Propaganda News – by David Risselada
On January 26, 2016, the FBI shot and killed rancher LaVoy Finicum in what appeared to be a deliberate setup. This brought the 25 day stand off between federal agents and militia members protesting for restored property rights, to an end. Controversy surrounds the shooting as it appears that LaVoy may have reached for something around his waistband after appearing to take a bullet; however, there is no sound in the video released by the FBI so no definate conclusions can be made. LaVoy Finicum, along with other militia members are portrayed as terrorists by the main stream media and were treated accordingly by federal law enforcement officers.
Since the beginning of the Obama administration there has been an all out effort to label anyone of a right leaning ideology as a potential extremist. In the report published in 2009 entitled “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment,” references are made to economic hardships, proposed weapon bans and the election of the first African American president as things that may ecourage rightwing violence. The report also expresses concern that radical right wing groups may attempt to recruit returning war veterans who may be disgruntled with the government. The following paragraphs are from this report.
Rightwing extremists have capitalized on the election of the first African American president, and are focusing their efforts to recruit new members, mobilize existing supporters, and broaden their scope and appeal through propaganda, but they have not yet turned to attack planning.
The current economic and political climate has some similarities to the 1990s when rightwing extremism experienced a resurgence fueled largely by an economic recession, criticism about the outsourcing of jobs, and the perceived threat to U.S. power and sovereignty by other foreign powers.
During the 1990s, these issues contributed to the growth in the number of domestic rightwing terrorist and extremist groups and an increase in violent acts targeting government facilities, law enforcement officers, banks, and infrastructure sectors.
The possible passage of new restrictions on firearms and the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks.
Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.
Proposed imposition of firearms restrictions and weapons bans likely would attract new members into the ranks of rightwing extremist groups, as well as potentially spur some of them to begin planning and training for violence against the government. The high volume of purchases and stockpiling of weapons and ammunition by rightwing extremists in anticipation of restrictions and bans in some parts of the country continue to be a primary concern to law enforcement.
Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to rightwing extremists. DHS is concerned that rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to boost their violent capabilities.
Reading this report one is left with the impression that the government is deliberately planning to label people as terrorists because they know there is going to be a great deal of resistance to their agenda. This is an agenda that has transformed our nation from freedom and prosperity to socialism and desperation, and labeling dissenters as terrorists is a convinient way to ensure no one stands in the way; and if they do, law enforcement has been trained to deal with them. For instance, in 2013 the FBI had begun target practice on targets depicting everyday American citizens brandishing firearms, this included pregnant women and children. The name of the program was “No More Hesitation” and was designed to condition law enforcement personal to shoot first and ask questions later. Comparing the targets with the quotes from the DHS report gives the impression that there will at some point be door to door gun confiscation. Another point to consider is the fact that the FBI, and other law enforcement agencies, have removed all references of Islamic extremism from their training manuals, filling the void with information similar to the DHS report. This means that all new FBI recruits are being indoctrinated into the belief that conservatives and Constitutionalists are threats to national security. This explains why law enforcement officers are so quick to pull the trigger.
The FBI has a long history of infiltrating and discrediting organizations considered to be a threat to government power. It is a program called COINTELPRO (Counter Intelligence Program) and it dates back to the 1950’s. The program was used to infiltrate groups like the Communist Party U.S.A., Black Panthers, the Klu Klux Klan and other organizations percieved to be a threat. Under the standing law of the time, “The Communist Control Act of 1954,” FBI director J. Edgar Hoover used the program to spy on communists. The idea was to infiltrate targeted groups with the purpose of discrediting them and causing internal strife in order to weaken their political influence. In the 1990’s the U.S. government turned its focus to patriot groups, gun owners and others who professed to be “Constitutionalists.” This was due to the fact that the government feared an angry populace after outsourcing jobs and surrendering U.S. sovereignty to international interests. In 1996, at the height of the militia movement motivated by the government’s excessive use of force at Waco andRuby Ridge, the FBI unlawfully infiltrated the Georgia Militia and planted explosives devises on their property. Robert Edward Star and William James McCranie were charged with manufacturing, with the intent to distribute, “shrapnel packed” pipe bombs. This was later proven to be a deliberate set up as explained in the radio broadcast of William Coopers “The Hour of the Time” below. The idea was to portray the Constitutional Militia as a group of radicals seeking to overthrow the government.
In the Oregon standoff, COINTELPRO was in play as FBI agents infiltrated the militia group and deliberately harrassed members of the community. They even went as far as snooping around the local armory to give the impression they intended to break in. This would have turned public opinion against militia members while encouraging citizens to demand government intervention. This resulted in the resignation of Harney County Fire Marshall Chris Briels. Briels personally caught the agents snooping around the armory and was told to back off after bringing it to the attention of Judge Steve Grasty.
