AG urges restoring voting rights to ex-inmates

Eric HolderMail.com

WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General Eric Holder called on a group of states Tuesday to restore voting rights to ex-felons, part of a push to fix what he sees as flaws in the criminal justice system that have a disparate impact on racial minorities.

“It is time to fundamentally rethink laws that permanently disenfranchise people who are no longer under federal or state supervision,” Holder said, targeting 11 states that he said continue to restrict voting rights for former inmates, even after they’ve finished their prison terms.  

“Across this country today, an estimated 5.8 million Americans — 5.8 million of our fellow citizens — are prohibited from voting because of current or previous felony convictions,” Holder told a symposium on criminal justice at Georgetown University.

Now into his fifth year as attorney general and hinting that this year might be his last, Holder survived political controversies that, early on, placed him on the defensive. Now, he is doubling down on the kinds of issues that have long held his interest during a career in law enforcement — prison overcrowding, overly harsh mandatory drug sentences and school disciplinary policies that he says push kids into street crime.

Congress used to be the place that highlighted Holder’s problems, including a plan to try terrorists in New York City and the failed Justice Department investigation of gun smuggling in Arizona that ended in the death of a border patrol agent.

Now, Holder is talking about partnering up with conservative lawmakers like Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who shares concerns such as mandatory minimum prison sentences that can put away low-level drug offenders for decades. On Tuesday, Holder took note of the fact that Paul was to be a participant in the criminal justice symposium later in the morning.

On a topic with racial overtones, Holder said 2.2 million black citizens, or nearly one in 13 African-American adults, are banned from voting because of these laws, and he said the ratio climbs to one in five in Florida, Kentucky and Virginia.

“Although well over a century has passed since post-Reconstruction states used these measures to strip African-Americans of their most fundamental rights, the impact of felony disenfranchisement on modern communities of color remains both disproportionate and unacceptable.”

The 11 states identified by the Justice Department as restricting voting rights of former inmates are Arizona, Florida, Alabama, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, Wyoming, Tennessee and Virginia.

In Iowa, action by the governor caused the state to move from automatic restoration of rights following completion of a criminal sentence to an arduous process requiring direct intervention by the governor in every individual case, Holder said.

“It’s no surprise that, two years after this change — of the 8,000 people who had completed their sentences during that governor’s tenure — voting rights had been restored to fewer than 12,” the attorney general added.

Reaction was swift. In Iowa, the governor’s office disputed Holder’s figures, saying that in 2013, the voting rights of 21 individuals were restored. No applications were denied, and seven applications are pending, the governor’s office said.

Iowa Republican Gov. Terry Branstad “believes that when an individual commits a felony, it is fair they earn their rights back by paying restitution to their victim, court costs, and fines,” said Jimmy Centers, the governor’s spokesman. Centers said Branstad has no plans to change the current process and that too often, victims are forgotten.

Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley said if a prisoner has served a sentence and is a productive citizen, “I believe the people should have their rights.” Those convicted of most felonies in the state can apply to the parole board to get their voting rights restored once they have finished their sentences and probation and paid all fines and restitution.

If Holder has been on an aggressive streak, it’s by design. A year ago, he ordered up a review to find areas in the Justice Department’s mission that needed change. The first results became public last August, when Holder instructed federal prosecutors to stop charging many nonviolent drug defendants with offenses that carry mandatory minimum sentences. He said long mandatory terms have flooded the nation’s prisons with low-level drug offenders and diverted money away from crime fighting.

A month ago, Holder joined Education Secretary Arne Duncan in pressing the nation’s schools to abandon disciplinary policies that send students to court instead of the principal’s office. The two Cabinet officials said “we have found cases where African-American students were disciplined more harshly and more frequently because of their race than similarly situated white students.”

Then over the weekend, Holder applied a landmark Supreme Court opinion to the Justice Department, declaring same-sex spouses cannot be compelled to testify against each other, should be eligible to file for bankruptcy jointly and are entitled to the same rights and privileges as federal prison inmates in opposite-sex marriages.

His call for restoring voting rights for ex-prisoners are part of what the attorney general calls his “Smart On Crime” program. On Tuesday, Holder said that because of state laws that restrict former inmates’ right to vote, about 10 percent of Floridians and 8 percent of people in Mississippi are disenfranchised. Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood said it would require voters to change the state’s constitution.

On the positive side, Holder said 23 states, including Nebraska, Nevada, Texas and Washington state, have enacted recent improvements and Virginia has adopted a policy that automatically restores the voting rights of former prisoners with nonviolent convictions. The Virginia policy was carried out by order of the governor, but Holder said legislation is needed to make permanent change.

Kentucky is studying a proposed constitutional amendment that would put on the state ballot the question of whether to automatically restore voting rights for certain felons who’ve completed their sentences and probation. Championed by a Democratic lawmaker, the proposal also has drawn support from Republicans, including Paul.

A measure introduced in the Wyoming Legislature would allow restoration of voting rights for non-violent felons at the end of their parole and probation or sentence. State law lets people who have been convicted of a single nonviolent felony seek restoration of voting rights once they’ve waited five years after they served their sentence.

Nebraska restores voting rights to felons automatically, two years after they’ve finished their prison sentences and any parole or probation.

AP reporters Catherine Lucey in Des Moines, Iowa, Brett Barrouquere in Louisville, Ky., Ben Neary in Cheyenne, Wyo., Phillip Rawls in Montgomery, Ala., Jack M. Elliott in Jackson, Miss., and Grant Schulte in Lincoln, Neb., contributed to this report.

http://www.mail.com/news/world/2637852-ag-urges-restoring-voting-rights-to-ex-inmates.html#.23140-stage-hero1-10

12 thoughts on “AG urges restoring voting rights to ex-inmates

  1. Why just voteing rights Eh. These arrogant pos laws they say that a so called fellon loses is double jeapordy, isn`t it?? A guy goes to prison and gets out then All of these so called lost rights need to be restord across the board, simple as that. Also why just 11 states, What makes these 11 states so damned special . This just shows how screwed up the system is. The system is a bunch of crap. That Holder should be makin` licencse plates. He and his other cohorts are all partners in crime if there ever was. These laws are only for the law makers as the other people know about how bogus these modern day laws are. Screw holder and all the rest. They are the dangerous ones.

  2. The problem is that so many in law enforcement are corrupt and many are innocent. They’re putting the cart before the horse because soon, I think, they’re going to tell America what Congress has REALLY been doing to the American people. With this, it’ll be a slider into home base when they argue Obama deserves a third term to clean up all of the prior BS. Mark my words. This has been planned out for decades by Pablo Escobar and his Hispanic New World Order connections of which Obama is one. Lock and load.

  3. The police are as corrupt as the politicians. Violent offenders should lose their rights permanantly. Except real criminals DON’T obey the law or the stipulations for their release.
    How about we not only give all non violent offenders back their right to vote, but also give them back their right to protect their families?
    WTF is Holder worried about? The fact that people were paying attention to the votes on things like the Patriot act, NDAA and the Monsanto nightmare. There may be no one to vote for but I have a feeling the incumbents aren’t going to be voted back in.
    I don’t understand how this swine can come out in public. Too bad cops, bankers, corporate CEOs and politicians aren’t throwing themselves out of windows like they are in other countries. But then again maybe those people were helped out of those windows because they knew too much.
    They keep prisoners more uninformed than the rest of us. Gee, I wonder why they want them to vote…

    1. Remember that voting doesn`t mean a damned thing. Only a full blown fool actually thinks that their vote counts for anything.

      1. High Digger,
        I know that but they have to put on a show for the sheep.
        Box 13 Lyndon Johnson tells me voting hasn’t meant anything for at least 50 years.
        Still if they want to make a show of giving them back their voting rights…it’s a good time to demand we give them back their right to have arms…

        1. Well HIGH there aliasooze 😉 . They never took away the right to own and to bear arms one bit. They just like to think they did. Ya see isn`t that in the ” Bill Of Rights ” as stated the right to own and bear arms?
          Ya see when they did that the fellon in question did his time in prison, got out on parole, and then after finishing his parole he should automatically have had all of the rights restored as he did his time and payed his price once already for the crime he was found guilty of. Looseing his rights is paying twice for one or so so called crime. They have aboslutely no right to permanetly take away any bodies rights after they served their sentence.
          Me being a felon should have the right to go any where I want to buy any fire arm or any thing else that I want just as would a non felon. Yea they say you can ask for the rights back but that is a bunch of sh*t as a guy should not have to ask for any rights restored as they should be automatically restored without question.

    2. “Violent offenders should lose their rights permanently.”
      This statement is sedition and an act of treason. Unalienable is absolute and there is no exception. It’s that “well in this instance it should be okay” bullshit that affects that other person and not me that has brought us to a million plus infringements on our rights as a part of this soviet socialist insurgency. If we have our rights absolute and we are all armed, those who would commit violence in infringing on another’s rights, would simply cease to be as a natural consequence.
      As for the vote, to participate, to register, to be a part of what we know to be a foreign insurgent takeover by communists makes anyone who participates a communist and a traitor.

      1. Unalienable either means unalienable or it doesn’t. I think maybe you better get your voting ass back over to Infowars where you came from.

  4. @ Digger I agree 100 %. Maybe we should all vote and at least muddy up the water. Johnson didn’t win by that much. Florida won it for Bush. In Indiana people were convicted of various things having to do with voter fraud when Obama was elected the first time.
    We should demand paper ballots and several average citizens should be watching the counting. Citizens that are picked at the last minute, sort of like jury selection without all the BS lawyers. If there is a paper trail, that’s hard to screw with and they can always be recounted.
    Have you seen the Documentary Voter Fraud The Big Fix 2000?
    That was supposed to say prisoners are less informed up there BTW. Just woke up…mind is moving at a snails pace yet.
    I think God gave you those rights. Isn’t there a passage about what God does let no man tear asunder? Hmmm, marraige vows but still, I think it applies. :mrgreen:

    1. When the ONLY choices you have are THEIR candidates, how could the waters possibly get any muddier?

      Looks like I’ll have to continue posting this, until everyone gets it right. From the movie “Shooter” –

      ” Nick Memphis: And what side are you on?

      Senator Charles F. Meachum: There are no sides. There’s no Sunnis and Shiites. There’s no Democrats and Republicans. There’s only HAVES and HAVE-NOTS.”

      This is the REAL world.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*