HHS to Issa: We Won’t Comply With Your Subpeona Because We Don’t Trust You

Town Hall – by Guy Benson

The latest middle finger from an increasingly lawless and desperate administration. I’m not a lawyer, but I’m fairly confident that “we don’t think much of you” is an acceptable reason to ignore a Congressional subpoena:

 The Health and Human Services Department told House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa that it won’t turn over documents related to the security of the Healthcare.gov website because it can’t trust him to keep secret information that could give hackers a roadmap to wreak havoc on the system.  Issa has issued a subpoena to MITRE, a government contractor, to turn over unredacted copies of security-testing documents by noon Friday. At issue are website development plans MITRE drafted for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which is under HHS. Already, Issa has been given access to the documents he seeks “in camera” — meaning committee staff were able to review them in a room but not keep them — but he is seeking physical copies…Administration officials worry that Issa intends to put them in the public domain, which Esquea argues could compromise the security of the site…While agency letters to Capitol Hill tend to be very deferential, Esquea’s did little to veil the administration’s feelings about Issa’s trustworthiness.

The website is secure, they insist, but they won’t corroborate that claim with evidence because Darrell Issa might leak the truth to the public — a public, incidentally, that is being urged by the government to enter their sensitive personal data into online state andfederal systems that have been breached more than once. They warn that potential Issa leaks would jeopardize Healthcare.gov’s security, which is currently in strong shape. Just trust them — and ignore admonitions from IT security experts. What these Obamacare officials fail to understand is that for many Americans, it’s their trustworthiness that’s in question, not Issa’s. Meanwhile, Yuval Levin agrees with my conclusionthat the administration’s flurry of eleventh-hour delays, changes, and “suggestions” to insurance companies are strong indicators that the White House is petrified of what’s coming next month:

 To “strongly encourage” insurers to take these kinds of steps (to use the Orwellian phrase of the HHS announcement), and to do it just a couple of weeks before the new system is supposed to start, suggests that the administration’s health experts mapped out how January is shaping up and had a collective heart attack. They seem especially worried about people forced out of old coverage and into new encountering horrible surprises and about the extremely low payment rate so far among people who have chosen new insurance plans on the exchanges. About two weeks before the deadline (after which, if they have not paid their first premium, people’s coverage will be voided) it looks like only about a fifth of the people who have signed up for exchange coverage have paid their first premium. If far more don’t do so soon, the (already very low) enrollment numbers the administration is looking at will fall far, far lower…The steps announced yesterday aren’t directed at that forthcoming problem, but, as usual, at far more immediate concerns. My guess, and it is just that, is that the administration has taken these steps because their internal projections at this point suggest some kind of disastrous replay of the politics of October and November in January, and this time they are intent on getting people to blame the insurers instead of the administration. I think that’s very unlikely to work, but it’s not hard to see why they would be desperate to try.

Yes, good luck with that. The Washington Posruns through the slap-dash nature of these new delays and highlights a backlog problem that is gumming up the works:

 Health officials have not decided, however, exactly how people would be able to request such extra time, whether they need to ask before the Dec. 23 deadline, and the precise circumstances under which HHS would grant an extension

Those seem like rather important details, no? We’re ten days away from that deadline. Back to the Post:

 [A CMS official] and the other individual familiar with the system said that some of the 50,000 to 60,000 applications have not been completed because consumers did not provide all the required information, and workers from the outside company, Serco, have been unable to reach them by phone to fill in the blanks. In other instances, paper applications were placed on hold until last week because parts of the online system needed to answer eligibility questions were not working well enough…Besides the applications in the backlog, about 100,000 paper applications have been processed, but those consumers were not told of the results until recently. The applications are supposed to be mailed notification letters, but none were mailed out until recently and the vast majority still have not.As a result, officials said, Serco workers last week tried calling the roughly 100,000 people to inform them of the eligibility decision and urge them to go online to sign up. It is not clear how many they were able to reach.

So thousands of people who submitted paper applications aren’t enrolled in coverage because their forms were somehow flawed or incomplete. Some unknown percentage of this group aren’t aware of this fact. As for those who correctly filled out their applications, the “vast majority” of them still haven’t received a letter from Obamacare notifying them of their subsidy eligibility status. That’s because the “vast majority” of those letters still haven’t been mailed. I repeat: The deadline is in ten days. As for HHS’ assertion that “many insurers do retroactive coverage in the current market,” health insurance expert Bob Laszewski responds, “I don’t know that the hell they’re talking about.” Laszewski also says he thinks fewer Americans will have insurance on January 1 than did prior to the law’s enactment. Think about that. Feeling better yet, America? I’ll leave you with three quick hits: (1) An essay on why Obamacare will, in fact,exacerbate America’s doctor shortage, (2) a new Reason-Rupe poll showing that by a 21-point margin, Americans would prefer to return to the country’s pre-Obamacare health system, and (3) my appearance on Fox News this afternoon. Topic? President Obama’s big prize:


4 thoughts on “HHS to Issa: We Won’t Comply With Your Subpeona Because We Don’t Trust You

  1. I just don’t understand why Issa and the house committee don’t have the power to stop this criminal activity and arrest Sibelius. But Issa could call for impeachment of Soetoro and he doesn’t do that either.

    1. I think these little “conflicts” are publicized to convince Americans that there are opposing forces in our government, which allows them to believe that someone in Washington will be fighting for them.

      And although there may be some genuine opposition within our government, all they’re fighting for is the ability to grab more from the cookie jar than their opponent, but NO ONE in D.C. represents the American people, or is working to enact the will of the people.

      When Obama’s loss of credibility prevents him from forwarding the N.W.O. agenda they’ll impeach him, and that action will only be a six-month media circus that distracts Americans from real issues, and helps to convince them that we have a working justice system.

      After the impeachment Biden will say “I’ve pardoned Obama because it’s better that we heal as a nation and move on” (rather then punish the criminal who’s pretending to be our president).

      Impeachment is BS, and EVERYONE in D.C. has got to go. I hardly even follow their antics anymore because it’s all meaningless, staged propaganda, and it never changes.

      Everyone’s waiting for real justice. What happens in D.C. is nothing more than a charade as far as we’re concerned.

  2. Maybe Sibelius does not want to end up dead in a plane crash and has the goods on Issa and Barry. If anything happens to her the cat gets let out of the bag.

  3. “it won’t turn over documents related to the security of the Healthcare.gov website because it can’t trust him to keep secret information that could give hackers a roadmap to wreak havoc on the system.”

    BAHAHAHA!! WHhatt?? OMG! We won’t comply because we don’t trust you? WTF??!!!! The BALLS on these people!

    Can I use that same response for Obamacare? or for a police checkpoint?

    HELLL NOO!!! I’d get taken away in handcuffs never to see the light of day, but this BITCH says it and NOT ONE FRIGGIN person in that room takes her away in handcuffs. ARE YOU F**KING KIDDING ME!!!!!!???



    When are WE THE PEOPLE gonna arrest these bastards?!! I’m so SICK OF THIS SHIT!

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *