(Editor’s Note: This claim, that a photo used on a Policy Mic story and claimed to be from the Sandy Hook school shooting was actually used on this ABC news story from June 12th, 2012 from a hoax yacht explosion distress call from Sandy Hook, New Jersey. The two stories, with pictures, can be found here and here. Two photos, two ‘Sandy Hook’ hoaxes? Strange…)
This is the original photo posted on ABC News on June 12. This photo was also used for Sandy Hook elementary school by Policymic. They are busted!
N.J. Yacht Explosion Hoax Distress Call Released
The U.S. Coast Guard has released audio recordings of the distress call made by a man claiming to be the captain of a yacht that had explodedoff the coast of Sandy Hook, N.J. The call prompted the costly deployment of over 200 responders and a fleet of helicopters and boats into the Atlantic Ocean, before it proved to be a hoax.
Here is the same photo used on PolicyMic’s site about a month ago:
Adam Lanza is the Sandy Hook Shooter: New Reports Surface That Ryan Lanza is NOT the Mass Shooter
- Chris Miles
- in
- Politics,
- Guns
- 1 month ago
The details of who, exactly, the Sandy Hook Elementary shooter IS are still massively conflicting.
It is now being reported by some outlets that Adam Lanza, 20, (NOT Ryan Lanza, as we’ve previously reported) reportedly shot his mother — who is a teacher — dead and targeted her kindergarten class at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.
This significantly conflicts with other reports.
Police in Hoboken, N.J., are questioning his brother Ryan Lanza (originally reported as the shooter?), 24; the New York Post says he is not a suspect.
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/01/sandy-hook-photo-from-june-20-2538174.html
Didn’t see the photo on the yacht story.
Can anybody verify?
http://abcnews.go.com/US/jersey-yacht-explosion-hoax-distress-call-released/story?id=16546583#.UWQY3DVGJ5Q
This was the second photo, on the yacht story.
Sandy Hook – Damning Evidence – One By One the Lies are Exposed
On the police scanner it says there is NO surveilance video. Check the police scanner #5 download and listen to the 4 minute mark. There are two links for you to http://try. tiny.cc/lbyhuw and https://docs.google.com/folder/d/0B-YeEgq5sO7NU2U5N1lyeVJIbjA/edit
The file name is “Sandy Hook Police Scanner 5.mp3”
If there’s NO video then what the hell are they hiding? This raises the question “how safe are schools”. It also begs the question “why wasn’t there any surveillance video?” This is why there’s a serious need for an inquiry into Sandy Hook and school safety. Every corner store, confectionery and 7/11 has video surveillance but Sandy Hook didn’t? If a video surveillance system wasn’t installed at the school then there’s a possible liability issue here. To quote the Officer in the recording he says ” there is no video” and he repeats it twice. Without surveillance video the only evidence left is hear-say. One source says there’s no video and the other says there is a video. Why would Malloy and Sedensky say there is a video? Are they confused? Don’t they know? Who ‘s telling the truth? This is a major discrepency in the story. Are they going to tell us the scanner frequencies got crossed up again like the Rodia Licence plate numbers? What will be the excuse this time?
What about the missing 911 calls? Some say Sally Cox made the first 911 call. Do they exist? Attorney Sedensky said he never heard the 911 calls. It’s all starting to look like a white-wash. So who has heard the 911 recording? Has anyone heard them???
The story has flip flopped so many times how are we to believe anything they tell us. If that recording exists it’s evidence that is crucial to the investigation and a school safety hearing. I would suggest that everyone download all the mp3’s on the site I linked to above and listen carefully. They even mention the van.
Someones not telling the truth, If I was a parent of kids that were going to a Connecticut school or any school I would be pushing for transparency.
Here’s another link you may find interesting http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEkc9XzLRYM
The Sandy Hook Shooting Anniversary – For Six Deadly Minutes They Waited.
“LET’S NOT SEND THEM IN YET” the dispatcher said……
The Newtown police arrived at the school about four minutes after the first 911 call, around 9:40 am according to a summary report released Wednesday. But then they waited outside for nearly six minutes while trying to figure out if there was a second shooter, according to a prosecutor’s report issued last week. Then there’s this puzzling statement by the dispatcher “well, let’s not send them in yet”. http://www.deseretnews.com/article/765642756/Newtown-to-release-911-calls-from-school-shooting.html
Even though it took only 4 minutes for police to reach the school they stalled for 6 more minutes after they arrived while shots were still being fired inside. According to the report “It’s not clear whether the delay made a difference because Lanza killed himself one minute after the first officer arrived on the scene”. REALLY??? I don’t think so.
