Video: Susan Lindauer On Advanced Knowledge of 911

Keeping this article on top as per several requests.

Video Rebel’s Blog – by horse237

Susan Lindauer used to be Senator Ron Wyden’s press secretary. She worked as a back channel representing the CIA and the DIA from 1995 to 2003 with Libya and Iraq before being arrested under the Patriot Act. I have written down her salient points from the video below with my comments in in parentheses. Her video is a little too long for most people to appreciate.

911 put the military establishment in charge of our country. (Not exactly. The military and NSA work for the bankers who have run America since 1913.)  

911 changed the civil rights of America.

Susan Lindauer was imprisoned on secret charges using secret evidence under the Patriot Act. Michael Mukasey was her judge. Mukasey was the judge for the five dancing Israelis who were arrested on 911 while filming the WTC attack which demonstrated their prior knowledge of the greatest crime in American history. Mukasey  subsequently became the Attorney General. (He is Jewish.) She was held in prison without a trial and without the ability to seek a trial.

She opposed the Iraq sanctions which had killed 1.7 to 2.1 million people.

She was sent by the CIA and later the DIA as a back channel to negotiate an end to sanctions and the normalization of relations. She represented her handlers with the Libyans and the Iraqis from 1995 to 2003. On the day the Libyans handed over two men in connection with the Lockerbie bombing she found someone had ripped out the ceiling tiles in her basement and left 12 audio wires hanging. The Government later said she was insane because she believed people were listening to her conversations and spying on her.

The Iraqis agreed to weapons inspections. Six months before 911 the Iraqis offered  to let the FBI send a task force to collect evidence on terrorism and to make arrests on Iraqi soil of terror suspects.

Iraq offered unlimited oil sales. They offered preferential contracts for the reconstruction of Iraq. Iraq offered to buy a million American cars a year from American factories and not just US labels made overseas. This would have saved the auto industry. George Bush was made aware of these offers as Andy Card, Bush’s Chief of Staff, was Susan’s cousin. She made 11 reports to the CIA. She sent Andy Card 11 letters from November 2000 to December 2001. (The problem is that these offers were not made known to the American public and to our allies overseas.) She also contacted Colin Powell and even tried to warn him off prior to his testimony at the UN.

In April of 2001 her CIA handler, Dr Richard Fuisz, sent her to the Iraqi delegation at the UN to deliver a message. It specifically involved airplane hijackings with the World Trade Center as a target. The message included a threat of war if the attacks happened and it was discovered that Iraq had withheld any information from us. Iraq’s response was to repeat the offer to let the FBI investigate in Baghdad. Dr Fuisz did not like her soft approach and ordered her to go back with a stronger war message if the WTC Towers were struck. Dr Fuisz wanted actionable intelligence including airports and flight numbers threatening war if the Iraqis did not come forth. He had her tell the Iraqis that the threat came from Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld. The administration had decided in April of 2001 that they would invade Iraq if this attack occurred. (US allies were hearing from the administration during the summer of 2001 that they had already decided to invade Afghanistan. This was before 911.)

In June and July of 2001 Susan Lindauer and Dr Fuisz talked every week about the attack on the WTC. On August 2, 2001 she discussed with Dr Fuisz the nomination of Robert Mueller to head the FBI. They said there never was a terrorist investigation that Robert Mueller hadn’t thrown. She said that if this terrorist attack on New York did occur he will throw this one too. Dr Fuisz said there might not even be an FBI Director because this attack (on the WTC with hijacked planes) was imminent.

On August 4th Susan went to New York and asked the Iraqis for any intelligence they had. They had none. On August 6th she reported this to Dr Fuisz. On that same day the CIA presented a memo to the President saying an attack was imminent. Dr Fuisz also told her on August 6th  to contact the Attorney General’s office and ask for an Emergency Broadcast Alert  to be sent through all agencies asking for reports on any information on a possible terrorist attack. She did that but they told her to contact the Office of Counter Terrorism.

She believes the WTC buildings were wired for demolition between August 23rd and September 4th based upon what she had been told by the CIA. She believes there were airplane hijackings. She also said that the Israelis, Egyptians, Germany, Pakistan and the Jordanians had some measure of foreknowledge of the 911 attacks. (I believe the airplanes were hijacked electronically and that the 19 Arab CIA assets were used to create false evidence of a terrorist attack.)

Lindauer believes the media is complicit in the dumbing down of America.

On 911 Mossad agents filmed the 911 attacks. Also on 911 Dr Fuisz told Susan he was watching a video of the planes hitting the North and South Towers sent by the Israelis. George Bush said he saw the North Tower hit by a plane on 911. The public did not see that video until 9-12-2001. She said our government could have stopped the planes. (The electronically hijacked planes flew over 8 US air bases without intervention.)

She does not believe a plane hit the Pentagon. Her DIA handler Paul Hoven was convinced that the Oklahoma City bombing of April 19, 1995 was wired from inside the building and that a truck bomb alone was insufficient to cause the resulting damage.

After 911 the Iraqis offered financial documents on Al Qaeda which could have crippled their organization. The US refused the offer.

Two months after 911 Dr Fuisz received 13 million dollars from the 911 investigation fund. He said he was going to call his architect and build a mansion. She said she needed money to get information from the Iraqis on terrorists operating inside America. He said Absolutely Not. He kept the money and paid no tax on it.

She tried to speak up after 911. She offered to testify about pre-911 intelligence, peace offers and negotiations. She called the offices of John McCain and Trent Lott because they were the Gatekeepers. To testify before the Senate committee you had to got through them. Thirty days after contacting the Senate she was arrested under the Patriot Act in March of 2004. She was declared incompetent to stand trial. The government maintained her desire to pursue witnesses and leads in her defense qualified as a mental defect. She was held under indictment for the next five years with no trial and no hearing. If she agreed to plead guilty, she would be ruled to be sane. She was held in a Texas military base for one year. The government petitioned to hold her for 10 years without trial. The government also petitioned to drug her until she recanted her claim to be a CIA asset. On the day her judge retired he released her from prison. That was five days before Obama’s inauguration.

She said the New York Times wrote a scathing article about her despite having verified her veracity through 4 sources. Amy Goodman of Democracy Now refused to cover her imprisonment. (She does not seem to realize that the Ashkenazi Times does not care about companies like Halliburton but does care about Israel.) She did say America is making foreign policy that is good for other nations but not for us without mentioning Israel.

She did not want to accuse any one group of doing 911 but did say you should ask yourself who benefited.

She said that MI 6 is far more brutal than the CIA in terms of their willingness to assassinate people. She said she would not go to Great Britain in the next ten years.

I have written of her before. She is the author of Extreme Prejudice and is one of the few people with inside knowledge of 911 who is talking to us. She turned down a lawsuit for damages because it would have required her to be silent. None of us can afford to remain silent in these times.

As a public figure, she is more restricted in what she is permitted to say than most of us are. Please remember Michael Hastings’ fate before criticizing her.

http://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2013/08/14/video-susan-lindauer-on-advanced-knowledge-of-911/