Obama, you are the living definition of hypocrisy!
Your homo agenda-THATS NOT RIGHT!
Your being foreign born yet president-THATS NOT RIGHT!
Your bringing the third world trash here-THATS NOT RIGHT!
Your executing law by executive order-THATS NOT RIGHT!
Your destroying the Bill of Rights-THATS NOT RIGHT!
Your breathing the same air as I-THATS NOT RIGHT!
First understand that no person who runs for the Office of US President that does NOT meet ALL of the requirements of the position – or any other office in government – can become “President”. It matters not how many votes because we are NOT a “democracy”. Nothing matters but that the person meet all 3 requirements and then that they are HONESTLY ELECTED.
So starting with Bush 1 and going through to Obama we have NOT had an American President. We have had/have presidential impersonators.
It also means that they cannot lawfully represent our country and the American people in anything – treaties/laws/agreements/contracts/etc. Because our government is in writing (Yes, the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution together are our government – NOT the people who serve within them whatever position they occupy. THAT is why the required Oaths are to “Support and Defend” for all – except those who LAWFULLY serve as US Presidents who are held to a higher standard to PRESERVE, Protect, and Defend THE US CONSTITUTION; not an office, not a person.
Also, because it is in writing and easily available to all people, nations, entities, etc NOTHING that those people, and the rest who were serving in the other branches did when impersonating positions that represent us/our nation, is LAWFUL and BINDING on the American people or this nation. They could always read it for themselves to see if that person had any lawfulness and real authority when supposedly representing us and our nation – they have always been encouraged to do so.
Contracts are strict, and an contract law has been around for a long time. But our documents go beyond being a contract, defining our way of government, assigning the duties to the different BRANCHES AND specific named-in-writing OFFICES within a branch; it is also the Supreme LAW of our nation that all other laws are required to be in Pursuance thereof it.
Read the US Constitution so that you can better understand our nation and be a better and more informed American, its a short document. Also, read this so that you can be a more informed jurist when called – encourage others to do the same http://fija.org/.
Why? Because it is OUR tool, the People’s tool and judges and prosecutors today LIE. Neither it or the *Grand Jury, *Grand Jury Investigations are under (assigned to) any branch of the federal or state governments. It/they is/are a too(s)l WE retained to ourselves, much like the Elections – which we also let them – actually the parties – take over; and the Militia – because the arms are to be in the people’s hands not the governments.
If you did not know it is the Militia has as its constitutionally assigned duties to:
— Enforce the US Constitution (supreme LAW) and each state’s Constitution (highest LAW of the state),
— Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
— Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
— “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.
That both the state and federal governments are constitutionally REQUIRED to use the Militia for those purposes – no other group/agency/person/contractor/etc. But the excuse used is that there is no more lawful Militia – one trained as the congress requires the military to train and educated in the US Constitution and their own state’s Constitution. That is because the Militia is NOT under governmental control – state or federal – but called into service to both when needed. Because the Militia is us, and armed, trained, and educated in our legitimate government makes it much harder to destroy our nation from within, to use police and/or military against us (which we are also NOT supposed to have a permanent military).
George Washington, “Sentiments on a Peace Establishment”, letter to Alexander Hamilton; “The Writings of George Washington”: “It may be laid down, as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every citizen who enjoys the protection of a free government…, but even of his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency.”
Oh, and the only crimes assigned to the federal government in the Constitution for law enforcement purposes are Treason, Piracy, Counterfeiting, and International law violations. They have no lawful authority anywhere else.
Richard Henry Lee, 1788, Initiator of the Declaration of Independence, and member of the first Senate, which passed the Bill of Rights: “Whereas, to preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them; nor does it follow from this, that all promiscuously must go into actual service on every occasion. The mind that aims at a select militia, must be influenced by a truly anti-republican principle; and when we see many men disposed to practice upon it, whenever they can prevail, no wonder true republicans are for carefully guarding against it.”
Tench Coxe: “Who are the militia? are they not ourselves. Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American…The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”
*Grand Jury – “The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people”.
“Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present “True Bills” of indictment to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding. Our Founding Fathers presciently thereby created a “buffer” the people may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law.” (Misbehavior, “Good Behaviour” requirement)
“The grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside, we think it clear that, as a general matter at least, no such “supervisory” judicial authority exists. The “common law” of the Fifth Amendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury.”
“Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the judicial branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm’s length. Judges’ direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. The grand jury’s functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is exercised.”
“The grand jury ‘can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not.’ It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even “the precise nature of the offense” it is investigating. The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation, nor does the prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment. And in its day-to-day functioning, the grand jury generally operates without the interference of a presiding judge. It swears in its own witnesses and deliberates in total secrecy.”
“Recognizing this tradition of independence, we have said the 5th Amendment’s constitutional guarantee presupposes an investigative body ‘acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge”
“Given the grand jury’s operational separateness from its constituting court, it should come as no surprise that we have been reluctant to invoke the judicial supervisory power as a basis for prescribing modes of grand jury procedure. Over the years, we have received many requests to exercise supervision over the grand jury’s evidence-taking process, but we have refused them all. “it would run counter to the whole history of the grand jury institution” to permit an indictment to be challenged “on the ground that there was incompetent or inadequate evidence before the grand jury.” (Nor would it be lawful of them to do so.) Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority said In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992)
Obama, you are the living definition of hypocrisy!
Your homo agenda-THATS NOT RIGHT!
Your being foreign born yet president-THATS NOT RIGHT!
Your bringing the third world trash here-THATS NOT RIGHT!
Your executing law by executive order-THATS NOT RIGHT!
Your destroying the Bill of Rights-THATS NOT RIGHT!
Your breathing the same air as I-THATS NOT RIGHT!
@ Katie,
First understand that no person who runs for the Office of US President that does NOT meet ALL of the requirements of the position – or any other office in government – can become “President”. It matters not how many votes because we are NOT a “democracy”. Nothing matters but that the person meet all 3 requirements and then that they are HONESTLY ELECTED.
So starting with Bush 1 and going through to Obama we have NOT had an American President. We have had/have presidential impersonators.
It also means that they cannot lawfully represent our country and the American people in anything – treaties/laws/agreements/contracts/etc. Because our government is in writing (Yes, the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution together are our government – NOT the people who serve within them whatever position they occupy. THAT is why the required Oaths are to “Support and Defend” for all – except those who LAWFULLY serve as US Presidents who are held to a higher standard to PRESERVE, Protect, and Defend THE US CONSTITUTION; not an office, not a person.
Also, because it is in writing and easily available to all people, nations, entities, etc NOTHING that those people, and the rest who were serving in the other branches did when impersonating positions that represent us/our nation, is LAWFUL and BINDING on the American people or this nation. They could always read it for themselves to see if that person had any lawfulness and real authority when supposedly representing us and our nation – they have always been encouraged to do so.
Contracts are strict, and an contract law has been around for a long time. But our documents go beyond being a contract, defining our way of government, assigning the duties to the different BRANCHES AND specific named-in-writing OFFICES within a branch; it is also the Supreme LAW of our nation that all other laws are required to be in Pursuance thereof it.
Read the US Constitution so that you can better understand our nation and be a better and more informed American, its a short document. Also, read this so that you can be a more informed jurist when called – encourage others to do the same http://fija.org/.
Why? Because it is OUR tool, the People’s tool and judges and prosecutors today LIE. Neither it or the *Grand Jury, *Grand Jury Investigations are under (assigned to) any branch of the federal or state governments. It/they is/are a too(s)l WE retained to ourselves, much like the Elections – which we also let them – actually the parties – take over; and the Militia – because the arms are to be in the people’s hands not the governments.
If you did not know it is the Militia has as its constitutionally assigned duties to:
— Enforce the US Constitution (supreme LAW) and each state’s Constitution (highest LAW of the state),
— Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
— Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
— “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.
That both the state and federal governments are constitutionally REQUIRED to use the Militia for those purposes – no other group/agency/person/contractor/etc. But the excuse used is that there is no more lawful Militia – one trained as the congress requires the military to train and educated in the US Constitution and their own state’s Constitution. That is because the Militia is NOT under governmental control – state or federal – but called into service to both when needed. Because the Militia is us, and armed, trained, and educated in our legitimate government makes it much harder to destroy our nation from within, to use police and/or military against us (which we are also NOT supposed to have a permanent military).
George Washington, “Sentiments on a Peace Establishment”, letter to Alexander Hamilton; “The Writings of George Washington”: “It may be laid down, as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every citizen who enjoys the protection of a free government…, but even of his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency.”
Oh, and the only crimes assigned to the federal government in the Constitution for law enforcement purposes are Treason, Piracy, Counterfeiting, and International law violations. They have no lawful authority anywhere else.
Richard Henry Lee, 1788, Initiator of the Declaration of Independence, and member of the first Senate, which passed the Bill of Rights: “Whereas, to preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them; nor does it follow from this, that all promiscuously must go into actual service on every occasion. The mind that aims at a select militia, must be influenced by a truly anti-republican principle; and when we see many men disposed to practice upon it, whenever they can prevail, no wonder true republicans are for carefully guarding against it.”
Tench Coxe: “Who are the militia? are they not ourselves. Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American…The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”
*Grand Jury – “The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people”.
“Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present “True Bills” of indictment to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding. Our Founding Fathers presciently thereby created a “buffer” the people may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law.” (Misbehavior, “Good Behaviour” requirement)
“The grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside, we think it clear that, as a general matter at least, no such “supervisory” judicial authority exists. The “common law” of the Fifth Amendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury.”
“Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the judicial branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm’s length. Judges’ direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. The grand jury’s functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is exercised.”
“The grand jury ‘can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not.’ It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even “the precise nature of the offense” it is investigating. The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation, nor does the prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment. And in its day-to-day functioning, the grand jury generally operates without the interference of a presiding judge. It swears in its own witnesses and deliberates in total secrecy.”
“Recognizing this tradition of independence, we have said the 5th Amendment’s constitutional guarantee presupposes an investigative body ‘acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge”
“Given the grand jury’s operational separateness from its constituting court, it should come as no surprise that we have been reluctant to invoke the judicial supervisory power as a basis for prescribing modes of grand jury procedure. Over the years, we have received many requests to exercise supervision over the grand jury’s evidence-taking process, but we have refused them all. “it would run counter to the whole history of the grand jury institution” to permit an indictment to be challenged “on the ground that there was incompetent or inadequate evidence before the grand jury.” (Nor would it be lawful of them to do so.) Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority said In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992)
Not ONE of those sheeple behind him is smiling…. at least not in the still shot on the screen.
I think they realize they’ve been screwed by this jewb#tch @ssclown.
Brain dead people don’t know how to smile, as they cannot perceive when something is funny.
NOW THATS RIGHT.