If you live in a country where your politicians have more allegiance to a foreign nation than to your own…your country is #Occupied.
11-24-24 pic.twitter.com/1QhYQs2uhx
— Stew Peters (@realstewpeters) November 20, 2024
Posted: November 22, 2024
Categories: Videos
Infowars got snuck in here. Just a little quiet nudge to again lend credence where credence is undeserved.
.
Yep.
Stew Peters & Infowars – NO THANKS! These guys make a very good living out of telling you you’re a slave. F*ck them & their cointelpro BS!
“Doesn’t it bother you to know, as you surely do, that another country owns us and that it carries out near continuous war crimes against an occupied people that are enabled through the use of our arms and money? Do you have no sense of shame? Where is the proud and honorable America that was once a beacon of liberty among all nations? Gone and forgotten, apparently.”
— Philip Giraldi, “Israel Wins the U.S. Election,” 11/22/24
.
“Because of our triumphant march across the planet, we have made the UN a weapon for our goals of seizing power over all kingdoms and nations. We will not allow any nations to evolve. And we will destroy by fire and sword all those nationalist movements that seek to lead people out of our dictate.”
— Rebbe Menachem Mendel Schneerson
.
“It is a battle which began nearly 120 years ago, at the moment when the Jew was granted citizen rights in the European States. The political emancipation of the Jews was the beginning of an attack of delirium. For thereby they were given full citizen rights and equality to a people which was much more clearly and definitely a race apart than all others.
The Jew will always be the born champion of private capital in its worst form, that of unchecked exploitation… Voltaire, as well as Rousseau, together with our German Fichte and many another – they are all without exception united in their recognition that the Jew is not only a foreign element differing in his essential character, which is utterly harmful to the nature of the Aryan, but that the Jewish people in itself stands against us as our deadly foe and so will stand against us always and for all time.
The master stroke of the Jew was to claim the leadership of the fourth estate [press]. He founded the Movement both of the Social Democrats and the Communists. His policy was twofold: he had his ‘apostles’ in both political camps. Amongst the parties of the Right, he encouraged those features which were most repugnant to the people – the passion for money, unscrupulous methods in trade which were employed so ruthlessly as to give rise to the proverb ‘Business, too, marches over corpses.’ And the Jew attacked the parties of the Right. Jews wormed their way into the families of the upper classes: it was from the Jews that the latter took their wives. The result was that in a short time it was precisely the ruling class which became in its character completely estranged from its own people.
That is the lurking danger, and the Jew can meet it in one way only – by destroying the hostile national intelligentsia. That is the inevitable ultimate goal of the Jew in his revolution. And this aim he must pursue; he knows well enough his economics brings no blessing: his is no master people: he is an exploiter: the Jews are a people of robbers. He has never founded any civilisation, though he has destroyed civilisations by the hundred. He possesses nothing of his own creation to which he can point.
Everything that he has is stolen. Foreign peoples, foreign workmen build him his temples, it is foreigners who create and work for him: it is foreigners who shed their blood for him. He knows no ‘people’s army’: he has only hired mercenaries who are ready to go to death on his behalf. He has no art of his own: bit by bit he has stolen it all from the other peoples or has watched them at work and then made his copy. He does not even know how merely to preserve the precious things which others have created: as he turns the treasures over in his hand they are transformed into dirt and dung. He knows that he cannot maintain any State for long. That is one of the differences between him and the Aryan.
True, the Aryan also has dominated other peoples. But how? He entered on the land, he cleared the forests; out of wildernesses he has created civilisations, and he has not used the others for his own interests, he has, so far as their capacities permitted, incorporated them into his State and through him art and science were brought to flower. In the last resort, it was the Aryan and the Aryan alone who could form States and could set them on their path to future greatness.
All that the Jew cannot do. And because he cannot do it, therefore all his revolutions must be ‘international.’ They must spread as a pestilence spreads. He can build no State and say ‘See here, Here stands the State, a model for all. Now copy us!’ He must take care that the plague does not die, that it is not limited to one place, or else in a short time this plague-hearth would burn itself out. So he is forced to bring every mortal thing to an international expansion. For how long? Until the whole world sinks in ruins and brings him down with it in the midst of the ruins.”
– Adolf Hitler, speech in Munich, 1922
Yes, he saw the nature of the jew but he saw it through a lens of supremacy. I always go into any Hitler quote with a great deal of reluctance, skepticism, caution, doubt, even resentment.
Re: “True, the Aryan also has dominated other peoples. But how? He entered on the land, he cleared the forests; out of wildernesses he has created civilizations, and he has not used the others for his own interests, he has, so far as their capacities permitted, incorporated them into his State and through him art and science were brought to flower. In the last resort, it was the Aryan and the Aryan alone who could form States and could set them on their path to future greatness.”
Making a blanket statement like that, that he “the Aryan,” “has not used the others for his own interests” reads to me like an absurdity. The history of past times and civilizations disproves this over and over again. Two instances that immediately spring to mind are The Roman Empire and The Spanish Inquisition. And we know there were so many other ruthless conquests, all the way up to and including today.
And Adolf’s love of “The State,” it lays on me like a shroud of sameness, coloring inside the lines, staying in the box. Yes, he brought prosperity to his people, and who doesn’t love to prosper, but it came with the attitude of being superior to all others, discounting the magnificent contributions of many, many non-Aryan cultures, cultures that could have done more astounding things but were held back/suppressed/denied the open evolution to innovate and thrive. due to world-management and its inherent corruption, stirring up wars, stealing resources, etc.
Oh boy, too much to say, but I’ll leave it here, ending only with this question brought on when I think of Hitler: Can any delight in eating both pudding and poison at the same time?
.
It was mainly the last paragraph that was the reply to the Schneerson quote you posted but I got lazy & posted the whole thing fully aware, as I’m sure we all are, that it contains those other bits that we may not like so much. Yes, we take it with a grain of salt. There are many quotes & articles posted on this site from those we consider “the enemy” but like it or not few spoke such hard-hitting, bare-faced warnings about the truth of letting the jew anywhere near the reins of power as Hitler.
I just get concerned Nate, because there are many voices out there right now pushing for “a benevolent dictator” to get us out of the mess, and also pushing for National Socialism. I think of my birth-right of freedom, my sovereignty as AN INDIVIDUAL, and I cringe at such proposals. We all want a way out, but not into something that compromises our life-given rights. NO HIERARCHY. NO SUPREMACY. I’m a bit hyper-vigilant about this because I want NO ONE ruling over me.
.
You & me both galen! 🙂