7 Things Truth Seekers Should Stop Doing in 2015

Activist Post – by Bernie Suarez

Yet another new year is upon us, and those of us fully awakened can see that the globalist plan to control humanity is rolling forward at superhighway speed as our battle for humanity rages on. So let’s ask the question, what can we do as truth seekers to improve our odds of success against this global cabal of control and oppression? Is there anything worth throwing on the table with the advent of the new year for truth seekers to consider that could actually act as a game-changer in this battle for truth, freedom, and consciousness? Actually there is.   

I deeply pondered on this issue as we begin a new year and I want to share seven points that could make a big difference in our battle for humanity by bringing truth seekers together on the same page so that we can act more effectively, more efficiently and have a greater impact on the world around us in the new year. Here are seven things I believe all truth seekers should stop doing (if they are doing these), so that we can gel as a movement and strengthen our presence and impact on the consciousness of the current world. These points, I believe, will help us leave our mark on history as we push forward with the current information war of today.

1 – Stop labeling everyone who doesn’t agree with you on every single issue, as “controlled opposition”

I now hear it all the time. This person and that person is “controlled opposition.” We know factually that the U.S. government has indeed co-opted (to put it lightly) many movements in America in the past, dating back to the 1960s and before. There is no question that government employs controlled opposition to stifle and derail movements. The phrase, “the truth shall set you free,”comes to mind. It is exponentially more important for truth seekers to fight the good fight, do their own research, check the authenticity of claims with verifiable facts and science, i.e. search for truth. Most importantly, determine what your main purpose is, and then focus on what means most to you instead of burning all your energy trying to warn others who the controlled opposition is or isn’t. Consider that, ultimately, if you are wrong about your accusation, this will serve to divide the movement further and potentially create more damage than good to the movement.

We all know that the trolls and shills that regularly appear on mainstream media are ALL by definition controlled opposition, but what about the person that is doing a lot of work to expose evil and state crimes against humanity? What about the perceived leader who is tirelessly working to expose the actual globalists, the Illuminati, and the long-term plans of the new world order? Is that person also controlled opposition if you don’t agree with everything they are saying? Perhaps they inadvertently are; however, shouldn’t those people be given credit for the good that they are doing to expose the globalist plans?

Example: I believe truth prevails, and if someone is working hard on one issue while declaring other things that you or I may not completely agree is true, then it might be better in the long run to say to others that person X has a message A, B and C of which you only agree with A and B and you’re hoping messenger X comes around on item C – or just be firm, you don’t agree with item C. This less aggressive approach alone could help the truth movement become stronger rather than pulling out the shotgun and tearing down the messenger all together over one issue.

Some people may do this with good intentions feeling they are “saving” the truth movement from a “disinformation” agent; but, in reality, truth seekers today are smart and not everyone believes every single thing that someone says anyway. If these people working hard in the truth movement are truly controlled opposition, I believe we should at least give credit for the “opposition” part of what they do and ignore the “controlled” part. Or, if you feel strongly, don’t accept the person all together but don’t spend all your energy bad mouthing that person. Instead spend you time in a more productive manner.

It’s a tough topic and understandably every case is unique. Ultimately, however, if each and every single one of us focused primarily on being the change and (as the late Michael Ruppert once said) picking up your weapon and firing it – we wouldn’t have so much time to attack or “expose” those who we think are “controlled opposition” who in fact may simply have a different opinion. Instead, we’ll be active making a name for ourselves as individuals who are the actual effective “opposition.” If everyone did this, I believe those that truly are controlled opposition inside the movement will eventually reveal themselves, as we have seen with some individuals this past year. Truth itself is far more important than following and believing someone you want to believe is “all truth.”

2 – Stop pushing only doom and gloom and start focusing on solutions

Some truth seekers only talk about how bad things are. We hear it all the time: The world is always about to end. The control system will never be defeated. They have eternal power and control over you and I and anyone who challenges them will die. Evil is forever, everyone is a sheep. Those who  are awake stand alone, so brace for the inevitable cataclysmic ending. They often may suggest – don’t even bother to share information and awareness because the sheep are too stupid to get it. Instead, they suggest, just look out for yourself!

That’s right, some truth seekers have completely given up on humanity. Unless someone writes about how horrible things are, the messengers are often accused by these very truth seekers of being gullible, naive, maybe even “controlled opposition”!! The attacks go on and on. Scarcity, doom and gloom is here, they warn us, and anyone who doesn’t worship this meme is a thorn in the side of the truth somehow. All of this is nonsense and is derived, I believe, from our own inherent fearful nature combined with our obsession with being right. Certainly many of us can relate to the feeling these doomsday messengers relay. We understand that they may even be right in their predictions. I get it! The world we live in is evil, and we indeed face many insurmountable obstacles.

Message to all who think this way: the world may indeed be over by tomorrow. And, if so, then you win! Congratulations! However, as humans, we must not ever give up. We must fight, and we must continue to have hope and share the hope for tomorrow with each other. Learn the power of hope. Learn the power of people. Yes, we are all the same, regardless of what your skin color is, your gender, your age or even how much money you have in your account. We all seek love and acceptance, and we all buckle to fear. We all need hope for tomorrow and it is incumbent upon us to perpetuate this hope and find and share solutions to overcome the fear.

The enemy wants nothing more than for you to live in fear, worry and hopelessness, so that they can stand on your head and declare victory over you. Call me naive, but I will never give the enemy that easy victory and neither should you. Does it mean we shouldn’t be vigilant? Of course not. There is a big difference between being vigilant and doomsday scaremongering. Learn the power of love, hope, and personal inspiration instead, and put it into practice in your journey for truth. This alone will offer more solutions to humanity than you could ever imagine, even in the face of all the darkness and evil we live in today.

3 – Stop giving a voice to those still echoing opposition to well-established facts

This next item is a pet peeve of mine; and if others don’t agree, that’s okay.

I feel truth seekers should (whenever they can and whenever it is reasonable) stop giving a voice to trolls and shills posting comments online that are entirely against well-known and well-established facts. The prime examples that come to mind are the trolls who phish sites to post comments denying the existence of admitted geoengineering programs known as chemtrails and chembomb spraying.

Despite the overwhelming evidence available to our own eyes every single day, and the evidence collected by the movement over the years, here we are in 2015 and still the “contrails” trolls continue their online campaign.

Well it’s time to cut them off. Remove all their comments from your channel, blog site or other platforms. Specifically with chemtrails spraying, these (paid?) trolls need YOUR platform to spread their lies, deception and Department of Defense propaganda and unfortunately too often you may be giving it to them. I say silence their voices on your platform to help accelerate understanding for the sake of those who are new to the issue.

Remember, these DOD trolls (to borrow the example of chemtrails) only need a Web platform to have their voices heard, which they know they can get any time with mainstream media sites. They go out of their way, however, to visit KNOWN truth and consciousness sites and channels, (which they obviously disagree with) to drop their (paid for?) messages. Why then would we (truth seekers) help them out?? At a glance, the same could be said for 9/11 truth, JFK and other issues.

Yes, I can’t believe I’m saying this. I’m actually advocating censorship to some degree and perhaps I’m wrong, but I stand behind my conviction at this time. I say it’s time to move forward with helping and healing humanity, and silencing the (Gov’t Intelligence provided) online trolls could go a very long way in our journey to improve spreading awareness!

4 – Stop demonizing those who try to be positive as unrealistic dreamers

As discussed above (point #2). Many truth seekers demonize those who are positive and share the message of hope as “unrealistic” or naive “dreamers.” Instead, consider the points above and remember that throughout the history of humanity, all evidence points to the fact that humans are capable of incredible things and these things are made possible by hope, positivity, and belief in yourself and humanity. As has often been said, it takes ONE person to change the world. On the other hand, throughout history there are no examples of anyone using fear, doom and gloom to accomplish anything great. Except for one group that is – only the globalist Illuminati cult followers look to promote fear, doom and gloom to accomplish things they consider great.

5 – Stop thinking that the current system will some day somehow repair itself

Speaking of being naive, too many truth seekers really believe that they will someday somehow repair the current system by forcing new legislation and convincing the bad politicians to behave differently by bowing to the demands of new petitions. None of this is based on reality or any political change success models of the past. Massive changes of the magnitude needed now in America usually take several generations to accomplish but, more importantly, massive changes like the ones needed today are accomplished by replacing (not repairing) the current system altogether.

True revolution of thought and a complete breakaway from the modern-day paradigm is needed in order to see true change. The depth of the corruption we have today will not be repaired by convincing one or two politicians with petitions to act differently. Instead, the entire system must be challenged and ultimately replaced.

It doesn’t mean that truth seekers should stop being active or give up hope in what they do. It means that truth seekers should be realistic about immediate results and expectations and what these perceived hoped-for changes will do to our way of life. Realize that dirty politicians will not suddenly wake up and change their ways because of some petition or even court challenge. These politicians must each be replaced entirely for us to move in the right direction.

6 – Stop thinking mainstream media news is true until proven otherwise

Truth seekers in their quest to be correct about what they are saying or believing, too often tend to hear mainstream media news and only debunk it IF they can somehow “prove” to themselves that the piece of news is not true. At a glance, that may sound like a prudent thing to do, but I would like to challenge this notion.

Yes, it is important to be judicious with the facts of a story. However, if we assume that mainstream media holds the power to lay down the original working narrative, then we are empowering the mainstream media without realizing it. In the real world, if someone lied to us every minute of every day, you would never believe anything they had to say at any time. That would be the logical thing to do with someone like this. Most people would agree to this without offering much of an argument.

However, despite knowing how often mainstream media lies, often for the sake of not wanting to sound like a conspiracy nut, truth seekers will initially accept the mainstream media narrative only until after it is proven untrue later on. We reason in our minds that believing mainstream media until proven otherwise must be the logical and the “normal” thing to do, but actually there is no basis for this argument. Instead we should assume that whatever initial claims mainstream media makes are ALSO an unproven (lying nut case) lie that has not been authenticated yet with hard facts. And, yes, we need to look at the current-day mainstream media standard of “evidence” with a magnifying glass since what passes as “evidence” by the mainstream media today is hardly evidence at all.

I believe it is very important to start your individual research into any story with the working hypothesis that the mainstream media has no interest in telling the truth; and their interest, across the board, as proven by the historical facts is to act as a mouthpiece for the State. We can reasonably and logically defend this assumption based on the history of mainstream media’s propensity to tell (State-scripted) lies. Why then do we give any degree of credence to any story they put out??

7 – Stop following leaders and realize we are all leaders

Finally, we need to stop putting truth-seeking perceived leaders on a pedestal like they are gods. Truth and consciousness is a manifestation of humanity. It is not intended to be limited or controlled by one person, one leader or one guru. Instead, it’s meant to be more like a network of truth where every connection and every point counts equally. Government Intelligence loves it when truth seekers look to one person or one perceived leader instead of realizing they are the leaders themselves. This “follow the leader” pack mentality plays into the hands of the opposition, as it makes it easier for the opposition to tear down the entire movement by simply tearing down that ONE leader. A very convenient and efficient tactic, don’t you think?

Realize that the last thing the opposition wants is for every single person to realize that they have the power in them to change the world. To realize that they are the leaders, and to realize they are the change that will make this world a better place. The opposition knows it cannot possibly control the masses individually for there are too many of us. But a single person is much easier to control or destroy.

It doesn’t mean we should resort back to point number 1, and label every leader as “controlled opposition.” It means we should support anyone and everyone who is making a difference, while realizing that we are the leaders as well. It means that you share with people the information instead of glorifying the person who is passing the information.

As we begin the new year, let’s re-elevate our truth-seeking game and create counter strategies so that we can be as effective as possible in waking others up and empowering them with truth. Realize that humanity is up against a sophisticated Intelligence apparatus that knows how to exploit, manipulate, divert, and confuse the masses who seek truth.

Now try applying these seven ideas to your life and see where you can improve your truth-seeking and self-empowerment strategies. If we all do a good job at applying some of these principles, I believe together this will absolutely make for a much brighter and more successful upcoming year.

Peace and love to all and have a truly happy new year!

