When you look into your copy of The US Constitution you will NOT SEE The So-called Bureau of Land Management

Nesara – by John MacHaffie

When you look into your copy of The US Constitution you will NOT SEE The So-called Bureau of Land Management! It is not in the 22 Enumerated Powers of Congress of our US Constitution. Therefore it can not exist! It is unconstitutional and therefore illegal.

Any American that can read can know  what is and is not authorized by our Constitution. Bureau of Land Management is not in The Constitution and has no business being in Nevada! BLM  does not exist! Agencies and all Departments [except the Departments of Army and Navy] are also not in our Constitution and do not exist in our creature government.   

Remember, The People of The States created our US Constitution and then created a creature government which must “SUPPORT” the Constitution, Article 6, second paragraph . And real Presidents must not only “Support” the Constitution but also “Preserve, Protect and Defend The Constitution”, Article 2 Section 2 and in the same paragraph “must see that the laws are faithfully executed”. This is his sworn oath!

In Article 2 Section 3, the acting President must “Take care that laws be faithfully executed!”

Has he done these things that are required by a President? NO!

Senator Harry Reid, from Nevada,  has not supported the Constitution either. They are breaking their oaths and should be removed from office!

Nevada is a SOVEREIGN STATE and The people of Nevada are each SOVEREIGN  individuals with their own laws and with their own land. The federal government has no authority in Nevada!

Article one section 8 also says that CONGRESS has” exclusive legislative powers” over a District   [Not to exceed 10 miles square], and may, by cession of  particular  states and by the acceptance of congress,  be the seat of government.

Likewise, “Congress can exercise like authority over all places bought  by the consent of the legislature of the state and for the specific purposes of “Erection of Forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards and other needful buildings”.

Notice there is no mention of the Bureau of Land Management! It doesn’t mention National Forests either.


9 thoughts on “When you look into your copy of The US Constitution you will NOT SEE The So-called Bureau of Land Management

  1. Install a new Governor and sheriff by emergency order……send in the guard and stop paying lip service to the 2nd amendment and use the damn thing. We don’t want violence….bullshit…..GET THE HELL OUT OF NEVADA…RIGHT NOW FEDS….that’s my dream….this is no time for political correctness.

      1. Defending freedom? Yeah, I know what that is….I’ve been there. It’s unconstitutional as hell and that needs to be met with a real desire to defend it. I’ve stood alone before defending my rights against a corrupt Public entity while the politically correct people around me sat silent with their thumbs up their ass. I know what’s -up.

  2. Hell,am still seeking a interpreter/decoding ring to show me where in the 2nd it mentions permits/weather/law abiding citizen/magazine capacity and all the other things politicians get involved with regarding that!I certainly don’t have the time to also seek out blm duties with in the bill of rights/constitution!

    1. It is an unalienable/inalienable NATURAL right. They (the US governments – federal and state) are forbidden to modify it, interpret it, change it, abolish it, etc. The Bill of Rights are – as William Blackstone (in “Commentaries on the Laws of England”) defined unalienable rights:

      “Those rights, then, which God and nature have established, and therefore called natural rights, such as life and liberty, need not the aid of human laws to be more effectually invested in every man than they are; neither do they receive any additional strength when declared by the municipal laws to be inviolable. On the contrary, no human legislature has power to abridge or destroy them, unless the owner shall himself commit some act that amounts to a forfeiture.”

      Inalienable rights: “a right according to natural law, a right that cannot be taken away, denied, or transferred”.

      2nd Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

      Regulars were soldiers trained to the regulation or arms, to the proper and effective military use of arms: pikes, swords, grenades, cannon, bayonets, and small arms. A “regular” was a professional; a trained, and effective soldier. “Well-regulated” Militia means a well trained militia.

      From the People who were there and would know – and some court cases:

      “A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies.” George Washington

      The Constitution says exactly which laws that any federal law enforcement or agency has jurisdiction over. This was upheld in the courts for those that believe that the courts have a “jurisdiction of interpretation” – which they do not.

      U.S. Supreme Court CAHA v. U.S., 152 U.S. 211: “Generally speaking, within any state of this Union the preservation of the peace and the protection of person and property are the functions of the state government, and are NO PART of the primary duty, at least, of the nation. The laws of congress in respect to those matters DO NOT extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force ONLY in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government.”

      Rost v. Municipal Court of Southern Judicial District of San Mateo (1960): “The Legislature, either by amending or otherwise, may not nullify a constitutional provision.”

      Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189, 1920: Congress … cannot by legislation alter the Constitution, from which alone it derives its power to legislate, and within whose limitations alone that power can be lawfully exercised.

      Fina Supply, Inc. v. Abilene Nat. Bank, 726 S.W.2d 537, 1987 it says “Party having superior knowledge who takes advantage of another’s ignorance of the law to deceive him by studied concealment or misrepresentation can be held responsible for that conduct.”

      Brookfield Construction Company V. Stewart 284 F Sup. 94: “An officer who acts in violation of the constitution ceases to represent the government.”

      Richard Henry Lee, Senator, 1st Congress: To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.”

      Richard Henry Lee, Senator, 1st Congress: “A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves … and include all men capable of bearing arms.”

      John Adams, 2nd US President: “You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; rights derived from the Great Legislator of the Universe” .

      Madison specified in Federalist 45: “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former (fed gov) will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.”

      Art IV Sec 2, Clause 14 says, “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States”

      Abraham Lincoln: “We, the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution.” 

      The Supreme Court has cited St. George Tucker – a lawyer, Revolutionary War militia officer, legal scholar, and later a U.S. District Court judge – in the major cases of virtually every Supreme Court era. He wrote of the Second Amendment:

      “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, and this without any qualification as to their condition or degree, as is the case in the British government.”
      “This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty… The right of self-defense is the first law of nature…”
      “The congress of the United States possesses no power to regulate, or interfere with the domestic concerns, or police of any state: IT BELONGS NOT TO THEM TO ESTABLISH ANY RULES RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF PROPERTY; NOR WILL THE CONSTITUTION PERMIT ANY PROHIBITION OF ARMS TO THE PEOPLE;…”

      William Rawle, wrote “A View of the Constitution of the United States of America” which was a constitutional law textbook at West Point and other institutions. Rawle was a respected constitutional authority and an early commentator who actually voted to ratify the Bill of Rights. “The prohibition is general. No clause in the constitution could by any rule of construction be conceived to give congress a power to disarm the people. Such a flagitious attempt could only be made under some general pretence by a state legislature. But if in any blind pursuit of inordinate power, either should attempt it, this amendment may be appealed to as a restraint on both”.

      And “neither the states nor the national government has legitimate authority to disarm its citizens”.

      Justice Story, Supreme Court Associate Justice wrote a constitutional commentary in 1833, “Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States”. Regarding the Second Amendment, he wrote of the 2nd Amendment:

      The importance of this article will scarcely be doubted by any persons, who have duly reflected upon the subject. The militia is the natural defence of a free country against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections, and domestic usurpations of power by rulers. It is against sound policy for a free people to keep up large military establishments and standing armies in time of peace, both from the enormous expenses, with which they are attended, and the facile means, which they afford to ambitious and unprincipled rulers, to subvert the government, or trample upon the rights of the people. The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.’

      Cockrum v. State: “The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers delegated directly to the citizen, and is excepted out of the general powers of government. A LAW CANNOT BE PASSED TO INFRINGE UPON OR IMPAIR IT, BECAUSE IT IS ABOVE THE LAW, AND INDEPENDENT OF THE LAWMAKING POWER.

      I personally think that they made it VERY clear that neither the feds nor the states have any legal authority over what arms we carry, how we carry them, or even if we keep them within vehicles and/or our homes.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *