BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — More than a half-century after a Louisiana teen was sent to prison for killing a sheriff’s deputy and nearly a year after the nation’s highest court ruled in his favor, the now 71-year-old inmate will have to wait up to two months longer for his first chance at parole.
Louisiana’s parole board on Thursday postponed its scheduled hearing for Henry Montgomery, who was 17 when he shot and killed East Baton Rouge Parish sheriff’s deputy Charles Hurt in 1963. Jim Wise, vice-chairman of the Louisiana Board of Pardons and Committee on Parole, said the board needs a legal opinion from Louisiana’s attorney general to resolve an apparent conflict between two laws governing parole hearings: One says a three-member panel must decide parole for juvenile offenders, while another says anyone convicted of crimes against a law enforcement officer must face a panel of five members or more.
Wise said he hopes to reschedule the hearing for within 60 days. The announcement surprised two relatives of the slain deputy, including one who drove in from Arkansas to attend the hearing. Montgomery, meanwhile, remains at the Louisiana State Penitentiary in Angola, where he appeared with his lawyer by video link.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s January 2016 ruling in Montgomery’s case opened the door for roughly 2,000 other juvenile offenders to argue for their release after receiving mandatory life-without-parole sentences.
In June, a state judge who resentenced Montgomery to life with the possibility of parole called him a “model prisoner” who appears to be rehabilitated. But the slain deputy’s grandson said he plans to urge the parole board to keep Montgomery in prison.
Keith Nordyke, Montgomery’s attorney for the parole board proceedings, said his client has completed a 100-hour “pre-release course” and received other services to help with his transition if he is released from prison. But he said freedom wouldn’t come easy for Montgomery after decades behind bars.
“I call it ‘Rip Van Winkle syndrome.’ The world has passed him by in many respects,” he said. “We’re talking about somebody who has never held a cellphone in his hands. He’s never experienced a computer.”
Montgomery initially was sentenced to death after a jury convicted him of fatally shooting Hurt, less than two weeks after his 17th birthday. After the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled he didn’t get a fair trial and threw out his murder conviction in 1966, Montgomery was retried, found “guilty without capital punishment” and automatically sentenced to life without parole.
In 2012, however, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that mandatory sentencing of juvenile homicide offenders to life without possibility of parole is unconstitutional “cruel and unusual” punishment. In deciding Montgomery’s case last year, the nation’s highest court extended a ban on mandatory life-without-parole for juvenile offenders to those already in prison. The decision ushered in a wave of new sentences and the release of dozens of inmates in states from Michigan to Pennsylvania, Arkansas and beyond.
Other former teen offenders still are waiting for a chance at resentencing in states and counties that have been slow to address the court ruling, an earlier Associated Press investigation found. In Michigan, for example, prosecutors are seeking new no-parole sentences for nearly two-thirds of 363 juvenile lifers. Those cases are on hold until the Michigan Supreme Court, which heard arguments in October, determines whether judges or juries should decide the fate of those inmates.
A new Louisiana law makes juvenile lifers eligible for release after 25 years in prison — unless a prosecutor intervenes. The state’s district attorneys have asked judges to deny parole eligibility to 84 of the 255 inmates covered by the law, or about one in three cases, according to the Louisiana Center for Children’s Rights, an advocacy group.
A few Louisiana prosecutors are seeking to deny parole eligibility in most of their cases. Some district attorneys report case numbers that vary from the group’s tally, but not enough to make a significant difference in the statewide percentage it cites.
In the U.S. Supreme Court’s majority opinion for Montgomery’s case, Justice Anthony Kennedy said prisoners like him “must be given the opportunity to show their crime did not reflect irreparable corruption; and, if it did not, their hope for some years of life outside prison walls must be restored.”
Montgomery’s lawyers said he has strived to be a positive role model for other prisoners, serving as a coach and trainer for a boxing team he helped form inside prison. Hurt was married and had three children. Jean Paul deGravelles, a grandson of the slain deputy, said he plans to address the parole board and oppose Montgomery’s release. He said Montgomery, at 17, was old enough to know right from wrong when he shot Hurt, who was looking for truants when he crossed paths with the school-skipping teenager.
“This man went to trial twice, both times found guilty,” said deGravelles, a captain at the Lafourche Parish Sheriff’s Office. “What’s so different now than when he killed (Hurt) 50 years ago? The situation hasn’t changed.”
“…vice-chairman of the Louisiana Board of Pardons and Committee on Parole, said the board needs a legal opinion from Louisiana’s attorney general to resolve an apparent conflict between two laws governing parole hearings….”
So you’re telling me that the Board of Pardons and Committee on Parole doesn’t understand the laws governing parole hearings?
BS. They need another two months to set up his illegal execution.