Choosing a Chief

As the nation readies to choose a leader, to choose the one “on top” of the country, forget about the choices you have been given and consider what the criteria for a leader should be. Here’s a concept to consider: Being on top means you serve others.

Many Native American tribes choose a new chief by determining who has done the most for the tribe. Who has given the most to the tribe, in time, labor, courage? Who has taken in the most orphaned children, taken care of the most widows, given his plate of food to a hungry mouth? Who has done these things without thought of compensation for doing them? This is the one who knows the right path to follow, the path on which to lead the people.

Who is our leader today? It is a man whose speeches use the word “I” more than any other past President’s speeches. “I did this…” “I did that…” He has told business builders that they are nothing special and would have nothing without the government. Aggrandizement of self is not the sign of a good leader.

Our current President stated that his wife should receive a salary for all the wonderful works she does. I guess all those taxpayer funded social trips to the luxury spots of the world for her, their children, plus her entourage of secret service agents, stylists and family members along for the ride isn’t compensation enough. And I guess it isn’t enough just to know you’ve done something positive (Has she? Is making school children eat scallions a positive act?). That statement by the President can only be translated to say, “I’m only in this for the money.”

Who do we have to choose from in this “election” (read: imaginary choice between the lesser of two evils)? One candidate has already had 4 years in office and has benefited only the bankers and a few huge corporations while more and more Americans go sleepless worrying about feeding their family tomorrow.

The other candidate has spent most of his career amassing huge sums of money by sending American jobs overseas. How does that help the people of this country? How does that make him qualified – let alone worthy – of being the leader of the American people?

Do we base our choice for a leader on promises never to be kept? Why do we even ask a candidate what laws he wants to create? A PRESIDENT DOESN’T MAKE THE LAWS! That is the job of the Congress – not simply to pass, without review, anything the President says to pass. The strength of the Constitution, the “checks and balances”, has been done away with along with most of the Bill of Rights.

Is the question “who to vote for?”, or is it “why vote?” If your only choice is between two people unworthy of the office because the main factor in choosing a candidate is how much money they have and can amass (money is the key to candidacy and election), that is antithetical to the Native American way – with predictable results.

Choosing the lesser between two evils is not the right way to choose any leader, it’s like choosing which poison you’d like to die from. So if the choice is between a known CIA asset and demonstrably the worst president ever, and a corporate stooge who’s only claim to fame is that he is really good at sending American jobs to China, then there is no choice at all.

In an election, we are only allowed to make a choice between the candidates that have been “anointed” by the powers that be. And they have already chosen the winner, and that choice was “announced” by the winner’s attendance at the table of the powers that be. Lets take a look at the last 8 Presidents:

  • Richard Nixon – TriLateral Commission Member (TLC), Council on Foreign Relations member (CFR), Bohemian Grove attendee (BG)
  • Gerald Ford – CFR, 33rd degree Free Mason (FM)
  • Jimmy Carter – TLC, CFR, Personal Valet to Rockefeller
  • Ronald Regan – 32nd degree Free Mason, BG
  •  George H.W. Bush (Bush 1) – Palladian Rite Free Mason, Skull and Bones Fraternity, CFR, TLC, BG and Bilderberger Meeting Attendee, as well as being the head of the CIA
  • William Clinton – CFR, BG, Palladian Rite Free Mason
  • George W. Bush (Bush 2 ) – CFR, BG, Palladian Rite Free Mason, Skull and Bones Fraternity
  •  Barak Obama – Known CIA asset, Prince Hall 32nd degree Free Mason.

And ALL are related to each other and the royal families of Europe.

Voting for no one when given a choice of two absolutely dreadful candidates is truly voting. Your not voting sends a message. The mainstream media rationalize that the reason why the numbers of people voting is dwindling due to apathy. Just the opposite, it is a declaration of dissatisfaction with the choices.

A little known fact about elections: unless you are a member of the “demopoops” or “repooplicans”, getting into a congressional race or even the local dog catcher race becomes an unsolvable, deterring maze and nearly impossible to accomplish. In the State of Georgia, there is a half-million dollar cash bond required to enter a state-wide race (senator, governor, etc.) if you are not acting under one of the two main parties. Then, if you do not receive 5% of the vote, your bond is forfeited. Any American can become President?????

American democracy is strikingly different from European democracy. In Germany for example, there are the communist party, social democrat party, socialist party, workers party, Christian democrat party, the green party to name a few. And all have a place on the ballot. Also in Europe, the parliamentary system allows a vote of “no confidence”. If that vote is approved, the prime minister and his cabinet step down. If our Constitution included that feature, would our Presidents be a little more motivated to do a better job?

We must stop choosing leaders by how well they have done for themselves, and begin looking for the person who will do the most for his people – not someone whose only interest is what they are going to get out of it.  Wouldn’t you prefer to vote for someone with the spirit of the Great Chiefs –  Pontiac, Seathl, Joesph? These men gave selflessly of themselves, for the greater good of their people. There’s a new paradigm coming. The old rotting edifice of the current society is soon enough going to come to an end. If we have wisdom we will remember the lessons that the great Native American chiefs left for us…to be a leader means to serve.


About the authors:  Dan and Sheila are the authors of Surviving Survivalism – How to Avoid Survivalism Culture Shock . An inside look at what to expect if you decide to pick up stakes and move to the off the grid, self-sufficient, survivalist lifestyle.

