Private Attorney General discloses DOJ and DHS corruption to Sheriff Joe Arpaio

Paul Andrew Mitchell  Greetings Sheriff Arpaio, Deputy Sheriffs and All Staff:

Please allow us to itemize for your official consideration
a small sampling of reasons why the U.S. Department of Justice
and Department of Homeland Security are corrupt and
motivated to retaliate corruptly against your office:

(1)  our ongoing investigation of missing credentials required of
all Federal government officers has confirmed that counterfeit
OPM Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS are
circulating widely among recently hired Federal “employees”;
see 5 U.S.C. sections 2903, 2906 and 3331:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/3331.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/2906.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/2903.html

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm#DAZ

(2)  that “bootleg” form is a counterfeit because it lacks the OMB control number
that is absolutely required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (“PRA”);
it also lacks the paragraph at the bottom which cites 5 U.S.C. 2903 supra
defining the persons who are authorized to administer Standard Form 61 (“SF-61”);
in such cases, the Public Protection Clause of that PRA is rather explicit:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/44/3512.html  (b)

(b) The protection provided by this section may be raised in the form of a

complete defense, bar, or otherwise at any time

during the agency administrative process or judicial action applicable thereto.
(3)  in line with our ongoing investigation described above,
you are hereby formally notified that the SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS
for Eric H. Holder, Jr. are also fatally defective, for the same reasons:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/affidavit.refused.JPG
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/affidavit.GIF

Here are our original Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) Requests for Holder’s SF-61:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/foia.request.holder.opm.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/foia.request.holder.htm

In addition to the counterfeit credential above, the related correspondence we received
is archived here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-04-28/page01.GIF
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-04-28/page02.GIF

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/page01.GIF

Accordingly, the existence of valid credentials for Eric H. Holder, Jr.
assumes facts not in evidence and, therefore, he is not and cannot be
a duly authorized Attorney General of the United States, nor can he
as such delegate any authority to any subordinates within DOJ.

(Frankly, I have more authority than he does at present.

See 18 U.S.C. 1964;  Rotella v. Wood.)

(4)  Janet Napolitano has already been charged with multiple Federal offenses
in connection with a Federal Grand Jury “subpoena” which the late
U.S. District Judge John M. Roll authorized my office to litigate
in defense of the Arizona trust which had been served with same:

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/predicate.acts.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/roll/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/roll/nadappea.htm#napolitano1512
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/roll/nadappea.htm#napolitano1510

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/azvmitch/crossco4.htm

[begin excerpt]

Ms. Janet Napolitano with:

(1)  aiding  and   abetting  the  obstruction  of  correspondence

transmitted  via  first  class,  certified,  and  registered

United States  mail, under  color of law, in violation of 18

U.S.C. 2 and 1702 (twenty-five (25) counts);

(2)  aiding and  abetting the  act of  tampering with  a  federal

grand jury,  in violation  of 18  U.S.C. 2 and 1512 (twenty-

five (25) counts);

(3)  aiding and  abetting obstruction of criminal investigations,

in violation  of 18  U.S.C. 2  and  1510  (twenty-five  (25)

counts);

(4)  deprivation  of  fundamental  Rights  under  color  of  law,

specifically the  Right  to  Petition  a  lawfully  convened

federal grand  jury for a formal investigation, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. 242 (twenty-five (25) counts);

(5)  conspiracy to  commit all  of the  above, in violation of 18

U.S.C. 241 and 371 (twenty-five (25) counts);

(6)  impersonating an  officer of the United States, in violation

of 5 U.S.C. 3331 and 18 U.S.C. 912 (one (1) count each).

[end excerpt]

We also have reasons strongly to suspect that Ms. Napolitano was also complicit
for failing to do anything but obstruct and stonewall our part-time investigation into the
whereabouts of 2,500 missing children — and young adults — who had reportedly
“disappeared” into Arizona’s Child Protective Services:

http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/kidnaps.htm
(cf. 42 U.S.C. 1986:  action for neglect to prevent and/or failure to remedy)

(5)  lastly, and arguably of equal or greater severity, for many years DOJ
has been commencing ALL civil and criminal lawsuits in the U.S. District Courts
on behalf of one or the other of 2 defunct Delaware corporations named
“UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” [sic];  when we brought this fact to the
attention of the Delaware Secretary of State, both corporate charters
were promptly REVOKED!

