Every single action taken is a precursor to a future action. That’s something that not enough people understand. All of these things that sound like such good ideas when they happen to the “enemy,” whoever that might be? They seem a whole lot less like good ideas when they happen to you. Americans are getting exactly the country they asked for and they don’t like it at all.
The astounding levels of cognitive dissonance make it impossible for some people to see that they themselves were the ones who set the precedents for things happening today. If you give the government – any government, not just ours – an inch, they will take a mile, and I guarantee some of that mile will be to your own detriment.
Let’s examine some events that are causing uproars and then look back to when it seemed like a good idea.
The Border Control is really taking the whole “control” thing seriously.
Here’s another place where folks were cheering until it happened to them. The scene at the US-Mexico border has been a tense one recently as the Trump administration cracks down on illegal aliens entering the United States. While some people strenuously object, many others have rejoiced over these policies.
Except when the policies extend a bit further within the US. Did you know that the Border Patrol can ask for your “papers” within a hundred miles of any US border? They’ve been setting up checkpoints in places like the middle of Maine and asking people trying to go about their everyday business to prove their citizenship. According to the ACLU, two-thirds of the population of America lives within this “border zone.” And if you are in that zone, you can be asked by Border Patrol to prove you are allowed to be here.
If you refuse to cooperate, you can be detained, although if you are 26-100 miles from the border, your vehicle cannot be searched without a warrant.
If you’re closer to the border, however, you can be subject to even more thorough inspections.
Within 25 miles of the border, though, the Border Patrol has even broader powers, including the right to enter private property (except houses) without a warrant. (source)
To many, it seemed like a great idea when it was happening to Mexican folks near the border, didn’t it? It sounds perfectly fine to some people when Hispanic families in LA are questioned. But they don’t like it so much when it’s carloads of folks in the middle of Maine.
Sarah Huckabee-Sanders was asked to leave a restaurant.
Sarah Huckabee-Sanders, the press secretary for the Trump administration, had sat down to eat dinner at a restaurant in Lexington, Virginia on Friday night when she was asked by the owner to leave because she works for the President.
Last night I was told by the owner of Red Hen in Lexington, VA to leave because I work for @POTUS and I politely left. Her actions say far more about her than about me. I always do my best to treat people, including those I disagree with, respectfully and will continue to do so
— Stephanie Grisham (@PressSec) June 23, 2018
Conservatives are outraged that Sanders was asked to leave the restaurant. And they’re also worried because there seems to be an outright war of public ostracism brewing against them. Congresswoman Maxine Waters has called for physical confrontations of anyone who works for the White House.
But let’s back up a few years. Do you remember when a bakery in Colorado refused to make a cake for the wedding reception of a same-sex couple? Do you remember how many of these very same conservatives cheered on the bakery and said that they shouldn’t have to go against their religious beliefs? Do you remember when Hobby Lobby refused to pay for birth control for their employees?
This is exactly the same thing as someone refusing, based on their personal philosophies, to serve the Press Secretary at a restaurant. You can’t have it both ways.
And, really, you shouldn’t. Private businesses should be able to do business with whomever they want and should be able to refuse service to people with whom they do not wish to do business. It was recently upheld by the Supreme Court earlier this month in a surprising victory for freedom.
I guess what I’m saying is that people have the right to be outwardly biased if that’s how they really feel. And we who disagree have the right to no longer patronize their businesses. Call it the free market, call it freedom of association – but this is how things work. (Please note that I am not condoning cruelty or violence.) If you think it’s okay for Christian bakers to refuse to serve gay patrons, you must also be okay with Sarah Huckabee-Sanders being kicked out of a restaurant.
If you cheered on the Colorado bakery owners and Hobby Lobby, being outraged because it happened to Sarah Huckabee-Sanders is the height of hypocrisy.
The TSA was established for your own protection.
Remember when the Transportation Security Administration was established after 9/11? Frightened people were initially thrilled that they were being “protected” but I think we can all now agree that the TSA is completely out of control.
Everyone has seen the videos of humiliated grandmothers being patted down, publicly and intimately. We were all outraged when we saw a sobbing little 3-year-old girl in a wheelchair who was so traumatized that she no longer wanted to go to Disneyworld after they took away her dolly and thoroughly frisked her.
Remember? Many people didn’t just ask for this. They begged for it. They wanted to be “protected.” It seemed like a good idea at the time to them, but now it’s not that good anymore.
Are you starting to see a pattern here?
When you take away freedom from one group, it’s only a matter of time until those chickens come home to roost. Even though it’s been quoted so often that it’s become a cliche, it brings to mind that poem by the German Lutheran pastor, Martin Niemoller:
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me. (source)
The government is like an invasive plant species. If you give them one little bed in the garden, it’s only a matter of time before they creep out of it. The next thing you know they’re covering everything, choking out the other plant life, damaging the structure of your buildings, and requiring you to fight your way through the vines.
So for all the people begging for our guns to be taken away, what will you think when the police and military are the only people with guns and you have no way to protect yourself?
For the people who think separating families at the border is great, how will you feel if your children are forcibly taken away to be publicly educated when you wanted to homeschool?
For the people who want to insist that your kid be “fully vaccinated” to attend public events, how are you going to feel when there’s some medical treatment with which you disagree forced on your own child “for the greater good?”
The next time you hear a question that starts with the phrase, “Do you think the government should -”
The answer is no. It’s always no. Because if you think some arbitrary rule should be forced on somebody else, eventually that rule will be forced on you, too.
If you are willing to give away someone else’s freedom and to allow others to be mistreated, don’t be one bit surprised when the same thing happens to you.
Hell..
I asked for a double whopper with cheese.
And I got a quarter pounder with cheese.
And just to add insult to injury. …
I analyze sht.
Because that’s my program.
But is it just me or what…
I’ve seen this fat Mexican btch…
With a boil in the middle of her head.
Working at Wal-Mart. ..
Kmart…
KFC…
And now she’s working at O’Reilly auto parts.
I can verify this.
I got a mothrfkng receipt.
Are they cloning these btches.?
Because I really need to know.
The problem is they asked. It is only to be had by demand from the barrel of a gun.
I remember in the mid 60’s, people got on the band wagon for the Civil Rights Act, they got it and 10 years later, a lot of the same people bitched. In the mid 60’s, jew went to the south and demanded black must have rights, 10 years later the jews were bitching about the black invasion. That is the problem, people think, NOW and not 5-10-15 years into the future and what could happen
Exactly (good one, Daisy!)…every time I’m around someone speaks about wanting the border wall I remind them of this–you do realize the purpose of the border wall is to KEEP US IN, doncha know!