Sacramento police unveil body cam policy after protests

Mail.com

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — Sacramento police have issued their first written policy on when officers can turn off body cameras after two officers muted their microphones following the fatal shooting of an unarmed black man in his grandparents’ backyard, and promised Tuesday to release more video footage in a week.

The department made the unusual decision to release video of Stephon Clark’s shooting within three days after he was killed, including body camera footage from the two officers who shot the 22-year-old while responding to reports of someone breaking car windows, and from a sheriff’s department helicopter circling overhead. 

A spokesman, Sgt. Vance Chandler, said the department has a 30-day deadline from the March 18 shooting to release remaining video and audio recordings, including those from other responding officers and police squad cars. He spoke outside a special City Council meeting focused on department policies and practices after weeks of protests roiled California’s capital city, disrupted professional basketball games and blocked rush hour traffic.

Body camera footage of Clark’s killing reveals that the two officers who shot him were told to mute their microphones several minutes after the shooting. The new policy requires officers to verbalize their reason for turning off the microphone.

Body camera use is covered in training but officers haven’t received any written direction on when the equipment can be turned off until now, Chandler said. Officers were previously told they could mute their cameras for personal conversations, including those that involve a supervisor, tactical discussions or times when a citizen requests that the camera be turned off, such as during a victim’s statement.

The policy was in the works before Clark’s shooting but his death prompted the department to issue the guidance more quickly, Chandler said. He said the department is still investigating who told the officers to turn off the microphones; whether that person is a supervisor; and whether the decision was appropriate.

The department is adopting a widely used policy that should already have been in place, said Geoffrey Alpert, a professor of criminology at the University of South Carolina and an expert on police use of force.

“At least at this point they’ve got the proper rules in there now,” he said. “It shouldn’t happen again, but it shouldn’t have happened in the first place.” The new policy says “employees shall not deactivate or mute their (cameras) until the investigative or enforcement activity involving a member of the public has concluded.”

Officers can turn off their cameras while dealing with a victim of sexual assault or if a supervisor instructs them to do so. They can also turn off the equipment if a victim or witness is refusing to provide a statement on camera and the situation is non-confrontational, or when speaking to a doctor, nurse or paramedic.

Sacramento City Councilman Allen Warren said it should be updated to include specific penalties for violating the policy. Police Chief Daniel Hahn told City Council members that the department is also working with outside experts to give officers training and experience in avoiding implicit racial bias, including having new officers tour and do public works projects in predominantly minority neighborhoods.

The department said the two officers have been with Sacramento police for two and four years, but each has four years’ previous experience with other law enforcement agencies. Both are on paid administrative leave.

“This is a very complex issue and it will take complex solutions. Our community is crying out for change,” said Hahn, who became the city’s first black police chief last year. Mayor Darrell Steinberg said the council wants answers from Hahn in coming weeks on improvements to its policies and practices. He told Hahn that reconsidering the department’s foot pursuit policy to minimize the use of lethal force should be “a top tier priority” for consideration.

“I think it gets at the essence of what we saw on that videotape and the essence of what we’re struggling with as a community here together,” Steinberg said. Stevante Clark, Stephon’s brother, shook Steinberg’s hand weeks after cursing him at a much more unruly meeting. Stevante Clark began his brief remarks by leading the crowd in chanting his brother’s name, then asked to meet privately with Hahn and Steinberg. He urged the media not to further air video of the shooting because it is distressing the family.

“My heart is gone,” he said, repeatedly tapping his head. “Emotions, feelings….” Two other members of the audience were escorted from the council chamber by police without incident after repeatedly interrupting other speakers or using profanity. Many of the roughly 60 activists and community members set to speak called for the two police officers to be fired and criminal charged, though experts cite court decisions that have held officers may use lethal force if they reasonably fear for their safety.

https://www.mail.com/news/politics/8407874-sacramento-police-unveil-body-cam-policy-protests.html#.7518-stage-hero1-9

2 thoughts on “Sacramento police unveil body cam policy after protests

  1. There is NEVER a legitimate reason for cops to shut off their body cameras, and they shouldn’t have the ability to do so.

    “…mute their cameras for personal conversations, including those that involve a supervisor, tactical discussions or times when a citizen requests that the camera be turned off, such as during a victim’s statement…..”

    “…They can also turn off the equipment if a victim or witness is refusing to provide a statement on camera and the situation is non-confrontational, or when speaking to a doctor, nurse or paramedic….”

    These are cheap excuses for having an on-off switch on the device, and keeping the camera rolling through these events doesn’t violate anyone rights, or prevent the cop from doing his job. What we do find is that the camera always seems to be shut off when the cop is murdering someone, or committing some other heinous crime.

  2. here’s a new ruling for you

    No OFF switch , device is on the second you start your shift , and is off when you hand the device back in at the end of your shift , and all the recordings are sent to a data base , not in the device itself ..any tampering with the device is a 1 year in jail , any tampering with the device in order to hide your actions on a call or dealing with a suspect ..immediate firing ,Felony criminal charges , any law suit payout due to your actions are the pigs personal responsibility

    they need to learn what we already know about cops, they cant be trusted ..they only have their own actions to blame

    PUT SOME FCKEN TEETH IN THIS PIG GAME

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*