DHS considers gamers & photographers a suspicious activity

MassPrivateI

The current case, known as Gill et al. v. Department of Justice et al (Gill v. DOJ), seeks to halt the standards that define the entire NSI program. If Gill was successful, it could effectively stop it.

The case involves five Americans—“two photographers, one white man who is a devout Muslim, and two men of Middle Eastern and South Asian descent”—according to the original July 2014 complaint. Among others, lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union brought the case.  

Lead plaintiff Wiley Gill is a white man who converted to Islam as a student at California State University, Chico, and he drew the attention of the Chico Police Department in May 2012. (Chico is about 180 miles due north of San Francisco.) According to the SAR about Gill, the officer entered Gill’s residence in response to an apparent domestic violence incident (Gill was home alone). The officer then saw on a webpage “titled something similar to ‘Games that fly under the radar’” on Gill’s computer.

“Coupled with the fact he is unemployed, appears to shun law enforcement contact, has potential access to flight simulators via the Internet which he tried to minimize is worthy of note,” the SAR, entitled “Suspicious Male Subject in Possession of Flight Simulator Game,” concludes.

In October 2014, the govt responded to the suit with a motion to dismiss, arguing among other things that the plaintiffs lacked standing. The feds believed that none of the plaintiffs can prove a “legally cognizable injury.”

Playing games and using the internet are inherently suspicious because of this tenuous thread:

The 9/11 terrorists used flight simulators to train for their attacks. (The SAR guidelines warn that “acquisition of expertise” related to “aviation activity” is suspicious enough to be awarded a capital “S.”) Had the Chico Police Dept. bothered to toss a little respect the Fourth Amendment’s way, Gill would likely be nothing more than just some guy looking for a job rather than currently involved in a federal civil rights lawsuit over government surveillance.

This tiny bit of unrelated “data” was gathered by the Chico PD, which entered Gill’s residence without a warrant or his consent. According to the lawsuit filed by the ACLU, the “domestic violence call” that predicated the search of Gill’s residence was likely bogus and only used as justification to search a residence the CPD planned to search anyway. For the better part of two years, Gill had several previous “interactions” with Chico police officers, almost all of them based solely on his appearance (“full beard and traditional garb,” “pious demeanor”) and religious activities. 

However, Judge Richard Seeborg did not buy the govt’s argument:

The allegations of the complaint, however, show that the gravamen of the alleged injuries lie not in actions of “front line” authorities standing alone, but in the fact that those authorities, pursuant to the guidance and training provided by defendants, submit SAR reports under criteria and circumstances that are allegedly inconsistent with legal principles and policies embodied in other law. Plaintiffs’ cognizable challenge is not to the conduct of law enforcement or private security officers during the alleged encounters per se, although there is at least some implication that plaintiffs believe Defendants’ Standards lead front line personnel to overreach even at the point of making initial observations. Plaintiffs are claiming injury from what occurs after the encounters, pursuant to the Standards.

Gill did nothing more than “look Muslim” and play videogames. Other plaintiffs did little more than commit photography.

Internationally-renowned photographer (and former Sara Lee/Levi’s executive), James Prigoff, became the subject of a Suspicious Activity Report for trying to take photographs of something that has been previously photographed hundreds of times without incident:

The “Rainbow Swash” painting that adorns a Boston oil refinery’s storage tank. Prigoff was approached by the company’s security guards and told he couldn’t photograph the oft-photographed storage tank. Despite leaving and providing no contact information, Prigoff was visited by a member of the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force shortly after returning to his home in Sacramento.

Plaintiff Aaron Conklin, a graphic design student, was approached by sheriff’s deputies while photographing a refinery. He was told he would be put on a “NSA watchlist.”
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/02/suspicious-male-in-possession-of-flight-simulator-game-lawsuit-moves-ahead/
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150225/09584130140/lawsuit-over-dhs-first-amendment-violating-suspicious-activity-reports-given-green-light-judge.shtml
 
DHS/FBI’s latest B.S. Warning: Protestors/activists might attack emergency vehicles 

The Virginia Fusion Center (VFC) has observed via open sources that actors affiliated with the Anonymous hacktivist movement released a video which purportedly identifies a Chicago Office of Emergency Management and Communications (OEMC) vehicle as a tool for law enforcement wiretapping efforts by police and fusion center personnel in Chicago, Illinois. In other words the public identified police using “Stingray” cellphone surveillance.

Click here & here to read more.

The VFC is sharing this information for situational awareness, as emergency management vehicles operating near protest areas may be targeted by precipitating violent or malicious activity.

How is identifying govt vehicles that are illegally spying on Americans a pre-cursor to violence? It’s beyond reason and B.S.! This is the American Police State we live in, expose govt. wrongdoing and you’re considered a threat!

Need more proof of the American Police State lunacy? The DHS/FBI even considers staying at hotels to be suspicious.

http://massprivatei.blogspot.com/2015/03/dhs-considers-gamers-photographers.html

5 thoughts on “DHS considers gamers & photographers a suspicious activity

  1. We are all under suspicion of illegal thoughts and actions, thereby making it easier to target us as disloyal to the Matrix.

  2. Everything is “suspicious activity”, because the goal is to pry their noses into everyone’s business. Ending privacy ends freedom, because when you’re always watched, you’re not doing what you want; you’re doing what you think the cameras want to see.

    With privacy gone you’ll spend your life hiding from the telescreen just like Winston Smith, and making sure that none of your inner thoughts are exposed by your actions.

    THAT is why surveillance is bad, even if you’re not doing anything wrong, you’re not doing what you want to, either.

  3. domestically of course.
    expect the noose to get tighter and tighter because even they NSA know what’s coming and everything has to be in place. “ain’t that right guys/gals”

  4. Why don’t they just say “Everything is a suspicious activity” and get it over with. Enough with the bullshit, already.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published.


*