Month: November 2020

American Thinker – by Fay Voshell

Kate Brown, the Governor of Oregon, was rather ambivalent in her approach to violence during the time Portland was torched by radical mobs.  In fact, she thanked “Oregonians for expressing their free speech rights largely through joyful celebrations…”

But Gov. Brown apparently did some soul searching since the election.  She found a joyful celebration about to be held by unquestionable enemies of the people.  It turns out actual domestic terrorists are Oregonians who wanted to celebrate Thanksgiving.  It’s extremists who wished to dine on turkey and all the trimmings who are dangerous, as they are potential super-spreaders of disease and destruction.  Therefore, it’s Thanksgiving celebrations that need to be tightly regulated. It’s Thanksgiving celebrants who need to be fined and sent to jail if they transgress the regulations the governor has established by executive order.  Continue reading “First, They Came for Thanksgiving; Now They Are Coming for Christmas”

COVID-19 Vaccination Program Interim Playbook for Jurisdiction Operations

Family Research Council

In Oregon, you can have cocaine, but not cranberries. Heroin, but no ham. Meth, but not mashed potatoes! Amazingly, a state that just legalized drugs wants to criminalize Thanksgiving! Talk about a double helping of hypocrisy–just in time for the holidays.

Of course, Governor Kate Brown (D) wasn’t exactly winning any popularity contests as it was. Now, after her ridiculous orders–which would force families of seven or more to turn away their own children from the meal–she’s become a national punchline. So let me get this straight, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) tweeted: “You can be jailed for having too many people over for Thanksgiving. But if you want to riot and loot in Portland, no sweat!” That’s right, Jason Rantz mocked. “In Oregon, they’re tougher on families than they are on Antifa!” Continue reading “Oregon Quits Thanksgiving Cold Turkey”

Daily Mail

Tax filings from the National Rifle Association have revealed that current and former top executives received at least $1.4 million in improper or excessive benefits in violation of non-profit rules, according to a new report.

Wayne LaPierre, the NRA’s chief executive, repaid the NRA $300,000 related to travel expenses deemed to be an ‘excess benefit,’ according to the 2019 tax filing reported by the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday. Continue reading “NRA tax filing reveals top execs received $1.4M in ‘excess benefits’ after New York AG accused them of misappropriating funds for private jets, vacations and lavish meals”

Unz Review – by Philip Giraldi

President Donald Trump’s gifts to Israel in the last few weeks of his administration are, quite frankly, incomprehensible based on any consideration that U.S. foreign policy should be reflective of American national and international interests. On the contrary, the nearly worldwide assessment of the United States as a completely rogue nation headed by someone who is quite plausibly insane and led by the nose by Israel has done considerable damage to America’s ability to lead on important issues like nuclear proliferation and climate change. Continue reading “Trump Administration Displays Its Love for Israel”

Zero Hedge – by Tyler Durden

Sidney Powell has finally released the Kraken – filing two lawsuits in Michigan and Georgia late Wednesday alleging massive schemes to rig the election for Joe Biden.

In Georgia, Powell claims in a 104-page complaint filed in the US District Court in Atlanta that the purpose of the scheme was “illegally and fraudulently manipulating the vote count to make certain the election of Joe Biden as president of the United States.” Continue reading ““The Fraud Was Executed By Many Means”: Sidney Powell “Releases Kraken” With Dual Lawsuits In Michigan, Georgia”

Deadline – by Tom Tapp

On Tuesday, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors heard details about a new “targeted” stay-at-home order that would prohibit all public and private gatherings of people not in the same household and require individuals to stay home “as much as possible.”

The proposed order met with no objections from the board, but it was unclear when it might take effect. Continue reading “L.A.’s New “Targeted” Stay-At-Home Order Restrictions Revealed; Unclear When They Take Effect”

Axios – by Barak Ravid