What about every member of the jury, military and police who are all US CITIZENS or US PERSONS effectively described as “Federal Personnel” and therefore “Enemy Aliens” of the State?
Trading with the Enemy Act,
Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 106, § 1, 40 Stat. 411 § 3 (Acts prohibited) (It shall be unlawful– (a) For any person in the United States, except with the license of the President, granted to such person, or to the enemy, or ally of enemy, as provided in this Act [sections 1 to 6, 7 to 39, and 41 to 44 of this Appendix] to trade, or attempt to trade, either directly or indirectly, with, to, or from, or for, or on account of, or on behalf of, or for the benefit of, any other person, with knowledge or reasonable cause to believe that such other person is an enemy or ally of enemy, or is conducting or taking part in such trade, directly or indirectly, for, or on account of, or on behalf of, or for the benefit of, an enemy or ally of enemy.); http://www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/title50a/50a_2_1_.html … http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode12/usc_sec_12_00000095—-000-.html … http://www.treas.gov/offices/enforcement/ofac/legal/statutes/twea.pdf
“Citizens” and “residents” of the United States are, by Executive Proclamations 2039 and 2040 [March 6 and 9, 1933 respectively], declared to be “enemy aliens of the United States,” according to 12 USCA Section 95b, and under the Trading with the Enemy Act of October 6, 1917; 12 U.S.C. 95a.; 50 U.S.C. ___;http://www.treas.gov/offices/enforcement/ofac/legal/statutes/twea.pdf
Federal personnel.
Cf. Article of commerce;United States person. U.S. Person. US Person.5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(13) the term “Federal personnel” means officers and employees of the Government of the United States, members of the uniformed services (including members of the Reserve Components), individuals entitled to receive immediate or deferred retirement benefits under any retirement program of the Government of the United States(including survivor benefits). http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/552
26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(30)
United States person: The term “United States person” means—(A) a citizen or resident of the United States, (B) a domestic partnership, (C) a domestic corporation, (D) any estate (other than a foreign estate, within the meaning of paragraph (31)), and (E) any trust if— (i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust, and (ii) one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust. http://assembler.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00007701—-000-.html
31 CFR 545.315 (United States person; U.S. person) (The term United States person or U.S. person means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.);http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/04may20041600/edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2003/julqtr/31cfr545.315.htm
N.B. Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co., 59 U.S. (18 How.) 272, 278-279, 15 L.Ed. 372 (1856) aff’d. Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 240 U.S. 1, 5, 8, 60 L.Ed. 493 (1916); Northern Pipeline Const. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50, 67 (1982) (It is certain that this diversity in ‘the law of the land’ between public defaulters and ordinary debtors was understood in this country, and entered into the legislation of the colonies and provinces, and more especially of the States, after the declaration of independence and before the formation of the constitution of the United States. Not only was the process of distress in nearly or quite universal use for the collection of taxes, but what was generally termed awarrant of distress, running against the body, goods, and chattels of defaulting receivers of public money, was issued to some public officer, to whom was committed [59 U.S. 272, 279] the power to ascertain the amount of the default, and by such warrant proceed to collect it.); http://laws.findlaw.com/us/59/272.html
Enemy of the State.
“The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the TRUTH becomes the greatest ENEMY OF THE STATE.” — Dr. Joseph M. Goebbels
SED VIDE:
U.S. National.
U.S. v. Karaouni, No. 03-10327 (9th Cir. 08/24/2004) (This syntactic distinction is critical because the legal definitions of U.S. national and U.S. citizen are not synonymous. All citizens of the United States are nationals, but some nationals, such as persons born in American Samoa and other U.S. territorial possessions, are not citizens. 8 U.S.C. § 1408; Perdomo-Padilla v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 964, 967-69 (9th Cir. 2003). Indeed, the term “national of the United States” is defined as including “a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(22). Thus, a claim to be a U.S. national is not a claim to be a citizen, but a claim to be a member of a broader group that includes citizens as well as others. As a legal concept, the term U.S. national came into use in the aftermath of the Spanish-American War to clarify the status of persons born in the territories that the United States acquired from Spain. Hampton v. Mow Sun Wong, 426 U.S. 88, 91, 107-13 (1976); Rabang v. INS, 35 F.3d 1449, 1452 (9th Cir. 1994); Cabebe v. Acheson, 183 F.2d 795, 797-801 (9th Cir. 1950). We recently have given the term a narrow construction, holding that an alien does not become a national simply by signing a statement of allegiance in a naturalization application, Perdomo-Padilla, 333 F.3d at 972, or by serving in the U.S. armed forces after taking the standard military oath of allegiance. Reyes-Alcaraz v. Ashcroft, 363 F.3d 937, 939-41 (9th Cir. 2004). http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0310327p.pdf
Unbelievable that such a complete moron can come to hold public office!
“If they have guns they are pretty likely to commit a crime.”
100% AGREED!
IF you’re talking about the PIGS, that is.
Scumbag commie jewb#tch!!!
Orwell
THEY ARE THE ONES USING “GUNS” TO COMMIT CRIMES. SAME OLE JEWISH PLOY…. SCREAM VICTIM WHILE KILLING YOU……..OY VEY!!!!!!!!!!!
She wants to arrest everyone who has a gun? LOL, good luck with that. What is that, like 80 million people at least?
Apparently this quote has been dug up like an old corpse. She hasn’t been a State Senator since 1994. Apparently booted out of office for proposing gun control legislation. Born and raised in Palo Alto, CA – figures.
And yes, liberals ARE that stupid….. and that wicked.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Libertarian/comments/2zltcs/we_must_be_able_to_arrest_people_before_they/
http://www.vermontfolklifecenter.org/multimedia/radio/golden-dome/bios/carlson.htm
I checked this story out. She didn’t say that. More passing on of false reporting.