Ground Beneath Fukushima Sinking, Nuke Water Has 3 Times More Cesium Than Chernobyl’s Total Release

Before It’s News – by Mort Amsel

It is an emergency – has been since 11 March 2011 and will continue to be long into the future,” said Shaun Burnie, an independent nuclear consultant.

He says onsite contaminated water contains three times the caesium released from the 1986 Chernobyl accident – the world’s worst nuclear disaster.  “That underscores the scale of this never-ending threat.”      

To Make matters worse…    The Fukushima plant sits smack in the middle of an underground aquifer. Deep beneath the ground, the site is rapidly being overwhelmed by water.

What happens when you pour hundreds of thousands of tons of water (400 metric tons each day times 2.5 years times 365 days in a year equals 365,000 metric tons of water) onto soil which sits above a massive aquifer?

The spent fuel pool at Fukushima Unit 4 is the top short-term threat to humanity, and is a national security issue for America.

Literally everybody should be keeping track of this, why TEPCO seems to be the only ones handling it is beyond me.  This is a national security threat to humanity, to earth and every living thing on it.  Its a holocaust in the making.  Slow, painful and deadly.  TEPCO is overwhelmed and have proven their inability to contain this situation.  Ever read Stephen King’s “Under the Dome”?  That is what they should do to Fukushima.  Encapsulate it, seal it off and get rid of it, ship the whole thing out to space or something (which is impossible i know).

END THE NUCLEAR AGE  -Mort

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/08/ground-beneath-fukushima-sinking-nuke-water-has-3-times-more-cesium-than-chernobyls-total-release-2732136.html

7 thoughts on “Ground Beneath Fukushima Sinking, Nuke Water Has 3 Times More Cesium Than Chernobyl’s Total Release

  1. On ABC News last nite they stated there was no risk to the seafood
    which of course they are imbeciles to think anyone with a brain
    believes them. Next, the safe levels of radiation will be raised, again.
    I wonder how the dolphins, seals, etc. are doing. If any independent
    scientists do their own investigation, their samples are stolen or they
    are suicided. Maybe the UN would like to claim Fukushima as one
    of their National Parks. Disgusting.

  2. I’m glad there are more postings on Fukushima lately. I was getting worried that people were forgetting or ignoring the significant effects of this disaster. To me, this problem is very important and should not be put off to the side because it will only get worse, the longer we ignore fixing it. And since, no one in the world is acknowledging it or fixing it, (not even TEPCO), it leads me to believe that it will only get worse.

    I agree this is a major national security issue not to just our country or Japan’s, but to humanity and the whole planet as well. I also don’t know why the hell the politicians are choosing to ignore it. As if TPP, the economic crisis, war in the Middle East and the NWO is going to save them from radiation and contamination in the end. There won’t be any water left on Earth to survive if they don’t fix it. The currents will expand into the Atlantic and so on if they flow through just right. It’s insane.

    Keep posting the info. Paul. I like to keep updated on it. Thanks.

  3. Having the United Nations completely ignore a catastrophy like Fukushima shows the world what a complete sham UN resolutions are.

  4. “Literally everybody should be keeping track of this, why TEPCO seems to be the only ones handling it is beyond me.”

    Uh, because it’s INTENTIONAL maybe?

    1. Actually, it’s because this problem defies solutions at all levels.
      No corporation can solve this.
      No government can solve this.
      No military can solve this.
      It would take an alien intervention with alien technology to correct this nightmare.

      1. btw, it was easily containable, had they chosen to do so. Concreted over, like Chernoble.

        The sad truth is, this situation was created intentionally.

        Depopulation.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*