SilencerCo One On One : Donald Trump Jr.


Published on Sep 26, 2016 by SilencerCo

SilencerCo’s CEO Joshua Waldron recently had the opportunity to meet with a prominent public figure of the 2016 presidential race: Donald Trump Jr.

He sat down with Mr. Trump to discuss issues that hit close to home for all of us and to get an up-close, personal look at what his father would fight for should he win the presidency.

At SilencerCo, we feel that we all must take a stand for what we believe in, and make our voices heard on November 8 to protect the 2nd Amendment that we hold so dear.

We are honored that Mr. Trump came out to visit SilencerCo and wish him, his father, and his family the best in the coming weeks.

Want to see the entire, uncut interview? Click https://silencerco.com/trumpjr

11 thoughts on “SilencerCo One On One : Donald Trump Jr.

  1. Talk is cheap, more so in this day in age where google/facebook can study us in real time and adjust their rhetoric. Sorry but Trump’s “no fly, no buy” comment was not in line with the second amendment.

      1. A real patriot could never make such a statement, I don’t hear any Republicans discussing repealing firearms laws and wasn’t it under Reagan that we lost the ability to own class 3 automatic firearms made after 1984? Didn’t Bush pass a law in 2004 banning imports being brought here as complete firearms?

        1. It was 1986, but yes, that happened under Reagan. “Civilians” can still legally buy auto weapons, but to be “legal” they have to have been manufactured prior to some date in 1986. This artificially limits the supply of legally-transferrable auto weapons, so their price is ridiculously inflated.

          Although I personally think that full-auto fire is pointless from rifles like ARs and AKs, select-fire rifles are absolutely covered by the Second Amendment. Besides, burst fire can be of use from heavier belt-fed weapons, and those also fall under the protection of the 2nd. The 1986 law is one of the more outrageous violations of the Bill of Rights currently on the books.

          Fortunately, that 1986 ban is moot now, as a bumpfire stock essentially converts a rifle to full-auto with zero paperwork. I’ve played around with those stocks and have also shot true select-fire weapons. They basically do the same thing. But since quick, precise targeting is so important in this age of body armor, I prefer a good semi-auto trigger (like Geissele makes) and tons of practice.

          1. I have a CMC 3.5lb drop in trigger in my AR15 and my Rem700’s stock trigger is super lite, maybe 2lbs.

  2. “There’s no better person than your father to protect the Second Amendment.”

    Couldn’t disagree more. He’s already proposed violations of the Second, Fourth, Eighth and probably more, as well as being an ardent supporter and great friend to the very same who have spearheaded the incessant attacks on the Bill of Rights.

    WE are the protectors of it, because no one they put in office is going to work for US.

  3. *** At SilencerCo, we feel that we all must take a stand for what we believe in, and make our voices heard on November 8 to protect the 2nd Amendment that we hold so dear. ***

    Yeah, it’s all well and good to support the 2nd Amendment. But what about the other ones? There’s no point in having gun rights if you’re willing to give up your other essential rights like a submissive little bitch.

    1. Totally agree

      although i would like to add

      If they feel the need to hold our other rights in check..than… we will than take them, using our 2nd amendment to extract the remaining rights from their cold dead hands

  4. It is so hard to even fathom how these people think, since I can’t ever imagine my rights coming from anywhere other than the creator.

    Gun laws? 2nd Amendment rights? what the f’k is any of that supposed to mean, that my rights are some how recognized and allowed by Government?

    Their recognition or acknowledgement means nothing…your papers are worthless, your statements are hallow…enough with these snake tongued authoritarians….

    I can’t recognize these people and their treasured government believing that there can be limitations on my rights.

    One must validate with sworn testimony and evidence that I have harmed them or their property or utilized fraud in any contract or agreement with them or anyone for that matter, in order to even engage me or have recourse against me in the public commons.

    These people believe that we are somehow obligated to live under and follow what their version of freedom is….

    I really could care less what they mean by Law Abiding citizens….it is different than what most here think, as free men and women, the Bill of rights is not for us, it is to restrict this psychotic group of humans from us, who use Government against us.

    Big Daddy Trumpraeli believes in Stop and Frisk, and has stated he believes it is a good “law”…… Now that is 100% contrary to the Bill of rights and freedom….

    IF El Trumpo actually abolishes the IRS and Fed Reserve, and every other Unconstitutional Agency in existence, all while ordering all agents and employees of the Fed Gov back to D.C. which is the only place their claimed authority is to exist as I understand it, then, maybe, I might watch him closer as someone who actually wants to return this country to a free sovereign nation of individuals.

    Will never happen, and even if that fantasy was true, it wouldn’t be allowed to happen by the obvious elephants in the room…whom in turn are the ones that has allowed him to become head puppet in chief….it’s over, they’re just buying time with these sell outs.

    More pablum for the masses….

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*