Obama Unhappy with America’s Constitutional Balance of Powers

Obama's Constitutional Balance of Powers.Militia News – by Chris Banescu

President “I am not a dictator” Obama, the same man who once bemoaned that the U.S. Constitution is deeply flawed and America’s Founding Fathers had “an enormous blind spot” when they wrote it, is again complaining that our Constitutional Republic does not satisfy his dictatorial aspirations. Apparently, the inconvenience of having each state represented equally in the Senate is inconveniencing his ability to shove his leftist personal agenda down the throat of Congress and the American people.  

As the Washington Times reports:

At a Democratic fundraiser in Chicago Thursday night, Mr. Obama told a small group of wealthy supporters that there are several hurdles to keeping Democrats in control of the Senate and recapturing the House. One of those problems, he said, is the apportionment of two Senate seats to each state regardless of population.

“Obviously, the nature of the Senate means that California has the same number of Senate seats as Wyoming. That puts us at a disadvantage,” Mr. Obama said.

The Founding Fathers decided in the “Great Compromise” in 1787 to apportion House seats based on population and give each state two seats in the Senate regardless of population. The solution was a compromise between large states and small states in a dispute that nearly dissolved the Constitutional Convention.

The president also blamed “demographics” for the inability of the Democratic Party to gain more power in Congress, saying Democrats “tend to congregate a little more densely” in cities such as New York and Chicago. He said it gives Republicans disproportional clout in Congress.

Thankfully for us and for America, our Founding Fathers knew exactly what they were doing when they drafted the Constitution and set up specific checks and balances to divest power away from any one individual or branch of government. As men who experienced tyranny first-hand, they understood what always happens when corrupt and unscrupulous individuals desire, acquire, and centralize power, at the expense of the life, liberty, and property of individuals. For now, their wisdom is providing us with some cover and protection from the relentless assaults from so many home-grown enemies of freedom and liberty.

Written by Chris Banescu.


3 thoughts on “Obama Unhappy with America’s Constitutional Balance of Powers

  1. If he weren’t a tyrant (or potential dictator), he’d have no problem with his power being limited by the constitution.

    He’s an administrator, not a King, and the constitution outlines his job for him. If he were there to do his job, there would be no need for discussion. The debate only arises because he wants more power than the constitution grants him, thus defining him as a tyrant.

    There’s no “blind spot” in the constitution until a tyrant tastes power and desires more of it.

  2. Well a “compromise” was made by our Founding Fathers and Mr. Barry “the Communist compromiser” Obama, doesn’t like that compromise. How ironic is that?

    I guess as long as the compromise is in the Communist favor then, it’s OK, such as the compromise on our gun rights. But when a compromise goes against the Communist agenda, then it is no good. I see how it is.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published.