devoted war hawk, neocon and Venezuelan coup-plotter Marco Rubio. I highlighted Rubio’s role in the US coup against Venezuela earlier this year in 2019. I also mentioned in the above-linked Taunting the Dragon article that Rubio had been drafting legislation to forge a split in China between Beijing and the Uyghur minority group. Why on Earth would Wong be associating with Rubio, unless it was precisely because he was getting tuition and instructions on how to split Hong Kong away from China, thus causing Beijing the maximum amount of difficulty as possible?
Hong Kong Protests: Begging for US Intervention and ‘Liberation’?
As “brutal and authoritarian” as the Chinese Government might be in relation to its own people, one has to wonder what the Hong Kong protestors are thinking when they are holding up signs asking President Trump to “liberate them”? Talk about jumping out of the fire and into the frying pan. What do they want – the US to attack China and annex Hong Kong? Do they somehow think that Beijing will fold under pressure from the US-China Trade War and just let the US intervene in Hong Kong without consequences? According to RT, here’s what happened at recent protest rally on September 8th 2019:
“Hong Kong protesters rallied in their thousands and clashed with police in fresh unrest. They even called on Washington to “liberate” them from Chinese rule, suggesting some may now view the US as their patron. Thousands of demonstrators marched to the US Consulate in Hong Kong on Sunday, in what they said was an appeal to President Donald Trump to intervene in the weeks-long political turmoil. Videos of the rally show protesters waving American flags as they sing the US national anthem and play ‘The Star Spangled Banner’ through the speakers on their phones.”
US interference has reached the point of such blatancy that the color revolution protestors are actually waving US flags and playing the Star Spangled Banner! Holy cow! Guess it moved on from a weeks ago when they holding up the union jack, the flag of their former colonial rulers, the UK. RT also reported on Hong Kong Protest leader Jimmy Lai and on another Hong Kong Protest leader Martin Lee, more supposedly grassroots’ leaders who just happen to be meeting with Zionist neocon, ex-CIA head and current Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo:
“One of the men at the center of the protest movement is a Hong Kong tycoon, Jimmy Lai, whose company owns one of the most-read local papers, a tabloid called the Apple Daily. Another one is politician and barrister, Martin Lee, the founding chairman of the local Democratic Party. Both men visited Washington at the height of the protests to meet with some high-ranking US officials including State Secretary Mike Pompeo.
And as a former senior adviser in the Trump and Bush administrations Christian Whiton, who met both Lai and Lee in Hong Kong this summer, put it “causing this crisis for the Chinese government … is good in the national interests of the US.””
Final Thoughts
The Hong Kong protests are now in their 15th week and show no sings of slowing down. With the US gradually moving its focus away from Russia as enemy #1 and onto China as the new enemy #1, you can expect to see more Sinophobia (and less Russophobia). You can expect to see more foreign meddling and interference, more deals with and ‘aid’ to Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau, the Uyghurs, the Dalai Lama (Tibetans) and any other minority group which could cause friction with the ruling Chinese Communist Party. This is the 21st century, and all of these economic and meddling shenanigans are part of the 21st century new hybrid warfare.
*
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
This article was originally published on The Freedom Articles.
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Steemit and FB.
Sources
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4JFcB-sHv8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7omLaKwRT4
https://thefreedomarticles.com/ngos-choice-tool-subversion-nwo/
https://thefreedomarticles.com/soros-hack-top-10-machinations/
https://thefreedomarticles.com/taunting-dragon-us-china-trade-war-hong-kong-protests/
https://thefreedomarticles.com/4th-generation-warfare-us-attacks-venezuela/
https://twitter.com/SpeakerPelosi/status/666795258747953152
https://twitter.com/camilateleSUR/status/1171171454349729792/photo/1
https://www.rt.com/news/468361-us-hong-kong-protesters-meddling/
https://www.rt.com/news/468301-hong-kong-protest-leaders-ties-us/
Gotta admit… A part of me thought that might be some real revolution in Hong Kong. Slowly over the weeks, I grew suspicious. And now this.
When it’s real, there won’t be any talkin’ with politicians.
.
“The White Helmets, as we know, are exclusively embedded in Nusra Front, ISIS & other extremist controlled areas … that contain maximum 20% of the Syrian population, many of whom are living under enforced starvation, deprivation, lack of medical care, imprisonment, torture, execution, rape … at the hands of the extremist factions that the White Helmets support and assist.”
So they’re basically Blue Helmets… revised.
THESE SON OF A BITCHES CAN CHANGE TO THE “PINK HELMETS” FOR ALL I CARE, A TARGET IS A TARGET…………. COME GET EM CANDY ASS!!!!!!!!!!
Mark & I had a conversation about you yesterday. He says you’re a really good guy.
Since I like Mark, I’ll trust his judgement about that.
My main concern is that we’re here to educate others, not alienate them… and name-calling is counterproductive in that respect, unless it is aimed at the ones in the articles (who absolutely deserve it), or trolls, which Henry rarely allows through anymore.
IM NOT HERE TO EDUCATE FOREIGNERS OR CANDYASSES THAT WANT TO REMOVE YOUR RIGHTS. ANY COMMENTS I HAVE MADE STAND FOR WHAT THEY ARE……………………
I recall nothing about Jim saying anything about removing anyone’s rights, only attempting to preserve his own.
And I’ve ALWAYS been here to educate others, I’ve written a number of articles in attempts to do so. Anyone can come up here and yell bullsh#t and call other posters names… that takes no f$&king talent whatsoever. Hell, even a stinking jew can do THAT.
I guess my mistake was in taking you for one of the intelligent posters on the site… my bad.
That said, I disagree with Mark… I think you’re a just a loudmouth d$&k, with no worthwhile contributions to add to these conversations.
Ergo… we’re done here.
(in case you don’t know what that means, I’ll no longer be replying to, or acknowledging ANY of your unwanted comments).
To begin with, I think quite highly of Jim, he’s doing a lot for the cause of freedom, considering where he is working from.
Secondly, if there was an argument, it is between Koyote and Jim.
#1NWO Hatr, you injected yourself into an argument between two other men, neither of which need your acquiescence or consent to agree or disagree.
Koyote answered you with a simple statement instructing you that he doesn’t give a monk’s f-k what you believe through Mark Schumacher. His words are his words. And if there is an argument, it would be a private one between Jim and Koyote.
I know both of these men and if they were to meet, I believe they would become friends and your notion that you have Canadian friends bears no weight with me in this instance. My daughter-in-law and her children could carry dual passports if they wanted to.
Sometimes it’s best just to let two fellas work it out amongst themselves.
Jim, you are a brother, and I know Koyote is not aware of the situation you are working in.
Koyote, you too are my brother, and that being said, I will keep my nose out of your conversation with Jim, as quite frankly it is none of my business and I hold myself as no better or worse than anyone else on the site. I’m not here to approve or disapprove of anyone, though it gives me a good feeling as an individual when I see our people understanding one another and coming together under the common belief for the Bill of Rights, which is the only path left to freedom in my opinion.
In case our readers dont know, our Canadian friend has his own channel up in Canada and broadcast FTTWR shows and content. He is already putting himself on a shit list up there fighting the good fight. God bless him.
Check out his channel on the right margin.
Thank you Jim, looking forward to one day meeting you.
“#1NWO Hatr, you injected yourself into an argument between two other men, neither of which need your acquiescence or consent to agree or disagree.’
Unchallenged, Henry.
But by the same token, THAT conversation was TERMINATED with this final statement to KOYOTE…
“And btw… STAY THE F$&K OUT OF MY STATE WITH THAT ATTITUDE, BECAUSE I DAMN SURE DON’T WANT TO MEET YOU NOW!!!!!”
I honestly fail to comprehend how HE failed to comprehend that statement… it was basically telling him to f$&k off, and cease ALL further conversation with me.
Then, as you can clearly see, a couple days later he comes up & dogs me with replies on 3 consecutive comments. I passed on the first two, then decided to give him another chance, on Mark’s recommendation. What did that get me? Another f$&king insult.
You know me well enough to know that I don’t take sh#t from anyone, Henry, and I’m damn sure a lot more tolerant than when I first began posting here. My point is that this particular conversation need not have taken place if KOYOTE had just STFU where I’m concerned… I assumed I made it clear enough.
And btw… I happen to like Jim a lot, too.
(sorry, no more direct reply buttons)
You are missing the point. There never should have been any conflict, as the conversation was between Jim and Koyote.
You tell Koyote to never come to the state of Oregon because it is your state? Now, I’m telling you, Stephen, you’d better step back and recalculate that. This is my f-king state and my brother Koyote is welcome here anytime.
I’m trying to have a f-king vacation here, you need to get control of your ego because the last comment I wrote I meant to be the last f-king comment. And if that don’t suit you, you can see if you can run me out of the state of Oregon.
You are welcome here in the Trenches and you are with brothers and sisters, but you are no authority over any other Trencher, no more than I am. Now, by God, this had better be the end of this. It is non-productive and just what the f-king enemy wants us to do. Now think it over and get set back on course. That is not as an authority, that is as a friend who is not going to see friends going at one another without speaking out. Now you have a nice day and I am going to try to do the same.
As you wish.
Have a good day.
You too, Mark.