Enjoy camping? You may be considered a terrorist by the US government.

Freedom Fighter Times

The outrageous, overreaching, privacy violating surveillance conducted on American citizens everyday shows that if you like to go camping you might be considered a terrorist. The financial institutions of America are monitoring every single purchase made and categorically analyzing what is purchased.  

The First Red Flag.

The excessive, overreaching, privacy-violating surveillance conducted on American citizens every day shows that if you like to go camping, you might be considered a terrorist. The financial institutions of America are monitoring every single purchase made and categorically analyzing it.
The First Red Flag.

Per year on average 42 million Americans go camping. To put it into perspective, that means that 3 out of 25 people in America go camping. That is a lot of campers. More importantly, that is a lot of individuals who shop at camping good stores. According to FINCEN, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network; campers are a red flag.

Experiencing the great outdoors is increasingly becoming a crime in the US, due to the reality that every time a camping commodity is purchased it is tracked, and the person is potentially monitored for terroristic activities as stated explicitly in thedocument leaked on May 29th, 2016.

After analyzing that individual down to their underwear, the US government places them on a list or set of lists; known as the red list, blue list, and yellow list. Depending on the individual status, the police, FBI, or the private sector can be dispatched to monitor the selected person further.

Presented as Evidence

In April 2012, a Kansas SWAT team raided the home of Robert and Addie Harte, their 7-year-old daughter and their 13-year-old son. What was approved by a federal judge, for a potential drug raid; turned out to be a raid for green tea leaves and it al began because they were shopping at a garden store.

There is no shortage of cases like the one above to show that every Americans purchases are monitored. The real question is; what governmental agency is doing the monitoring? That would be the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, their official mission statement: “FinCEN’s mission is to safeguard the financial system from illicit use and combat money laundering and promote national security through the collection, analysis, and dissemination of financial intelligence and strategic use of financial authorities.”

All while the NSA collects phone data another government agency collects American’s purchase history.

For the skeptics; those who believe that the Finsec Document was intended only for “ISIS,” the following is a pdf and list of Americans in which the US government monitors and collects their data.

If you wish to download the document you can do so by joining the Freedom Fighter Community. Get your free account here and download now!

1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”

2. Those that advocate for states’ rights

3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”

4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”

5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”

6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”

7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”

8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”

9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”

10. “Anti-Gay”

11. “Anti-Immigrant”

12. “Anti-Muslim”

13. “The Patriot Movement”

14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”

15. Members of the Family Research Council

16. Members of the American Family Association

17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’”

18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol

19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform

20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition

21. Members of the Christian Action Network

22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”

23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”

24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21

25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps

26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”

27. The militia movement

28. The sovereign citizen movement

29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”

30. Anyone that “complains about bias”

31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”

32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”

33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”

34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”

35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”

36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”

37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”

38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”

39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”

40. “Militia or unorganized militia”

41. “General right-wing extremist”

42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.

43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”

44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”

45. Those that are “anti-global”

46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”

47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”

48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”

49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”

50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”

51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”

52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”

53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”

54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”

55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”

56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”

57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”

58. “Rightwing extremists”

59. “Returning veterans”

60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”

61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”

62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”

63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”

64. “Anti-abortion activists”

65. Those that are against illegal immigration

66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner

67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations

68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”

69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr

70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)

71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies

72. Evangelical Christians

Freedom Fighter Times

8 thoughts on “Enjoy camping? You may be considered a terrorist by the US government.

  1. LOL well that about everyone at one time or another. I happen to love camping but could never afford the gear but I did take every chance I got to go to camp as a kid and go as a chaperone for my girls and grands girl scout outings. That was as close as I could get.

  2. I feel like I read my biography ? Maybe, but I’m also anti list/numberd bullet points these days and that is so central government.

  3. Well, that makes us all terrorists. Don’t purchase a tent or a lantern, you may be deemed a terrorist. “those that believe in the right to bear arms” are terrorists according to this all inclusive list. Show me 1 American who doesn’t fit one of the categories on this government list. It’s utterly ridiculous.

  4. This is ALL a part of their plan: as they know or reasonably should know [as long practiced, seasoned and sophisticated Fraudfeasors] that: One absurdity being allowed, an infinity follows {Uno absurdo dato, infinita sequuntur; 1 Coke, 102};

    They also know that: He who does not blame, approves {Qui non improbat, approbat};

    He who is silent appears to consent {Qui tacet, consentire videtur};

    Damage suffered by consent is not a cause of action {Volenti non fit injuria}; and the following concomitants, infra:

    So, effectively, after giving you written Notice and Opportunity to be Heard all know or reasonably should know that if you do Blame then you are ‘going on a List’ anyway!

    N.B.Hobson’s choice. Cf. Catch 22; Choice of evils; Free agency; Free choice; Free will; Justification; Prosecutorial discretion; Unconscionable Contract or Clause;
    A choice without an alternative; the thing offered or nothing. http://dictionary.reference.com/wordoftheday/archive/2000/01/31.html

    Where to elect there is but one, ’tis Hobson’s choice’ — take that or none. The phrase originates from Thomas Hobson (1544-1630), who lived in Cambridge, England. Hobson was a stable manager renting out horses to travelers; the site of his stables is now part of St. Catharine’s College. After customers began requesting particular horses again and again, Hobson realized certain horses were being overworked. He decided to begin a rotation system, placing the well-rested horses near the stable door, and refused to let out any horse except in its proper turn. He offered customers the choice of taking the horse in the stall nearest the door or taking none at all. Hobson’s choice is somewhat different from a Catch 22 situation, where both (or all) choices available contradict each other. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hobson's_choice

    Miller, Et al. v. Mitchell, No. 09-2144 (3rd Cir. 03/17/2010) accord U.S. v. Troescher, No. 95-55609 (9th Cir. 11/07/1996) (In sum, absent an injunction, the Does would have to choose either to assert their constitutional rights and face a prosecution of Nancy Doe based not on probable cause but as punishment for exercising their constitutional rights, or forgo those rights and avoid prosecution. On the facts before us, this Hobson’s Choice is unconstitutional. While “the Government retains broad discretion as to whom to prosecute,” “the decision to prosecute may not be deliberately based on arbitrary classification, including the exercise of protected statutory and constitutional rights.” Wayte v. United States, 470 U.S. 598, 607–08, 105 S.Ct. 1524, 84 L.Ed.2d 547 (1985) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also United States v. Goodwin, 457 U.S. 368, 372, 102 S.Ct. 2485, 73 L.Ed.2d 74 (1982) (“For while an individual certainly may be penalized for violating the law, he just as certainly may not be punished for exercising a protected statutory or constitutional right.”). http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-3rd-circuit/1593595.html * …
    http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/031710sextingopinion.pdf

    Schultz v. IRS, 395 F.3d 463, No. 04-0196-cv (2nd Cir. 06/29/2005) (The Court’s reaffirmation of Schulz I is clear: any legislative scheme that forces a taxpayer to make a “Hobson’s choice” between either capitulating to an IRS administrative demand, or risk bearing the pains of IRS’s wrath if she refuses to comply — without access to judicial review, violates the Constitution.); http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/CourtFilings/2ndCirc-ORDER-RewriteDENIED6-05.pdfhttp://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Update2005-07-04.htm

  5. Dam, I’m 6 short of 100%. I wonder if Pro-nuclear could count. “Suddenly buys a gun”? Does that mean I see one that I don’t have and buy it?
    Have to work on 15, 16, 19, 20, 21.

  6. Americans are being ‘red flagged’ for buying first-person shooter games

    Banks are spying on our social media activity

    “Financial institutions may find available social media information helpful in evaluating potential suspicious activity and in identifying risks connected to the red flags provided in this and other advisories. Similarly, the location from which a customer logs into a financial institution’s online services platform may also be considered when determining whether a transaction is suspicious.”

    Banks are secretly ‘red flagging’ our transactions:

    “In applying the red flags below, financial institutions are advised that no single transactional red flag is a clear indicator of terrorist activity.
    http://massprivatei.blogspot.com/2016/06/banks-are-secretly-red-flagging-our.html

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published.


*