Washington Examiner – by Paul Bedard
In the latest partisan escalation on the Federal Election Commission, a top Democratic commissioner has ripped a Republican commissioner’s bid to protect books, radio and Internet media from regulation as “pitiful.”
Ann Ravel, a former FEC chairwoman, joined other Democrats at a meeting this month to block Republican Lee Goodman’s proposal to explicitly expand the “press exemption” from regulations to books, satellite radio and Internet-based news media.
In pushing his plan aside, Ravel said that she didn’t have enough time to consider Goodman’s proposal.
Goodman noted that the proposal has been under consideration for a while.
actually I was wrong, Dave. He chose the Daily Caller instead. Pitiful.
— Ann Ravel (@AnnMRavel) September 30, 2016
That prompted Ravel to mock that Goodman’s public argument was meant to feed a story to the Washington Examiner, which has covered his concerns that FEC Democrats are trying to regulate conservative media, especially news outlets and news aggregators like the Drudge Report that are online.
“I presume you’re just trying to utilize this argument for theWashington Examiner,” she said.
That comment was tweeted by Dave Levinthal, a senior reporter for the Center for Public Integrity, who follows elections and the FEC.
Ravel later tweeted a correction. “@davelevinthal @dcexaminer @FEC actually I was wrong, Dave. He chose the Daily Caller instead. Pitiful.”
Goodman told Secrets that the latest attack on his proposals again show that Democrats are hostile to free press rights generally and in the past he has noted their antagonism to conservative media which is heavily internet based and on the radio, including Sirius/XM. Ravel’s “pitiful” comment appeared to refer to conservative news attention to Goodman’s proposal.
“Once again, Commissioner Ravel has chosen to inject divisive ad hominem rhetoric into an honest debate about the scope of press freedom in America,” he said.
“Instead of name-calling, Commissioner Ravel should explain why she wants to assert the power as a government official to ban books and motion pictures. She also owes an explanation for what appears to be a prejudice toward press organizations like Fox News, Washington Examiner and Daily Caller.”
Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner’s “Washington Secrets” columnist, can be contacted at pbedard@washingtonexaminer.com
It’s always the “liberals” who are trying to shut down free speech so they can keep everyone filled with their BS and nothing else.
Obviously they can only win a debate by making every other argument illegal.
“Goodman told Secrets that the latest attack on his proposals again show that Democrats are hostile to free press rights generally…”
That’s why we need a good ‘ol Republican for Prez, right? 🙄
First, Chump’s gonna save the internet, then he’s gonna save U.S.