3 thoughts on “Choosing a Chief

  1. Very well written article, Sheila. I didn’t know that Obama was a 32nd Degree Mason. I thought he was just a CIA asset who got lucky and was used and implanted for the position. That’s news to me. Compared to all the other presidents, I would think Obama doesn’t even deserve or even come close to qualifying to be in the Mason society. He’s a loser who hasn’t accomplished a true thing in his entire life. There’s nothing REAL about him. At least George W. Bush (the next worst president in history) was born in the U.S. and Jimmy Carter grew peanuts on an American farm. What did Obama do? ZERO!!! NOTHING!!! NADA!!! If I were a Freemason, I’d be ashamed to have that asshole in the club. Manchurian Candidate or not, he’s trash. Period. Even his schooling was fake. Ok, I’ll stop my rant on Obama now. I’ve given that piece of trash too much attention as it is. lol

    Anyways, it is true. “A leader means to serve”. A government means “to serve” as well. For the other way around means, “Tyranny”!

    1. Just remember one thing , if you are NOT in the ” CLUB ” , you are OUT .
      Romney attended the Bilderberg meeting this year in Va. The p.o.s. in the ” black house ” did not . Take a W.A.G. on whose going to win in Nov.

  2. Ron Paul and the Tampa Convention

    August 27, 2012

    Ron Paul, one of the two main candidates for the Republican party nomination, is not being allowed to speak at his party convention in Tampa because he refused to accept the dictates of the party bosses that he submit his speech to party censors beforehand, and that he support their chosen candidate – Mitt Romney. Where have we seen such undemocratic demands made of politicians before? These demands are more typical of a totalitarian state than of a political party in a free and democratic system. On Sunday, August 26, at his “We Are The Future” rally, Dr. Paul gave the speech the totalitarian GOP party bosses did not want America to hear.

    “…to promote the cause of liberty in a revolutionary spirit.”
    – Ron Paul, August 26, 2012

    Ron Paul’s complete speech with introduction by Senator Rand Paul
    URL Link –

    The upcoming Republican convention in Tampa, August 27-30, promises to be a key event in American political history. The GOP convention in Tampa will be the scene of a battle for control of the Republican party and the White House. The struggle will be between patriotic freedom-loving supporters of Dr. Ron Paul and the Zionist-funded criminal faction that supports Mitt Romney.

    Justin Raimondo of expects the GOP to employ “The Iron Fist in Tampa” against supporters of Ron Paul:

    The extraordinary hostility of the GOP hierarchy to Ron Paul and his supporters hardly comes as a shock: Paul is, after all, the single most trenchant critic of our interventionist foreign policy since William Jennings Bryan, and he is the War Party’s deadly enemy. To the servitors of the military-industrial complex, the foreign lobbyists, and would-be Napoleons of the neocon persuasion who hold the reins of power in the GOP, he is the Devil Incarnate. So unwelcome is Paul’s presence that I doubt they’ll even allow him on the convention floor, even given that his more pliable son is one of the speakers. And you can bet Rand Paul’s speech will be vetted under a magnifying glass well in advance: these are people who hate surprises.

    For all their talk of “freedom” in the abstract, when it comes to their own party, the Republicans are ruthless authoritarians: we’re about to see that demonstrated in Tampa.

    The Romney faction is supported with millions of dollars of illegal funds, much of it coming from the Zionist extremist and international casino mogul Sheldon Adelson. The Romney faction has clearly engaged in massive criminal vote fraud during the Republican primaries in order to try and sideline Ron Paul and secure the nomination for Mitt Romney. The criminal faction behind Romney will stop at nothing in getting the nomination for their candidate and preventing Paul supporters from having their say in the convention. Tampa also happens to be the home of Central Command, the military command center for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Things are likely to get very nasty in Tampa.

    The Zionist criminal faction dominates the Republican National Committee (RNC) and is seeking to continue the “War on Terror” agenda that President George W. Bush started after 9-11. This is the agenda that brought us two disastrous wars in the Middle East and a police state mentality in America. This is the faction that is pushing us to war in Syria and Iran. Most significantly, the Zionists who control the RNC are involved in the false-flag terrorism of 9-11.

    The perpetrators of 9-11, the real terrorist masterminds behind the terror atrocity that changed America, are being protected by the secret cabal that controls the White House. The gang that is running the illegal wars and the fraudulent “War on Terror” is the same gang that carried out 9-11. The terrorists behind 9-11 have to maintain tight control of the White House and the political process to prevent a proper investigation for being carried out. It reminds me of how they killed Robert Kennedy to prevent him from becoming president and finding the killers of his brother. The 9-11 cover-up has to be maintained. 9-11 is as important in 2012 as it was in 2002. Solving 9-11 remains the single most important issue facing the American people.

    The Zionists who took over the RNC include Lewis Eisenberg, the former executive director of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. Eisenberg became finance chairman of the RNC shortly after 9-11. Eisenberg was director of the Port Authority, which owned the World Trade Center, on 9-11, and had served as the head of Governor Whitman’s (NJ) privatization board, just like Ronald Lauder did for Governor Pataki in New York. Together, these two Zionists convinced the governors of the two states to privatize the World Trade Center, an essential part of the conspiracy to destroy the Twin Towers and usher in the fraudulent “War on Terror”.

    Eisenberg was the person who was responsible for the lease of the WTC going to Larry Silverstein and his Israeli commando buddy, Frank Lowy, at the end of July 2001. The rest is history. Eisenberg is a co-chair of Romney’s Florida Finance Team.

    The following video clip explains how the RNC is breaking its own rules to try and push Dr. Paul off the scene in Tampa. Paul supporters will not be content with a film tribute to the man who is the most popular presidential candidate of our time. Anything could happen during the next five days in Tampa. Ron Paul could even win the nomination; it has happened before.

    Lewis M. Eisenberg on the history of the Port Authority, owner and operator of the World Trade Center:

    Sources and Recommended Reading:

    Bollyn, Christopher, “The Criminal Plot to Stop Ron Paul,” December 29, 2011 (updated in March 2012)

    “Lewis Eisenberg is an Angel,” YouTube, July 25, 2011

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *