The Daily Sheeple – by Melissa Dykes
Watch Ben Swann rip apart the all the gun control pundits who have been casually rewriting the 2nd Amendment.
We’ve heard ridiculous claims that the 2nd Amendment is “outdated” or worthless because the government is armed to the teeth far and away over the citizenry. We’ve heard semantic arguments that the 2nd Amendment never meant for “individuals” to protect themselves but was only for “militias” (as if a militia is not comprised of individuals).
The bottom line?
“The Second Amendment is not about hunting, or even just defense of your own home,” Swann says. “It was written by men who ultimately believed that governments and armies would turn on their own people.”
Delivered by The Daily Sheeple
Contributed by Melissa Dykes of The Daily Sheeple.
Melissa Dykes is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheepleand a co-creator of Truthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa also co-founded Nutritional Anarchy with Daisy Luther of The Organic Prepper, a site focused on resistance through food self-sufficiency. Wake the flock up!
“It was written by men who ultimately believed that governments and armies would turn on their own people.”
And they didn’t require a psychic to tell them that.
It was written by men that had experience with government and military turn on its own people , and instead of ignoring that fact they made moves against it happening in this country again and we should never allow all that work to be done in vain
They probably didn’t need someone to fortell the future , because in their past they had already delt with .. The kinda bullshit the gov. are trying on us now ,daily
Exactly!
That’s why they didn’t require a psychic.
***We’ve heard ridiculous claims that the 2nd Amendment is “outdated” or worthless because the government is armed to the teeth far and away over the citizenry.***
For most of our history, the argument that the government had the population outgunned was indeed ridiculous. The argument failed to take into account the difference between a conventional war between states on different territories, and a guerrilla war in which the combatants live amongst each other and depend on the same food supply, infrastructure, and so forth.
In recent years, however, the argument is beginning to look more plausible. Disturbingly so. The fedcoats are not invincible yet, but the tools of oppression available to them — including surveillance technology and robotics — continue to develop at an explosive rate. Similar tools of defense are rarely available to the private citizen unless he has the extensive technical background needed to create his own.
There is little question that it would have been MUCH easier to get a guerrilla resistance off the ground 10-20 years ago than it would be if someone tried today. In another 10 years, it may be impossible, and then the Second Amendment really will be obsolete. Basically, we will be screwed just as soon as scientist and engineers solve certain technological limitations that I’d rather not mention publicly.