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/registered.agent.2007-02-12.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.corp/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.corp/registered.agent.2007-02-12.gif

We recommend that you make official contact with the Arizona Secretary of State
to confirm that neither defunct corporation has ever registered to do business
inside the State of Arizona, as we have already confirmed with the
Secretaries of State for California and several other large States of the Union:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/  (e.g. New York State = the heart of “The Conspiracy”)

We elaborate the all important differences between the “United States”
and the “United States of America” here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm
(read “NOT a corporation”:  U.S. v. Cooper Corp.)

If we can be of any further assistance to your offices in this matter,
please direct one of your capable Staff to initiate contact with me here, via email,
and we can take it from there.

We are standing by, Sheriff Arpaio.
Paul Andrew Mitchell

Bcc:  Arizona Attorney General, Crime, Fraud and Victim Resource Center

9 thoughts on “Private Attorney General discloses DOJ and DHS corruption to Sheriff Joe Arpaio”

  1. Where does impeachment fit into the president’s attempt to shield his and his administration’s treasonous and RICO acts with executive privelage. The current administration sought to compromise our nations 2nd amendment rights; they sought to continue the poisoning of generations of our nations’ citizens with street drugs; and they sought to rape the economic vitality of our great nation by enslaving us by the cartels that traffic in little girls and little boys for sex. IMPEACH FOR ANY AND ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:
    Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution says, “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
    “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” are (1) real criminality — breaking a law; (2) abuses of power; (3) “violation of public trust” as defined by Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers. In 1970, then Representative Gerald R. Ford defined impeachable offenses as “whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.” An excellent definition, Mr. Former President. In the past, Congress has issued Articles of Impeachment for acts in three general categories:
    Exceeding the constitutional bounds of the powers of the office.
    Behavior grossly incompatible with the proper function and purpose of the office.
    Employing the power of the office for an improper purpose or for personal gain.
    IMPEACH OBAMA AND HIS CABINET NOW……………………………..
    WHERE IS THE HAGUE-WORLD COURT AND THE U.N.? Did Obama and agents of Obama’s administration sell and transport military grade weapons to another country resulting in the deaths of over 300 innocent people, including a federal border patrol agent?
    IMPEACH OBAMA AND HIS CABINET NOW……………………………..

    Reply

    1. Obama had nothing 4 years ago. Now he is worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The man belongs chained to a rock pile.

      Reply

  2. whatever comes down stand firm and hold to the second amendment. if thats gone all is lost for generations , probably never to be recovered…

    Reply

  3. It’s highly possible that the weapons sold by the Obama administration in the Fast & Furious scandal are not even a tenth of 1% of the weaponry they have sold or given to other enemy states and entities of America. There is zero reason to trust Barack Obama, nor his appointed government, nor those who are keeping silent concerning his high crimes and misdemeanors. Do you really think that a government that will be selling weapons like they have to Mexican drug cartels and fighting hard to make sure America’s laws are not upheld, borders are not secured, votes are not lawful, people are not allowed their constitutional freedoms including the right to a trial by jury, and more, are of the people, by the people and for the people of the United States of America? I believe we have a military in grave danger, as well as our country. Do we know where Obama has all of our troops? Has he been dividing them and training, preparing and arming our enemies and giving them weaponry and information to allow them to destroy our troops, as the political demons fo Rwanda did to half of their own nation? Will Obama be giving Russia our missile defense launch codes, as they’ve leaked a lot of sensitive information already? What promises and deals has he been making behind closed doors and off camera? The US Constitution declares any President or VP must be a Natural Born Citizen (not merely an ordinary US Citizen, like all Senators, Governors, and other government officials need to be), and the Natural Born Citizen is different than the Citizen in the Constitution, so this MUST be addressed, and proof of Obama either being a Natural Born Citizen or not a Natural Born Citizen must become something to be proven immediately in the US Supreme Court of Law, openly before the American people, on camera. Americans have the duty and obligation per the Constitution to demand its government is upholding the laws of the land, and this government is not doing that. We cannot trust them and need to remove them now and do a full investigation into Congress as well as this administration. It’s possible that Obama, Holder and the rest of them could stand trial and be proven innocent, but not likely. Let’s put them in court and plan for the worst, and restore safety, peace, prosperity and order to America.

    Reply

  8. Forward this to Issa. Remove Holder since he is NOT a duly authorized Attorney General of the United States!

    Reply

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*