In light of the seemingly unending saber-rattling coming from North Korea, the US military is starting to make moves to prevent the rogue regime from launching anything toward America.
The DPRK (North Korea) has threatened a preemptive nuclear strike on the US and everyone is taking things a lot more seriously since the young successor Kim Jong Un is yet to be fully understood if that is possible:
North Korea threatened the United States on Thursday with a preemptive nuclear strike, raising the level of rhetoric as the U.N. Security Council approved new sanctions against the reclusive country.
The White House said North Korea’s threats would only lead to Pyongyang’s further international isolation and declared that the United States was “fully capable” of defending against any North Korean missile attack. (Read the rest here.)
Though the general wisdom says they cannot yet achieve a nuke launch that would reach us or that they could mount a nuclear warhead, some are not taking chances, just in case they are underestimating what the DPRK can do; this is a prudent, yet late move. This is doubly important since the North vows to vacate the 60 year old “Cease-Fire Treaty.”
That means the US is changing its deployments of missile intercepts and naval ability:
The U.S. is deploying 14 new ground-based missile interceptors in Alaska to counter renewed nuclear threats from North Korea and Iran, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said Friday.
The new interceptors will be based at Fort Greely, an Army launch site about 100 miles southeast of Fairbanks, Alaska, and are projected to be fully deployed by 2017, Hagel said.
The additions will bring the U.S.-based ground interceptor deployment from 30 to 44, including four that are based in California.
That will boost U.S. missile defense capability by 50 percent and “make clear to the world that the United States stands firm against aggression,” he said in a briefing at the Pentagon. (Read more here.)
The U.S. Navy’s hottest new ship and the centerpiece of its renewed focus on Asia isn’t its largest vessel, or its most technologically advanced. But it has advantages that its bigger siblings lack.
The 388-foot USS Freedom is small enough to move among the many islands and shallow waters of Southeast Asia, a trait that allows the Navy to train alongside similar-sized vessels in the region’s navies and build relationships with them. (Read more here.)
This is important as they continue maneuvers in South Korean waters and the DPRK is moving huge batteriesto challenge disputed islands above the 38th parallel, but still in South Korean waters. We must remember what the DPRK did in March of 2010 off the country’s west coast near Baengnyeong Island in the Yellow Sea where they sunk a South Korean ship named the Cheonan and shelled the island. The alert level is high and no one is sitting idly by:
WATERS TO THE EAST OF THE KOREAN PENINSULA (March 13, 2013) The guided-missile destroyer USS Fitzgerald (DDG 62), right, conducts tactical maneuvers with ships from the Republic of Korea Navy during exercise Foal Eagle. Foal Eagle is a series of 20 separate but inter-related joint and combined field training exercises conducted by Combined Forces Command and U.S. Forces Korea components spanning ground, air, naval, expeditionary, and special operations. Fitzgerald is part of forward deploy Destroyer Squadron 15, which operates from Yokosuka, Japan. (U.S. Navy photos by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Ricardo R. Guzman)
The chance that we are not fully aware of their true capabilities is a big question. Recent rhetoric from all sides is one thing, but the sense that we the public are not being made fully aware is also distinct because of moves being made.
Why do we say this? Well it turns out that the latest nuke test was much different than early reports indicated according to the Russians and the Obama Administration is making moves on previously requested and denied placements, but have just now been granted.
It is important to also remember that what happens with North Korea is not isolated to the Korean Peninsula. We have to always remember the ties with Iran and others, along with the whole macro concerning our ever weakening stance as the world’s sole super power. MG Vallely spoke of this disturbing aspect posted here on SUA from this week’s Newsmax interview.
Now it seems, plutonium is in the NK game, that alone is a game changer. Including the article below, also see this article by Bill Gertz on intercepting and defending against DPRK missiles here. Originally, the yield was estimated at a much lower level:
…the detonation—about 380 kilometers northeast of Pyongyang—touched off a seismic event measuring between magnitude 4.9 and 5.2, which corresponds to a weapon with an estimated explosive yield of six or seven kilotons, according to South Korea’s Defense Ministry, as reported by the Associated Press. The explosion surpasses the yield of North Korea’s 2009 nuclear test (estimated to have been between two and six kilotons) and a one-kiloton test in 2006. (Read morehere.)
Unfortunately, we have much more to fear, and it is a matter of much discussion what may lay ahead – it likely will not be just one theater and more likely, a concerted effort across the globe and Plutonium raises the ante to 20 kilotons. Please read on, you judge the situation:
The Big One
Russian government says N. Korean nuclear test used plutonium and was larger than earlier blasts
North Korea’s third underground nuclear test last month was fueled by plutonium and was not a device that used enriched uranium, according to the Russian government.
Retired Col. Gen. Viktor Yesin, a consultant to the Russian Defense Ministry and former commander of strategic nuclear forces, told the Washington Free Beacon that Russia’s government had obtained new details of the Feb. 12 underground test.
Yesin said the North Koreans’ most recent test blast was “an implosion-type nuclear explosive device that used plutonium for fissile material.”
Additionally, the test produced a larger nuclear yield than Pyongyang’s two earlier tests.
“In comparison to its previous nuclear tests of 2006 and 2009, this time North Korea tested a more powerful nuclear explosive device,” Yesin said. “According to the Russian Ministry of Defense it had an estimated yield of 10 to 20 kiloton”—the equivalent of 10,000 to 20,000 tons of TNT, he said.
South Koreans watched as the missile was prepared and away it went – successfully!
Yesin did not disclose how the Russian government was able to make the determination.
However, an intelligence source said the information was obtained by Russia’s SVR intelligence service, indicating it may have been provided by human agents rather than through technical means that can detect traces of radiation in the atmosphere after a test.
Yesin currently is a researcher at the state-run United States and Canada Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences in addition to advising the Russian Defense Ministry on nuclear and strategic issues.
An official of Russia’s atomic energy agency said after the February nuclear test that Moscow no longer had “working relations” with North Korean nuclear engineers or technicians.
However, a North Korean scientist is known to work at Russia’s Joint Institute of Nuclear Research near Moscow. U.S. officials identified the scientist, Li Je Sen, as the North Korean.
Russia operates three regional Special Control Service laboratories that are part of the 12th GUMO of the Defense Ministry, the unit in charge of Russia’s nuclear forces. The Russians also operate nuclear monitoring sensors in the Eastern Military District.
The office of the director of national intelligence stated in a short announcement the day of the nuclear test that U.S. intelligence “assesses that North Korea probably conducted an underground nuclear explosion in the vicinity of Punggye on Feb. 12, 2013.”
“The explosion yield was approximately several kilotons. Analysis of the event continues,” the ODNI statement said.
An ODNI spokesman had no information beyond the statement issued Feb. 12.
U.S. intelligence officials said that despite multi-billion dollar sensors and other equipment devoted to foreign nuclear monitoring spy agencies have been unable to determine either the type of nuclear fuel used in the blast or its yield.
Intelligence agencies are trying to determine if the latest underground test used highly enriched uranium that would indicate the North Koreans have developed a second path to a nuclear weapon by producing enriched uranium for weapons. North Korea’s arsenal is known to be based on plutonium pits for its nuclear weapons.
The intelligence failure also is a setback for international nuclear monitoring efforts and the Obama administration’s plan for a second attempt at Senate ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, considered a high priority of the president’s arms control agenda during his second term.
The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization, a group based in Vienna, Austria, set up under the CTBT, said Tuesday that a month after the North Korean test it was unable to find proof of a nuclear test from radioactive traces normally vented into the air.
As a result, the agency has been unable to determine the type of fissile material used in the blast.
The CTBTO has a network of international monitoring stations and its sensors failed to detect any traces of the test.
“It is very unlikely that we will register anything at this point … at this late stage,” CTBTO spokeswoman Annika Thunborg told Reuters News Agency.
One reason no traces of the test were detected is that North Korea may have taken steps to prevent venting in order to thwart international intelligence-gathering efforts.
A congressional aide said the test monitoring failure does not bode well for the administration’s efforts to seek Senate ratification of the test ban treaty.
“It’s clear from even the CTBTO that they haven’t collected the ‘smoking gun’ evidence of a test,” the aide said. “Just like in 2009. It goes to show that CTBT was a bad idea in 1999—when the Senate defeated it—and it’s a bad idea today.”
North Korea (DPRK) at night, from a satellite shot – it is dark, and if they go for it all, it will be dark for a much different reason.
The Senate voted down the treaty in 1999 after determining that the pact was not in the U.S. national security interest.
Due to a procedural move by Senate supporters, the treaty was withdrawn and thus can be ratified at a later time.
President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden have said since 2008 that they plan to again seek Senate ratification of the CTBT.
Many Republicans however, are opposing the idea, as banning tests under a treaty increases the risks for the reliability of the U.S. nuclear arsenal as it begins to be cut to 1,550 deployed strategic warheads under the 2010 New START arms treaty and as the president plans to seek a further one-third warhead cut in negotiations with Moscow.
“We are confident that the system works very well,” Thunborg said of CTBTO’s 270 monitoring stations.
According to U.S. officials, North Korea gave up plutonium production in 2007 under international pressure.
However, the North allowed visiting nuclear specialist Siegfried Hecker in 2010 to visit Pyongyang’s secret uranium enrichment facilities. The disclosure raised new concerns that the communist regime was running parallel nuclear programs to produce both plutonium and uranium cores for nuclear bombs.
North Korea recently ramped up threatening rhetoric against the United States and South Korea following the imposition of new United Nations sanctions on the country for its latest nuclear test.
The threats included warnings for the first time that the North will use nuclear-tipped missiles for strikes against the United States.
The regime also withdrew from the 1953 armistice with South Korea that ended hostilities during the Korean War and canceled a communications hotline.
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said at a briefing on security threats Tuesday that he is “very concerned about the actions of the new young leader … and the rhetoric that has been emanating from the North Korean regime.”
“The rhetoric, while it is propaganda-laced, is also an indicator of their attitude and perhaps their intent,” he said. “So for my part I am very concerned about what they might do and they are certainly, if they so chose could initiate a provocative action against the South.”
“There’s perhaps nowhere else on earth where the capacity to wreak enormous damage is matched by the possibility of North Korea using their nuclear weapons,” said Senate Intelligence Committee chairwoman Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.) during the annual threat briefing.