Adam Lanza (sim) didn’t kill himself until later on when the police began to close in on him and were within feet of him. That was sometime between the last known shots at 9:46 and 9:51 when officers yelled “man down”. Does it matter? Not if it was a hoax but if this was a real event, as they would like you to believe, then this is a very embarrassing mistake that makes police officers look unprepared and unproffessional. Could this be why they sealed the 911 calls and delayed the report?
Fact is 6 minutes is a long time when you consider kids are dying and in desperate need of immediate medical attention. Seconds count in a medical emergency. This is a major embarassment to both CSP and Newtown police and they know it. To add to matters EMS were not allowed in the building even after the school was cleared. Sedensky knew these questions would surface when the report was released and this is why he with-held the 911 calls and the report. Think about the damage done to their credibility.
Obviously, they are more concerned about their own reputation than they were about the safety of the children. Who knows how many lives could have been saved if they had gone in 6 minutes earlier? This is the burning question, at least for those that don’t think it’s a hoax. As for me, I think it was a hoax but either way the 6 minutes will be the big question on everyone’s mind. It makes you wonder why the mainstream media is not addressing this delay of 6 minutes and it also makes you wonder why there are no lawsuits. Consider the shooting spree itself was only 5 minutes. Now add another 6 minutes on top of that. We are talking about a lot of potential for damage while officers waited outside the school. Everyone should be asking why. How many lives could have been saved? The media should be asking about this delay. Why aren’t they?
Why isn’t mainstream media even touching this subject???
Another important question is “when did Connecticut State Police arrive”. The innitial comunication indicates they are already there because they said ” the State police is there.” [call 3] Then one State police officer asks “how close are you guys to arriving on scene.”[call 5] Finally Newtown dispatch calls State police and State police say they already know about the shooting and that “helps coming”.[call 5] Does this make any sense to you? Read over these call entries and then read my take on it below….
Call 3 – starts at 9:36:13 a.m and ends 3 minuts 52 seconds later or 9:40:05
OPERATOR 1: John, I need you to call the state police. Just,..
OPERATOR 3: The state police is there.
Call 5 – starts at 9:40:02 am…………..
OPERATOR STATE POLICE: How close are you guys to arriving on scene?
OPERATOR NEWTOWN: What?
OPERATOR STATE POLICE: How close are you guys to . . .?
Apparently Newtown doesn’t respond to this request but instead they reply with…….
OPERATOR NEWTOWN: A female shot, uh, in the foot. You got a female party shot in the foot.
Call 5 – again………………
NEWTOWN OPERATOR: Hey, it’s Brophy from Newtown 911, how are you?
OPERATOR STATE POLICE: Good.
NEWTOWN OPERATOR: Did you guys hear what’s going on in Newtown right now?
OPERATOR STATE POLICE: There’s an active shooting.
NEWTOWN OPERATOR: Yeah, you got it.
OPERATOR STATE POLICE: O.K.
NEWTOWN OPERATOR: All right.
OPERATOR STATE POLICE: Yeah, help’s coming.
Continued……….
By omission, this last entry indicates to me that CSP doesn’t want Newtown dispatch to know they’re already at the school, otherwise, why would he say “helps coming”. Remember State police had already reported finding a victim shot in the foot earlier. Either this is Hammond or it’s the mystery teacher who wasn’t identified. This is near the beginning of call 5, around 9:40 am. That’s when the State operator says “This is the state police. I got a victim of the shooter here.” So we know State police were there already. And shortly before that a Newtown dispatcher says “the State police is there” [call 3].
Wouldn’t it make more sense if the State operator had said “yes we’re aware of the situation and state police officers are already at the school instead of saying “help’s coming”? It sounds like there’s no cooperation between the State operator and Newtown.
In one of the recordings released Wednesday Newtown dispatchers were heard frantically trying to call Connecticut state police but there was no answer . One of the three unanswered calls rang for at least 50 seconds. State police finally picked up on the fourth call but they had already been dispatched to the school by the time those calls were made, according to official call logs.
The State operator also asks “how close are you guys to arriving on scene”. Newtown dispatch doesn’t respond to the query. Finally Brophy of Newtown calls State police to let them know but the State operator tells Newtown they already know there’s a shooting in progress. Yes, they knew allright. Connecticut State Police had a front row seat.
I still believe CSP were already there the whole time. They only asked where Newtown police were to keep tabs on their location, worried perhaps, that Newtown police would mess up their plans, which is exactly what happened. When Newtown cops arrived through the boiler room entrance they surprise Rick Thorne. Now Sedensky has to explain away all these inconsistancies and reconcile the fact that Newtown Police waited a full 6 deadly minutes before entering the school.
