listen here

Or you can mail donations to Henry Shivley at P.O. Box 964, Chiloquin, OR 97624

As lava destroys Hawaii homes, owners ask: Am I covered?

Mail.com

HONOLULU (AP) — Patricia Deter moved from Oregon to Hawaii to be closer to her two daughters, but the Kilauea volcano burned down her home only a month after she bought it. Now Deter and others who have recently lost homes to the lava-spewing mountain are on an urgent quest for answers about insurance, desperate to learn whether their coverage will offer any help after molten rock wiped out most of what they owned.

The eruption has destroyed about two dozen homes in the Leilani Estates subdivision on the Big Island. On Monday, a new fissure spewing lava and toxic gas opened and a crack in the ground that emerged a day earlier sent molten rock crawling toward the ocean, officials said. Nearly 20 fissures have opened since the Kilauea volcano started erupting 12 days ago, and officials warn it may soon have a steam eruption that would shoot boulders and ash miles into the sky.  

Few insurance companies will issue policies for homes in Leilani Estates because it is in an area deemed by the U.S. Geological Survey to have a high risk of lava. But homeowners are not without options. One possibility is the Hawaii Property Insurance Association, a nonprofit collection of insurance companies created by state lawmakers in 1991 to provide basic property insurance for people who are unable to buy coverage in the private market.

The horror of seeing houses turned to ash has motivated some people who had no insurance to scramble to purchase a policy. The association announced last week that it would issue policies to uninsured homeowners in the affected area — but they will have to wait six months.

Some homeowners believe fire coverage will suffice for homes burned by fire from the lava. And a list of frequently asked questions from the Hawaii Insurance Division supports that idea, saying that lava damage may be covered “as a fire peril.”

However, there are exceptions. If policies specifically exclude lava damage, the fire coverage will not apply, said Judy Moa, an insurance broker who specializes in catastrophic coverage for Hawaii. “The cause of damage is lava at the end of the day,” she said. “If lava came down the hill, and they have lava exclusion and trees catch fire, which burn the house, that’s not covered.”

Some homeowners forgo policies that include lava coverage because they can cost more than $3,000 per year, said Moa, who has fielded many calls from anxious homeowners. The same insurance questions haunt people whose homes are standing but could still be torched by future lava flows.

Todd Corrigan and his wife left their Leilani Estates home on May 4 after a magnitude-6.9 earthquake knocked belongings off their shelves. That jolt convinced them it was time to evacuate. Corrigan said the most stressful part of the experience might be the uncertainty about what insurance will cover. His policy will pay for damage from a fire but not from lava. His insurer also cautioned him that it will not cover damage if he has not been at home for 30 days. That requirement could be a problem if he is gone for a long time.

“You have to worry about that stress when you’re trying to deal with everything else,” Corrigan said. Coverage details vary depending on policies and companies, said Insurance Division Commissioner Gordon Ito, who encouraged homeowners to contact agents to find out what is covered.

State Farm stopped writing policies for homes in the two highest-risk lava zones in the 1990s, but the company grandfathered-in any existing policies, said Kim Silva, a State Farm sales executive in Hawaii.

The company’s policies cover fire from volcanic activity, she said, “but every claim has to be handled on its own merit.” Deter’s daughters live in the same area as their 88-year-old mother. They know the eruption risks, so they made sure their mother’s home was covered by a policy that included lava.

The family’s Hawaii-based insurance agent assured daughter Vickie Pruitt that her mother’s house was fully covered for lava. But a phone call from an adjuster on the U.S. mainland told them it looked like the damage was from an earthquake — not the lava — and that the home would not be covered.

“I’m like, ‘What?'” Pruitt said. “I’m laughing hysterically. But it’s not funny. It’s tragic.” They were waiting for a follow-up call they hoped would provide more clarity.

https://www.mail.com/news/politics/8488726-lava-destroys-hawaii-homes-owners-ask-covered.html#.7518-stage-hero1-1

This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.
584

11 Responses to As lava destroys Hawaii homes, owners ask: Am I covered?

  1. Darzak says:

    “Now Deter and others who have recently lost homes to the lava-spewing mountain are on an urgent quest for answers about insurance, desperate to learn whether their coverage will offer any help after molten rock wiped out most of what they owned. ”

    The time to learn about the coverage is BEFORE the incidents occur. More evidence of the state of the average person’s intelligence.

  2. Enemy of the State says:

    I’m sure the insurance companies will find a way to weasel out of their paid and contracted obligations as usual

    • Bud Fox says:

      Having spent 12 years as a catastrophic claims adjuster, I don’t agree with your sentiment.
      At no meeting were we (field adjusters) ever told by ANY of the carriers I worked for over the years, to go out and deny claims, jip the customers out of payments, cover up anything that would cost the company money, etc. Our marching orders were ALWAYS this: Get out there and take good care of the clients as quickly as possible…get the money on the street! If it’s covered, pay it!
      The problem lies in the scenario that Darzak says above (welcome back, Buddy!!). The public either doesn’t understand how to read a contract (that there are certain exclusions or specific a-la-carte items you need to purchase separately, i.e. flood, sinkhole, earthquake, volcanic, etc.), or their agent who sold them the policy did a poor job of explaining things.
      In the end, unless these people have a specific rider that is for volcanic damage and ground subsidence, then no…they’re not covered under a regular homeowner’s policy.
      The agent should have seen the address and said, “Oh! You just bought a house next to a volcano…I strongly suggest you buy extra specific coverage.”

      • Enemy of the State says:

        That’s good , obviously you worked for a good company
        Problem is , they are not all like that
        Your experience is from that one company
        Many other people’s experiences are from many other companies that more than likely didn’t share your companies views

        • Bud Fox says:

          As an independent contractor, I worked for…hmmmm…probably 8 or 9 different insurance companies over the years! None were lying,cheating scoundrels. I’m sure they’re our there…but in my experience, 99.9% of problems are ignorant homeowners,trying to cheat the insurance companies! Lol…man, do I have some funny stories! People really are dumbasses! Lol

      • Enemy of the State says:

        “Next to a volcano”
        Ummmm that’s the entire Hawaiian Island Chain a good agent should know his area and be forthcoming with his clients

  3. Enemy of the State says:

    This is what they will hear from the insurance company

    “Act of God”

  4. flee says:

    Am I covered… ?

    Of course you are.

    You’re covered in lava.

    Like a bad neighbor…

    State farmz are there.

    To cover all your lava policies.

  5. Mark Schumacher in LV says:

    You were covered before the Lava started flowing.

  6. Mark Schumacher in LV says:

    Al Gore can’t contain himself, he’s going to fly over the volcano in his private jet and release his toilet holding tanks inside the mouth as a gift to the Hawaii volcano gods.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *