Supreme Court Ruled The 4th Amendment No Longer Applies to Police.

US Supreme CourtMilitia News

The US Supreme Court (USSC) has ruled another devastating blow against freedom and the 4th Amendment, including the Bill of Rights.

The ruling made by the US Supreme Court on Tuesday (February 25, 2014) says police don’t need a warrant to search your property. As long as two occupants disagree about allowing officers to enter, and the resident who refuses access is then arrested, police may enter the residence. In other words, the US Supreme Court has ruled that police officers may enter and search a home without a warrant as long as one of the occupants agrees to the search.  

In 2009, Walter Fernandez, a Los Angeles resident, was arrested and removed from his residence. During the incident, Fernandez refused police entry into his home as a violation of his 4th Amendment rights because the officers did not have a warrant.

Once Fernandez was in custody, the police returned to his residence and searched anyway. Their findings became evidence in the prosecutor’s case against Fernandez.

Based on the findings and previous rulings in Fernandez’ case, the USSC ruled that the police had a lawful right to search his home and Fernandez was in the wrong in having prevented that police from doing so during his arrest.

Justice Samuel Ailto, author of the decision, explained that: “A warrantless consent search is reasonable and thus consistent with the 4th Amendment irrespective of the availability of a warrant. Even with modern technological advances, the warrant procedure imposes burdens on the officers who wish to search [and] the magistrate who must review the warrant application.”

Dissenting Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan wrote that the court was at fault for having a weak requirement for obtaining a search warrant.

Ginsberg pointed out: “Instead of adhering to the warrant requirement, today’s decision tells the police they may dodge it.”

http://www.militianews.com/supreme-court-ruled-4th-amendment-longer-applies-police/

24 thoughts on “Supreme Court Ruled The 4th Amendment No Longer Applies to Police.

  1. wonder if these thugs are also prepared to dodge a shot gun, 44 mag, 38,
    9 mm, or a myriad of other unregistered freedom preserving tools.

  2. This is the “law of precedent” there is no such thing, but they look for these cases and it will create an illusion of “law of precedent”. It takes away your freedoms, but these attorneys can find ways around that, and believe me that is their job. They are paid well for these cases, once you set a “law of precedent” it is used in other court cases, making it a law, that was never a law to begin with. SEE THE PATTERN????????????

    1. yes Missy. I see it. It makes me very angry. They can take their precedent, and shove it. There is a tree limb in WI. that may have to be utilized for some of these traitors. There is also a hemp rope to sling over that tree limb.

          1. Yes guys, I talked to that guy in Wi. and he said with all the hangings that will be going on that that rope would be a excellent double noose rope.
            Yep, that guy said that double noose increases the suspence as the two that will be on that rope can kick the crap out of each other while doing their final rope dance.
            Yea, I know that guy very well up in Wi. 😉

          2. Hey Digger i figured you mite know that guy. Missy said she has some hemp rope waiting. maybe that guy in Wi. will need a spare just in case. .

          3. Good Morning Paul, Yes I bet that when all them hemp ropes start to wear out that he just may need a replacement. 😉

    1. I’m sure he’s resting right now (well needed). Tonight it is going to hit -20 in his neck of the woods. He’ll be back. 🙂 😉

          1. Yes, we broke another record last night, I believe they said we were down to minus 22.
            Yes they just said we hit a record low of minus 22.
            Right now at 6:42 am it is minus 17 .
            Yes guys this winter has really broke a lot of budgets – I sure know it did mine about a month ago. I didn`t think I would have to start dippin` into my preppin` supplies this way dang it. Guess that is why us guys have been preppin though
            🙂

  3. WOW! This is all out WAR! HANG’EM! HANG’EM! HANG’EM! I

    n the meantime, lock and load. The police better be prepared when they come door to door because if they are not expected to follow our Bill of Rights, then we sure as hell aren’t going to be following THEIR Police Bill of Rights.

  4. My Fellow Patriots:

    Gee,.. I really wish the Supreme Traitors had just gone all the way and stated the 4th Amendment is null & void.

    I just want to get going on saving this country,.. and that means as they get more bold, and piss more and more into peoples faces,…. the closer we come to cleaning out the rats nest,.. and restoring the Republic.

    JD – US Marines – The US Gov’t has been officially overthrown. This Enemy-Force-In-Occupation, with all its agencies and militarized police ARE the terrorists,.. bar none.

  5. “Justice Samuel Ailto, author of the decision, explained that: “A warrantless consent search is reasonable and thus consistent with the 4th Amendment irrespective of the availability of a warrant. Even with modern technological advances, the warrant procedure imposes burdens on the officers who wish to search [and] the magistrate who must review the warrant application.””

    That is the most blatant and in your face treason and violation of the Bill of Rights that I have ever seen or read to date.

    Yep, he’s definitely following that Communist’s Dictionary of the 4th Article to the Bill of Rights. The one where everything is the opposite of what it says and means.

    Oh yea, this Communist bastard is DEFINITELY gonna hang!

  6. Goes back to Marbury vs. Madison, which allowed the Supreme Court to say something is Constitutional just because they feel like it. what I can’t believe though is the three MOST LIBERAL Justices (Kagan, Sotomayor, and Ginsberg) opposed it, and, BTW, Ginsberg and Kagan are JEWISH!
    Astounding!

  7. “(Kagan, Sotomayor, and Ginsberg) opposed it, and, BTW, Ginsberg and Kagan are JEWISH!”

    They’re trying to cover their asses and take pressure off the tribe.
    And I’ll bet the ones who did vote for it were instructed to vote that way by their talmudic owners.

    They don’t fool me for one second. They always talk out of both sides of their crack.

    By attempting to null and void any natural right, they’ve declared war across the board. Rights are non negotiable. If they attempt this by force they must get force in return. As a sovereign person, I will not bow down.
    I will, however, obligingly send them to hell where they belong.

    -flek

  8. so is this were the shot that starts the revolution is fired?

    some people are going to fight back, and not observe their idiotic ruling

    that’s when the fun begins and the ropes swing

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*