And why bother answering the phone when it’s a drill and you’re already there? Isn’t call display Kool?
If you think all of this is a hoax why would any of this even matter?
It matters because this adds one more piece to the puzzle and every new piece further discredits the official story.
“Everyone Must Check In”
http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Full-transcript-of-the-Sandy-Hook-911-calls-5036086.php
http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/editorials/hc-ed-sandy-hook-report-20131125,0,3905746.story
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/911-recordings-sandy-hook-shootings-released-article-1.1536629
http://www.wrdw.com/home/headlines/Newtown-911-dispatcher-urged-callers-to-take-cover-234467551.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3098558/posts?page=27
http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/12/05/newtown-911-calls-released
http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-sandy-hook-report-released1126-20131125,0,6858144.story?page=2
http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/newtown-sandy-hook-school-shooting/hc-sandy-hook-shooter-writings-20131130,0,6378499.story
The book of Granny: http://www.courant.com/media/acrobat/2013-11/264069560-25144246.pdf
PS: It recently came to my attention that Newtown government officials have asked that the media stay clear of their town when it marks the first anniversary of the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School.
“The community is choosing to remember and honor those who lost their lives in the Sandy Hook tragedy in ways that are quiet, personal and respectful,” Newtown first selectman Pat Llodra said in a written statement;
Should we forget veterans day and remembrance day too?
I find this very strange in light of the fact that the families were not the least bit camera shy immediatly following the event. In fact some of them actively sought public attention and promoted new gun laws and do you remember all the media events scheduled for the family like football games and the trips to Washington?
Now that the hoax is exposed they just want to sweep it all under the rug.
Maybe I am wrong but that’s the way it looks to me.
Are there really any heros in this story?
According to officials 27 people died at Sandy Hook on Dec 14 2012. It’s possible the casualty count was higher because police waited outside the school. There are still a lot of burning questions, that need answering and I will not apologize for asking them. And if we don’t ask questions then what are the lessons to be learned from Sandy Hook?
Yes, I am still torn by this event not knowing for sure who to believe or what really happened but I do know there’s a coverup. Their actions just reinforces my suspicions . The good news is, every day we shed more light on this story we come that much closer to the truth. Keep the faith.
NO SECRETS
“God bless the rich, the poor, the genius and the fool for am I no better than any. I am just a truth seeker.”
Did you forget about the maroon van that had the back window shot out, the driver of which was arrested in a nearby town? Or the blue car in the parking lot with the bullet trajectory out, as in the shot was fired from within the car? The guy in cammo in the woods? Now there’s two additional arrests. Who were these fellas? And considering the importance, what is their life story?
The corpse, if there was one, of the perpetrator, if there was one, had in his wallet Adam Lanza’s brother’s license whom he hadn’t seen for two years.
This was a Hollywood production, and a lousy one at that.
Servitude 101
The lessons we were supposed to learn from Sandy Hook.
1 – That guns are bad
2 – That conspiracy theorists are bad
3 – That home-schooling is a dangerous practice and must end
4 – That some medical conditions lead to violent behavior but this can be remedied by clipping a few strands off your DNA
5 – That parents are legally responsible for their child’s criminal actions
6 – That more surveillance is required to make everyone safe from criminals (can we predict people like Adam are dangerous?)
7 – That more supervision is required for the mentally ill and more programs are needed to support them (more interventions)
8 – That the public is not required to know the details surrounding this crime or any other violent crime
9 – That you should not question the official story (unless you want to end up like Micheal Hastings or Paul Walker)
10 – That asking questions can land you in jail: ie: Remember when Scotty Walker called Wayne Carver’s office
11 – That government officials will take care of you so don’t worry (just drink your Kool-Aid)
12 – That the media makes mistakes but corrections are not required (hardly anyone will notice anyway)
13 – That we must destroy a school and everything that reminds us of this violent crime
(and then rebuild the school in the exact same place)
14 – That more censorship of the internet is required to protect us from bad people
15 – That victim’s feelings trump everything else (the law, freedom of information and even kids safety)
16 – That officials can whip up new laws on the fly to suit the crime and the occasion
17 – That police officers and EMS suffer from post traumatic stress but not teachers and students apparently
18 – That lawsuits are not required in some circumstances like violent school shootings
19 – Donations will fix the problem
20 – Your government cares
I hope my sarcasm isn’t taken the wrong way. Have a Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays !