Agenda 21: How Globalist Domination Happens on a Local Level

Occupy Corporatism  Agenda 21 wants to, among other things, bring the American lands back to rewilding.

The non-governmental organization (NGO) The Wildlands Project (WP) is a focusing of the American landscape in preservation for “future generations to inherit a continent rich in wildlife, with plenty of room for all species to roam.”

This does not necessarily mean that there will be room for humans as we are seeing massive areas of land being placed under restrictions called “conservation easements”, “scenic byways”, “protected areas”, “biosphere reserves”, “wildlife refuges”, etc. The names are varied and plentiful, but the result is always the same: More government control; less human freedom.

The WP claims we are “experiencing the Sixth Great Extinction” because of “human population growth, climate change, resource extraction, new recreational technologies, habitat fragmentation”. Since humanity is not a “highly interactive species” (meaning species whose presence maintains the balance of other plant and animal species with the habitat they share) “we are running out of room to share with nature”.

The science-based agenda of WP has developed the solution of dividing up North America into “four Continental Wildways [of] large protected corridors of land running coast to coast . . . throughout Canada, the US and Mexico.” Agenda 21 explains why the North American Union is being pushed by the globalists.

  •  The Eastern Wildway extending northward from the Everglades along the Appalachians to the Arctic
  •   The Western Wildway spanning the continent from Mexico, through the Rockies, to Alaska
  •   The Pacific Wildway running from Baja to Alaska
  •   The Boreal Wildway running west-east from Alaska to the Canadian Maritimes across the forest roof of North America

The wildways are “constructed by protecting core areas connected to one another by corridors or linkages. They are essentially mosaics of connected public and private lands that provide habitat and safe passageways for wildlife to travel freely from place to place.”

In the January 2012 Review of Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Rio Principles details the progress the UN has had on their Agenda 21 policies on the local and national levels.

Under the World Trade Organization (WTO) the UN has seen major advances in the developing countries (i.e. Africa, India, Southeast Asia) where they have “embraced the reforms of the WTO regime” where “global import tariffs” have been used as protective measures since 1995.

National subsidies have turned “agricultural commodities” over to the global Elite International cooperation and recognition of the UN’s superiority in the implementation of their schemes. Through the World Bank (WB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the manipulation of the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI) uses reinvested funds that are dumped into UN approved public service programs, healthcare and education.

According to research from the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) the issues caused by man-made climate change and its impact on the environment cannot be resolved by a single country or member of academia, but through the IIASA and the UN the securitization of energy on a national level can be reworked to reflect Agenda 21 Sustainable Development.

IIASA research has turned up a strategic plan that:

  •  Controls the allocation of energy to individuals and businesses
  •   Control transportation and production of global food
  •   Control water resources used for agriculture and personal
  •   Allocate resources under UN guidelines of mitigation of CO2 emissions

Research focuses on the “transformational nature of the modern world.” IIASA is one of the foundations of the global transformation of local communities to reflect Agenda 21.

One way Agenda 21 is manifesting right now is in Transition Towns . Under the Transition Model , global relocalization agendas are forefront.

The dangers that Transition Towns impose on our sovereignty and individuality are:

  •  Refocus town planning and infrastructure on implementation of Agenda 21
  •   Appear to be grassroots operations
  •   Promote the Peak Oil mythology as an energy scare-tactic
  •   Support SmarthGrowth which is code for Agenda 21
  •   Aspire to control framing, disburse ability to farm, and pressure governmental policies on farming that reflect Agenda 21
  •   Use the hoax of man-made climate change as the purpose for imposing policy control by building cities that are designed to reduce carbon emissions
  •   Securitize local food stores, businesses, healthcare and fuel
  •   Ensure SmarthGrowth controls all citizens ability to acquire any needs for human survival
  •   Create internal advocacies that band together to purvey Transition Town propaganda to elected officials and local governments

The European Union has adopted regulations that ban the construction of single-family homes beginning in 2020. These new dwellings, called passive houses will be “zero-energy buildings”. To control urban communities in so far as “tangible spatial” development and the literal process of construction, Germany is creating policies that facilitate “compact” housing that is more “energy efficient”.

During the recent UN Earth Summit on Sustainable Development in Rio+20, governments and private sector corporations have pledged to fund the UN’s endeavors toward global governance with a generous $513 billion for Agenda 21 projects that will restrict the movements of humans, perverse biodiversity and assist the UN in attaining their Millennium Development Goals.

Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State supports the incorporation of the Agenda 21 movement. She remarked that “sustainability won’t happen without business investment. Governments alone cannot solve all the problems we face, from climate change to persistent poverty to chronic energy shortages. That’s why we are so strongly in favor of partnerships.”

As far as UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is concerned, the money from corporations and governments cannot come at a better time. Ki-moon claims that “words must translate into action” with regard to moving the environmental governance agenda forward.

Ki-moon says that since the first UNCSD, the incremental slide toward total global governance has spawned UN conventions on climate change, biodiversity and desertification, as well as the Agenda 21 blueprint for sustainable development, yet “progress has been too slow – we have not gone far enough down the road. We are now in sight of a historic agreement – the world is waiting to see if words will translate into action, as we know they must.”

The UN Environmental Program (UNEP) has been expanded to become a “specialized agency” with a new title, UN Environmental Organization (UNEO). The UNEO will prop up the Sustainable Development division of the UN. The same agency that disseminates Agenda 21 policies to governments will be centralized into a global agency with powerful international backing.

Ban Ki-moon, UN Secretary General devised the global sustainability panel that includes more than 50 supporters of the creation of UNEO.

“One option is the possible transformation of UNEP into a specialized agency of the United Nations. A strengthened UNEP could enhance coherence between relevant multilateral environmental agreements, and better integrate its work with the activities of development institutions, especially the United Nations Development Program,” states one recommendation.

To fund globalization, the UN will disburse a global carbon tax, redistribute the world’s wealth and install programs that will place all issues concerning humanity, poverty, the securitization of resources and education under its control and command.

They will force ecological taxes to steer large amounts of money into funds designed to redesign humanity, civilization and the planet – and fit them all into their mold. A carbon cap-and-trade tax system for industrial countries could yield $250 billion per year.

Through consolidation of power within the UN, the Agenda 21 scheme is being implemented locally; and finding success as fake grassroots efforts. The global Elite have perfected the art of convincing the general public that sustainability is a good idea. By employing them to pressure their local and state governments for adherence to UN Agenda 21 schemes, their work is easy. It is up to us to recognize that the sustainable legislation we are unknowingly pushing our elected officials to approve are contributing to the loss of our independence and sovereignty as a Constitutional Republic governed by our own laws.

Once we do this, we will no longer be manipulated into supporting the UN’s global governance agenda and once again be a free nation.

7 thoughts on “Agenda 21: How Globalist Domination Happens on a Local Level

  1. “The European Union has adopted regulations that ban the construction of single-family homes beginning in 2020.”

    How sick can you be? This, like everything else the EU does, will probably extend the same policy over here in the U.S. So much for “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness or Property”. And what is even more sick is that people like Hitlary Clinton or the British Prime Minister will be exempt from this rule because, well….their “Special”, while the rest of us lay people have to suffer.

  2. Great article, but failed to mention one of the top ‘ecological terrorist’ organizations, the WWF (World Wildlife Fund), run by that model of humanitarianism, David Mayer de Rothschild. (By the way, they sued the World Wrestling Federation for those initials, you can guess who won.)

  3. This may sound silly, but these initiatives are thought up by globalist communists (like Soros) who are patiently planning to get us all into inner city beehives with total dependence upon government for all of our food, water & transportation.
    When total dependence happns, total control follows.
    Doubt this? Look at how much effort the government is directing towards home gardening, raw milk & water collection.
    Just say no to living in a government beehive (and disarming)

  4. Ridiculous! We Americans have unlimited resources! We are Americans, which means we have all the land, all the oil, all the everything we need, forever!

    Why should we be forced to live by so-called rational forces like shortages due to overpopulation? Poppycock!

    We need make NO changes to our lifestyle. We can continue our rapid, unplanned expansion forever. No planning needed!

  5. Living in a very scenic area, I have seen so-called local efforts to set aside much of the land as a “Designated Scenic Area” and in the process certain private land ownership would be threatened severely. Words like “Smart Growth” and “sustainable development” have been tossed around by our City Council frequently.

    In fact, a few years ago a very concerted effort was made to force so-called “affordable housing” on the citizenry. It was turned down after much rebuke on our part, because the goal was to congregate the locals eventually into mass housing projects. Agenda 21 was never mentioned, per se, but it was, and is, a vital part of the planning.

  6. Living in Europe, most of this sustainable development rethoric is not new to me. It started from the beginning of the 90’s and found its way in media, education, …

    Two years ago I went to a meeting of a transition group. It appealed to me because of its message of wanting to build a better world connecting with each other, disconnecting partly from centralized political and economical power structures by independant ‘sustainable’ farming/action, because of their grassroots approach, etc…

    Sounds wonderful, but I had my doubts! Why? Because of its 2 premises:

    Why transition? Because we have ‘global warming’ and ‘peak oil’. I don’t know much about the validity of ‘peak oil’ (though I do think there are much better existing energy resources and a whole range of unexplored models of free energy to focus on), but I do know ‘global warming’ is major BS. When I tried to communicate this gently (it was the time of climate gate 1), I was blocked off and got some hostile reactions.

    Most of their message sounded allright, but their premises were dogmatic and the thought of me entering a cult swept through my head.

    Later I got to know about Agenda 21 and how a nation can be ‘brainwashed’ by using subversion techniques on a whole generation

    An ‘ahaaa’-moment occured.

    How come when you talk and provide arguments about the theoretical possibility of free energy and provide evidence of small scale models already running, these otherwise wonderful people get a blank stare or turn almost hostile. Some of them who do acknowledge this possibility react in a horse slain way that we can’t change anything about that, that the ‘powers that want to be (ptw)’ won’t allow this. If that’s the case, why are they in a movement that seems to be a threat to the tpw. What do they hope to achieve then?

    Like this article stated maybe it’s because they aren’t a real threat. They’re helping without realizing they are being used and are unable to see it (mind control has kicked in deeply). They perpetuate the washing of brains believing that they are doing something positive (which is partly true) and everybody who thinks differently is a nuissance, in the long run a threat.

    Imagine these communities existing in 10 years from now, getting international political UN support (though it all seems locally). Everything seems wonderful as long as you comply. Individuals who might have another opinion are being warned of their unsustainable thoughts or actions and should be eradicated. Yikes, this looks a bit like those dystopian 70’s sci-fi movies.

    I hope to see a movement with people thinking for themselves, being able to accept the whole picture (if that’s possible at all)… or at least the bigger picture, leading to mutual connection, free from induced mind fear, without denying the sometimes frightening ‘bigger truth’. Then the stories of being a catholic, a kundalini hippie, a constitutionalist, a democrat, a businessman, … will eventually take second place (maybe even disappear) to being ‘a connected human’.

    Division is a tool necessary to find our way in this world, to have an identity to play in this playground called ‘world’ but we are in a situation were the tool is being replaced by the idea that we have become that tool (we’ve identified with it)… which results into being maipulated tools in the schemes of the ptw.

    So I say: No more division, no more ptw dividing & conquering our minds and hearts!

  7. Good point, Conect Ion. I too joined my local Transition group but felt that something was a bit wrong with the whimsical apathy towards needing ‘permission’ from local government for everything, seeking approval like a bunch of kids… all seemed a bit wrong; despite the undeniable ‘good things’ the group stood for, it just lacked the power… and as such is highly open to subtle redirection. Well said and keep your eyes (especially the third one) open!

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published.