New Solution to Nuclear Waste Disposal

Permanent Rad Waste Solutions

The newest solution, sending the waste to the center of the earth, is the one solution combining safety, economy and permanence to nuclear waste disposal. At first glance, this seems impossible. There has never been a hole drilled in the earth’s crust, so how can one be drilled to the center of the earth? The answer? Let the earth itself do the work through known subduction faults.  

What is a subduction fault? This is an earthquake fault at the edge of a continental crust that is in collision with the adjoining oceanic crust. Since the continental crust is lighter than the oceanic crust, the latter deflects below the former when the two plates are colliding.

Permanent RadWaste Solutions has developed a process that utilizes a subduction fault for sending the waste to the center of the earth. This has the benefits of being permanent, no maintenance, much less expensive than other proposals, terrorist-proof, and no threat to people, fish, crabs or the environment.

To do this requires burying a specially designed pressure-and-temperature-compensating submersible transport vehicle (STV). It is to be buried in the sediments at a subduction fault.

The following map shows the world locations for subduction faults:

http://home.earthlink.net/~dengelhardt/NewSol.html

41 thoughts on “New Solution to Nuclear Waste Disposal

  1. this is crazy!!! If you want to really get rid of it. Send it to mars and dump it off there. Makes about as much sense as trying to completely destroy this planet.

      1. Many believe in the Hollow Earth theory, and that a benevolent race of advanced extraterrestrials live there. Perhaps by injecting radioactive waste into the Earth’s core would drive the aliens back to the surface to kick TPTB’s asses. Furthermore, if TPTB are living in deep underground military bases [DUMB], they would not want to see radioactive waste being pumped where they live.

    1. Paul- It takes at least 200 pounds of fuel to raise one pound of payload into the earth’s orbit. Getting it to the sun would take much more. There are up to 42,000 tons of nuclear wastes in the U.S. at this time. Therefore, this isn’t an option. Arthur C. Clarke had an idea about using Space Elevators to transport cargo into Earth orbit:

      “Set in the 22nd century, it describes the construction of a space elevator. This “orbital tower” is a giant structure rising from the ground and linking with a satellite in geostationary orbit at the height of approximately 36,000 kilometers (approx. 22,300 miles). Such a structure would be used to raise payloads to orbit without having to use rockets, making it much more cost effective.” (excerpt from Arthur C. Clarke novel “Fountains of Paradise”).

      Angel- The map shows many trenches that are on land, and they are deep enough in Earth to be below water tables. We already know that storage on the surface doesn’t work, nor does concrete bunkers (considering that molten fuel burned through the concrete containment floors in 3-Fukushima reactor buildings.

      1. God rest Arthur’s soul. We were friends. I use to send him a tin of my homemade cookies every Christmas. Also was close to Gerard O’Neill (RIP).
        You are right. Sending it to Space is NOT feasible. However, I don’t like taking chances with our underground water. As I’m sure you know, the majority of the Earth’s fresh water does NOT come from rain.

        1. Many of the deep trenches they would use in the Ocean are volcanic vents. Although I also do not agree with dumping rad waste in the Ocean. Japan is doing enough of this already.

        2. No , I wasn’t talking about dumping it into the above ground oceans you are talking about (though I did question whether it might seep up to them). Did you look at the link I posted @3:04 pm? They speak of an “ocean” under the solid continent of Asia. Subterranean oceans of water.

          1. There are tectonic plates that float on the Earth’s molten core also. The area selected would have to be carefully examined through sonic tests, similar to the way they find oil deposits. I will admit that all of this rad waste disposal is risky because it has never been attempted before. Better solutions would include: 1) neutralizing the radioactive waste, which can be done but is classified technology or, 2) using Tesla’s free energy technologies which have been available for over 100 years but this technology is also classified.

            So, like I was trying to tell you for the last two days, Angel, TPTB do have the means to fix the World’s problems and supply us with free energy… but doing this does not support their goals. It’s a game to them; they own the board and control all the players. However, time is running out for them; THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE WAKING UP, which is why I believe all of these massive radiation emissions are planned — not accidental. It’s TPTB’s endgame, period.

  2. interesting article. So if this article is accurate we have some questions. if this waste leaks into these bodies of water in the earth’s inner regions, how do we know if there are any current’s in these bodies of water, and how do we know that this radioactive material waste wont just spew back up somewhere else through geysers, or volcanoes. These people are crazy!!

      1. yes. or mix with the oil we make gas from and then run in our cars. that way it would spread world wide. Just another way to kill off more of us.

          1. Dennis Schum is a hero in my book. from what i read in the article you posted its too late to do anything. What I said earlier is already happening from what I can see. wow.

    1. Paul- I worked for a petro chemical manufacturer that used deepwell injections of hazardous waste. The well was an 8″ seamless pipe that ran 5000ft into the surface crust. Geologists’ sound images were able to determine that most ground water was more than 3000 feet above the injection point, and the head pressure of the pipe drove the liquid waste deep below the injection point into layers of rock/clay strata. Again this was not in the Ocean — it was inland and away from the coast. The trenches in this rad disposal method would be much deeper than the distance of the petro-chemical deepwell injections.

