Utah police reopen shooting investigation with new video reportedly showing cop shooting man in the back

Raw Story – by TOM BOGGIONI

Police investigators in Salt Lake City are taking a second look at a an officer involved shooting dating back to Jan. 8, 2015, because new cellphone video may show that the officer shot the victim in the back while he is on the ground.

Salt Lake City Police Officer Matthew Taylor was cleared last year in the shooting death of 42-year-old James Dudley Barker. According to Taylor, he feared for his life after Barker swung a snow shovel at him resulting in fractures to his arm and a foot.  

Cellphone footage of officer  Matt Taylor leaning over James Dudley Barker -- screenshotAccording to the Salt Lake Tribune, new cellphone footage of the incident purportedly shows Taylor shooting Barker in the back after a struggle between the two.

The video was provided to the District Attorney’s office on Friday, with investigators now saying they plan to examine it and see how it compares with other evidence in the case.

“Our job and our commitment has always been [to be] as thorough and open and transparent as we can, so we are going to do our due diligence to re-examine what we have,” Salt Lake County District Attorney Sim Gill said in a statement.

According to a police-reform investigator who also provided the video to the Tribune, Barker can be seen on the ground — possibly already handcuffed — when what sounds like three shots ring out.

Earlier footage showed Barker going to door-to-door apparently looking for work shoveling snow. According to police, Taylor was dispatched when one neighbor reported Barker as looking suspicious.

Video taken from Taylor’s bodycam shows him speaking and arguing  with Barker before it cuts out as the two began fighting. The new video does not show the the two men fighting, instead beginning with Barker face down as Taylor kneels over him.

According to attorney Robert Rubin, who has been working on the case at the request of Barker’s friends, it appears that the officer shot Barker three times in the back while handcuffed.

“At the very least, we want the district attorney to reopen the case,” he said Friday.

In an interesting twist, the new video was turned over exactly one day after a one-year period expired during which a person can file a claim against a police officer to pursue legal redress.

That statute of limitations would not apply in federal court or in a criminal investigation.

Watch the video below:

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/01/utah-police-reopen-shooting-investigation-with-new-video-reportedly-showing-cop-shooting-man-in-the-back/

5 thoughts on “Utah police reopen shooting investigation with new video reportedly showing cop shooting man in the back

  1. “….it appears that the officer shot Barker three times in the back while handcuffed.”

    It’s impossible for the coroner, or any doctor to NOT notice that this guy took three bullets in his back, so hanging this murderous pig bastard is only the beginning of the necessary punishments.

    We’re already aware that the psychotic pig bastards shoot anyone who pisses them off, and their day is coming soon, but how many people are involved in helping them get away with these cold-blooded murders?

    Why did it take a year for this to be investigated?

    1. Because it was a year before evidence the pigs could not wave away and lie about came to light. Everyone involved needs to be hung or imo put to extreme labor from “can’t see to can’t see”, sick or healthy until death.

  2. LDS does not kill people. People kill people. Don’t forget the LDS church are killers just like the rest. Research the Lee’s Ferry massacre.
    LDS ….. They’re fine ….in Utah as long as you blow Mr. Smith in
    “Lost in Space”
    They sold us out to the NSA datacenter that houses NSA, Oracle Google etc….

  3. “In an interesting twist, the new video was turned over exactly one day after a one-year period expired during which a person can file a claim against a police officer to pursue legal redress.”

    That IS interesting. Not only the fact of the time limit expiration, but the long-after release as well. I’ve been noticing this a LOT lately.

    Almost as if they’re deliberately trying to ramp up anti-pig sentiment to new levels.

    Nawwww… they’d never do anything like that.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*