The U.S. government also has a habit of creating its own crisis in order to justify military action. Operation Northwoods for example, was a scenario where the Joint Chiefs of staff drew up a plan to stage fake terrorist attacks on the American public while blaming Cuba; thus, justifying a much desired attack against the Island nation. This is known as the false flagattack, and history shows that this has been used on more than one occasion to justify America’s involvement in war. The Gulf of Tonkin and the Attack of Pearl Harbor were both said to be false flag attacks. What many in the militia movement fear is that there will be a deliberate attack set up by COINTELPRO agents in order to justify police/military action against those who stand for freedom, which would justify the need for furthering the police state. Is it possible that LaVoy Finicum was deliberately led to the road block with the hopes that he would attempt to fire on FBI agents; thus, justifying the further encroachment of our constitutional rights? Given the information presneted in this article it is a possibilty that should not be discounted.
It is the patriot movement that stands in the way of the Obama agenda. Slowly but surely we are watching the narrative of terrorism move from the threat of Islamic Radicalism to “right wing” radicalism. Fear and misinformation are being used to give the impression that the nation is filled with anti-governemnt extremists who are wanting to go war with the federal government. At the same time, any education concerning the principles behind the constitution has been scrubbed away from the public school system, just the same as the brutal history of excessive government control has. The government must be held to account for their subversive tactics and their deliberate attempt to discredit a movement that is only standing for the rights guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution before history repeats itself.
The Obama administration knew there was going to be pushback against his agenda which is why they immediately began labeling patriots as extremists in order to discredit and silence them.
4 thoughts on “COINTELPRO, False Flags and a Patriot Down”
“Fear and misinformation are being used to give the impression that the nation is filled with anti-governemnt extremists who are wanting to go war with the federal government.”
Thanks to t.v., the really stupid sheeple will buy it hook, line & sinker.
They’re as much the enemy as the so-called ‘government’ itself.
The word “movement” should be replaced with the word “mission”.
The patriot movement sounds as if it is a temporary event. Like a trip to the toilet.
The patriot mission sound like something that will continue until all the goals have been achieved..
… “and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely.”
That is propaganda and lies. Our federal government is a combination of “We the people of the United States as the first branch from which ALL delegated authority to both the state and general (federal) comes from.
To show that this is true one must understand that without the Declaration of Independence from which the PEOPLE of that time declared and fought for their freedom from the British crown. It was not the “states” nor the “general” non existent government that did so. The general (erroneously called federal) government did not even exist until the states through the REPRESENTATIVES of the people created the US Constitution which defined our new government, also assigning to the branches and specific named positions within it the powers delegated by the people.
Not one person who served/serves within our government then or now was given that delegated authority, instead they were/are allowed to use the delegated authority of the branch or position as long as they keep to the contract (US Constitution) that they are under and KEEP the lawfully required Oath.
As the declaration of Independence and the US Constitution requires “We the people of the united States are to replace any corrupt or treasonous people who serves, and that includes every single position – elected, hired, contracted, etc.
The states have lawful authority over their own domain, and they created the general government. The states are the second branch of the American government. Their authority is delegated through both the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution.
The third and most limited branch within the USA is the general government. Those that serve within the general government are only allowed to do what is put into writing within the US Constitution, beyond that they have NO LAWFUL authority. Those that serve within the general government have very limited jurisdiction within the states, and within the USA proper. It is put into writing, and it IS the Supreme law of our nation that they are required to follow. The reason for that can be seen today with the corruptness of those that serve within our governments.
Basically when those that serve within the general government do not KEEP the Oath and do not do the duties as assigned then they no longer represent the people and have NO LAWFUL authority here within the USA. The US Constitution then REQUIRES that we not only replace those people, but that we prosecute them for the crimes they have committed up to and including treason against the American people.
Thomas Jefferson: “The several States composing, the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for special purposes — delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force: that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral part, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party: that the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party (the people) has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress.”
St John Tucker: “The congress of the United States possesses no power to regulate, or interfere with the domestic concerns, or police of any state: it belongs not to them to establish any rules respecting the rights of property; nor will the constitution permit any prohibition of arms to the people;…”
St. George Tucker: “The Federal Government is the creature of the States. It is not a party to the Constitution, but the result of it – the creation of that agreement which was made by the States as parties. It is a mere agent, entrusted with limited powers for certain objects; which powers and objects are enumerated in the Constitution. Shall the agent be permitted to judge of the extent of his own powers, without reference to his constituent?”
George Washington in his Farewell Address: “It is important, likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free Country should inspire caution in those entrusted with its administration, to confine themselves within their respective Constitutional spheres; avoiding in the exercise of the Powers of one department to encroach upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create whatever the form of government, a real despotism. The necessity of reciprocal checks in the exercise of political power; by dividing and distributing it into different depositories, and constituting each the Guardian of the Public Weal against invasions by the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient and modern; some of them in our country and under our own eyes. To preserve them must be as necessary as to institute them.”
Basically the delegated authority is in writing, it is a contract, and it is also the supreme LAW of our nation. Those that serve within the general government have gone way beyond what was delegated to them and no longer meet the requirements of the position they occupy within our government. Many in the three branches have committed Treason against the American people.
Between MIAC and the SPLC, do we really need CNN, CBSABCNBC, and FOX? And while fewer and fewer folks believe this crap, it seems fewer and fewer folks are courageous enough to do anything about it!