Bernie Suarez is an activist, critical thinker, radio host, musician, M.D, Veteran, lover of freedom and the Constitution, and creator of the Truth and Art TV project. He also has a background in psychology and highly recommends that everyone watch a documentary titled The Century of the Self. Bernie has concluded that the way to defeat the New World Order is to truly be the change that you want to see. Manifesting the solution and putting truth into action is the very thing that will defeat the globalists.

http://www.activistpost.com/2015/01/7-things-truth-seekers-should-stop.html

4 thoughts on “7 Things Truth Seekers Should Stop Doing in 2015

  1. 1. If someone is indeed “controlled opposition” then either money,Satan or a demon is controlling them…either that or they are afraid of being called “anti-Semitic” (not realizing of course that Ashkenazi Jews aren’t Semites). Follow the money…Alex Jones best example.

    2. Only doom and gloom is for the criminal psychopathic elites…anyone not promoting the fact that We the People WILL WIN and that the biggest slaves on the planet are the criminal psychopathic elites truly is not seeking the truth in all things!

    3. for the author is this it is chemtrails…for me it is Christian Zionism and the denial of humanity for Palestinians just because what these deluded readers of the Scofield Reference Bible believe is that Palestinians should be genocided now because Israel failed to do that 2500 years ago. These folks are simply not worth arguing with…their fear of Genesis 12:3 has already caused them to stumble.

    4. I know what it means to be demonised this way…and it pays to be a denier of gloom and doom (like that stupid “the Illuminati has already won” crap video posted here a couple of weeks ago)

    5. the final straw for me was voting for GW Bush to keep Gore out, then we get the made-it-happen-on-purpose 9-11 false flag. Since then it’s get out of the system as far as you can.

    6. After going to the 1970 Moratorium Anti War March in NYC and then reading the sensationalist reporting of it in the NY Times (“riots, etc.” crap) I stopped believing the MSM…and I wanted to go to college to be a journalist! Fuggettaboutit!

    7. Last leader I followed was that “Republic of Texas” psycho, Rick McLaren…you couldn’t pay me enough to follow a so-called leader now!

  2. I agree that it is time we all work on the things we can agree with together, and the other “fights” that others may refuse to recognize on our own or with others that believe in it.

    I believe the answer to our problem is the constitutionally recognized Militia, which is “We the People” doing our assigned duties. The Militia has as its constitutionally assigned duties to:

    – Enforce the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution (Supreme LA and highest law of the state except where it conflicts with the US Constitution, and the contracts that those that serve within our governments – federal and state – are under),
    – Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
    – Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
    – “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

    The US Constitution guarantees to each state its own “Republican form of government”. It is every state’s Militia that is the ONLY Constitutionally assigned force to “counter Invasions” and “Domestic Violence” within our nation.

    Those that serve within our governments were/are forbidden to create law enforcement or to have standing military because history shows that they are ALWAYS used against the people of that nation.

    That is why all US Presidents can be Commander in Chief of the Militia – which is the ONLY armed body they may use for enforcement purposes WHEN CALLED INTO THE SERVICE OF THE USA. It is also the Militia that defends the nation until a standing army is created – usually from the Militias themselves – to defend the nation from attack.

    Article 2, Section 2: “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, WHEN CALLED INTO THE ACTUAL SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES”

    It is why all state Governors are to use the Militia when needed, not create governmental professional law enforcement.

    It is why the US Constitution REQUIRES us to be armed and to train.

    Joel Barlow, Revolutionary War veteran and American whose political writings were debated on the floor of Parliament said of the US Constitution: “… not only permitting every man to arm, but obliging him to arm.”

    Tench Coxe: “Who are the militia? are they not ourselves. Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American…THE UNLIMITED POWER OF THE SWORD IS NOT IN THE HANDS OF EITHER THE FEDERAL OR STATE GOVERNMENTS BUT, where I trust in God it will ever remain, IN THE HANDS OF THE PEOPLE.”

    Next we need to hold the judges accountable for their actions within the courts. Many believe that they are in for life, but that is to be found no where within the US Constitution, they are ALLOWED to remain in office as long as they use “Good Behaviour” while in office. Life tenure is implied by the “Good Behavior” standard but not listed as a benefit within the US Constitution, because all they have to do to remain office is to their duty constitutionally assigned to them and to keep their Oaths.

    US Constitution, Article III. Section. 1: “The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.”

    James Madison, Federalist 39, 250—53: “According to the provisions of most of the constitutions, again, as well as according to the most respectable and received opinions on the subject, the members of the judiciary department are to retain their offices by the firm tenure of good behaviour.”

    Who decides if a judges behavior is “good” or bad/misbehaved”? We the people do as jurors. The judge is charged with using “Misbehavior” and goes through a trial of a jury of his/her peers – the American people (I know that many of them think they are above that but “All people are created equal” says differently.

    Alexander Hamilton, Federalist 78: ”In a monarchy [the good behavior standard] is an excellent barrier to the despotism of the prince; in a republic it is a no less excellent barrier to the encroachments and oppressions of the representative body….[I]t is the best expedient which can be devised in any government to secure a steady, upright, and impartial administration of the laws.”

    1. If “Good Behaviour” “in a republic… is a no less excellent barrier to the encroachments and oppressions of the representative body’”, and if “It is the best expedient which can be devised in any government to secure a steady, upright, and impartial administration of the laws”; then bad “Behaviour” must do the opposite. If using “Good Behaviour” within the courtrooms is what grants them life tenure, if it does; then using “bad Behaviour” within the courtrooms would end that tenure, though that behavior must be determined “bad” by a jury of the people through prosecution.

    The Preamble to the US Constitution says, “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

    This means that the people themselves are the last word on all of those who serve within the branches of our governments, though that “last word” must also be “in Pursuance thereof” the US Constitution (unless “We the people” change our constitutional republic). That is why all trials must be jury trials made up of the people, with very few and put-into-writing exceptions. This also would apply to trials regarding the behavior of the judges.

    The concept is that “Good Behaviour” allows for the opposite, “bad behavior” or misbehavior. This is backed up historically by a debate John Adams had with William Brattle about the ‘tenure of judges’. At the end of the debate both men agreed that if a judge was appointed during good behavior, then he could also be removed by using bad behaviour”. But this removal was only receiving a “hearing and trial, and an opportunity to defend himself before a fuller board, knowing his accuser and accusation” (for bad behavior). A trial with the jury made up of the people making that decision is critical to the continued freedom and independence of the USA and keeping judges to the US Constitution instead of factions, lobbyists, etc” thus allowing him/her to continue in office for life or as long as they followed the US Constitution using “Good Behaviour”. That it is the people as the jury who makes that decision of guilt or innocence of the judge regarding their behavior after being presented with the facts, not those who are serving within the 3 branches of the federal government or within the state governments.

    In early America impeachment was regarded as one possible procedure for determining whether someone had misbehaved out of many others. But there was no confusion between the two of the different ways of removal; impeachment or the breach of the “good behavior” condition.
    State constitutions expressly allowed for removal of officials with good behavior tenure in the ordinary courts.

    Some states within America granted good behavior tenure even though they did not provide for impeachment at all within their Constitutions.

    The Constitution itself limits the scope of impeachment to removal from office; but there is nothing within it that says that the Founders meant to modify the long-established meaning of good behavior required tenure, most likely because – like the militias of the several states – it was an every day practice, the knowledge taken for granted as being understood.

    The 1787 Northwest Ordinance granted territorial judges good behavior tenure. When one considers that the Continental Congress was a legislature without an impeachment power, this act surely did not contemplate that impeachment would be the method of determining misbehavior.

    The 1790 Crimes Act provided that a judge convicted of taking a bribe would, by virtue of the conviction, be “forever . . . disqualified to hold any office of honour, trust or profit under the United States.” That conviction would deprive the judge of life tenure of the office being occupied. This falls under the “Good Behaviour” tenure.

    Removal procedures would have to include that the accused judge receives the same due process rights associated with conviction for any serious offense, that by meeting those demanding requirements could end in a judges removal from office by a jury trial created from the people themselves, and that this was/is wholly independent and different from the impeachment procedure.

    The next thing that is important is to bring back the peoples voice – elections which is OUR decision. Remove machine voting, prosecute all who have committed Election Fraud, (it is a constitutional crime with no time limitations upon that act). ALL vote counts must be done here in the USA, visible to the watching public – yet protected, plus under multiple videos, and most importantly, VERIFIABLE by the people.

    The US Constitution assigns those duties to us, “We the people of the United States” so that the very things going on today would not be happening.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*