      1. so are you saying that the waste would never come back through geysers, and or volcanoes? I’m completely ignorant as to this method.

        1. In 30+ years, no, there has been no water or soil contamination. Ironically, the EPA wants to stop something that works, but will allow BP back into the Gulf to drill deepwells for oil. Go figure.

          1. hmmmm so no guarantee it wont cause other problems in the future. To me that’s unacceptable.

          2. “In 30+ years, no, there has been no water or soil contamination.”
            You’re kidding, aren’t you?
            That has been proven false.

            Paul, perhaps we should get Erin Brockovich’s input on that one. LOL 🙂 😉

          3. I digress… any type of toxic waste disposal is a crap shoot, and only as safe as the manufacturer or Government Agency monitoring it. I was correct about the deepwell injections of my prior employer, but was incorrect about the safety of this type of waste disposal. If you go to the bottom of the link below, it denotes several lawsuits that were filed against Plants using deepwells for disposal of toxic waste. This is part of the price we pay for the production of plastics.

            http://people.uwec.edu/piercech/HazwasteWebsSp04/DeepWellInjection/DeepWellInjection.htm

            I will always try to find a reaonable fix, but first we must fix the regulating agencies. Good luck with that. We’re right back where we started over 2-days ago with the discussion on New Mexico/Texas, and I still say it is futile to complain without a providing a resolution, or to fight against something you have no power to change. Our postings on this article support this assertion.

  3. To Paul and Angel-NYC

    I have posted a possible alternative to the failed Standard Operating Procedures industry uses today. Any fix would be astronomical in cost, but what price can you put on saving humanity from extinction? I felt that I was out of place yesterday and wanted to at least provide options to fix the problem before it gets any worse.

    I will probably tend to agree with Dennis Schum, regarding the possibility that it is already too late. Of course if the problem can be fixed, you would have to proceed with faith in the World Governments actually wanting to fix the problem, rather than the possibility that they purposely “created” the problem for nefarious purposes (E.g. population reduction). Unless you think these radiation releases really were accidental?

    You both made some excellent points regarding your doubts in this rad disposal method working — but I haven’t heard any suggestions from either of you regarding methods that may to fix the rad disposal problem.

    1. I honestly do not see a truly safe, economical mode of disposal, at this point. The only thing we can do is work to prevent further production and exposure (which the PTB will not allow because they make too much money from the production).

      1. The part of nuclear fuel waste, does not include radioactive solid waste: protective clothing, test equipment, old rad waste tanks, and interior containment process instruments which have been dismantled and removed.

    1. exactly marty wooton. when they were talking which way to go to produce energy years ago (solar verses nuclear) I couldn’t understand why they ultimately went with nuclear when solar produces no by products. Crazy people!!

      1. The horse has already got out of the open gate, or as I mentioned in another posting: Pandora’s Box is open. Again, if all of these incidents were done intentionally, then it doesn’t matter what fix we would come up with.

      2. Solar would have been great up until 1992 when they started spraying heavy metals into the stratosphere. There has been a 20% reduction in sunlight in just the last 20-years. Therefore, in 20 more years, with continued spraying, solar panels will be useless.

        1. of course. but spraying as far as i can remember wasn’t being done back then. And some are making progress as to photovoltaic technology is concerned. Efficiency out puts are increasing as they continue try new methods. also coal is in abundance here. There are already ways of scrubbing coal smoke out of the smoke stacks right now. As Angel says its all about the money.

          1. Aerosol spraying started in 1992 and has been steadily increased every year, more so after the HAARP was built. I haven’t noticed anything diminish with Chemtrails in the last 10 years, so we can contend that it shall continue.

  4. At first I thought this was a satire. Apparently not.

    Still like my 💡 better – dump it on the WH lawn.

    When that’s full, try the capital building next.

        1. I’ve seen all kinds of faces I can’t do…blushing, sunglasses, laughing, now the light bulb… I can only do 🙂 😉 🙁 :/

          1. oh yea THANKS DIGGER I printed that. now where did i put that paper, there it is. 😎

            8 )

  5. Yes, send it into the Earth’s crust. Great idea! NOT!

    Do they want to blow the entire planet up? If you send the nuclear waste to the Earth’s crust through the seawater, the shit will leak into the oceans even more than it already is.

    Why don’t they just send a nuclear bomb into the Earth’s crust and get it over with?

    We truly have a bunch of psychopaths in control of the world.

    1. When I worked in the oil industry in Houston, Texas, the New Hampshire and Massachusetts were fighting the construction of Nuke Plants and offshore drilling. The response to the protestors from the Nuke and Oil Industries: “F**k them; let New England freeze in the dark.”

      Many have attempted to live off the grid with solar and wind power; however, even living off the grid is becoming outlawed. You must be part of the PTB’s hive… no exceptions.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*